Help end the replication crisis in the social sciences

In summary, a study conducted on knives made from frozen human feces found that they do not work. This was based on an ethnographic account of an Inuit man who allegedly made a knife from his own feces. The experiment tested multiple knives made from frozen human feces and concluded that they were not effective. The study also suggested that further research with a larger variety of feces samples under controlled conditions would be beneficial.
  • #1
BWV
1,524
1,863
Here is one you can try at home:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X19305371

Experimental replication shows knives manufactured from frozen human feces do not work​

Author links open overlay panelMetin I.ErenabMary AnnRaghantia
Show more
Outline
Share
Cite
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.102002Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Highlights​


•
An ethnographic account states an Inuit man made a knife from his own frozen feces.
•
We experimentally tested knives manufactured from frozen human feces.
•
Knives manufactured from frozen human feces do not work.
 
  • Like
Likes Office_Shredder and Frabjous
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
We would not be testing enough varieties of feces under controlled conditions. Please post your mailing address so that we can all mail you representative samples for testing. :-p
 
  • Haha
Likes BWV
  • #3
Grad students who accumulate enough results can write feces theses.
 
  • #4
An excellent reference is Swanson, J Building With Poop.
 

FAQ: Help end the replication crisis in the social sciences

What is the replication crisis in the social sciences?

The replication crisis refers to the inability to reproduce or replicate results of studies in the social sciences. This means that when a study is repeated with the same methods and data, the results are often not the same. This has raised concerns about the validity and reliability of research in the social sciences.

What are the causes of the replication crisis in the social sciences?

There are several factors that contribute to the replication crisis in the social sciences. These include publication bias, where studies with positive results are more likely to be published, and the use of small sample sizes, which can lead to unreliable results. Other factors include research misconduct and flawed research methods.

How does the replication crisis impact the field of social sciences?

The replication crisis has a significant impact on the field of social sciences. It undermines the credibility and trust in research findings and can lead to misguided policies and interventions based on flawed research. It also wastes resources and time as researchers try to replicate studies with unreliable results.

What steps can be taken to help end the replication crisis in the social sciences?

To help end the replication crisis, researchers can prioritize transparency and open science practices, such as pre-registering studies and making data and methods openly available. Journal editors can also play a role by encouraging replication studies and requiring authors to disclose any conflicts of interest. Additionally, funding agencies can support replication studies and promote the use of rigorous research methods.

What are the potential benefits of addressing the replication crisis in the social sciences?

Addressing the replication crisis can lead to more reliable and trustworthy research findings, which can inform evidence-based policies and interventions. It can also promote a culture of transparency and accountability in the field of social sciences. Additionally, it can save time and resources by preventing the replication of flawed studies and promoting the use of more rigorous research methods.

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top