Help evaluating a rational integral using residue

In summary, the student attempted to solve a homework equation using a semicircular contour, but forgot to include an i in the exponent of zeta_3. They then tried to solve the equation using a smaller wedge, but eventually realized that the principle behind the integral can be expressed in terms of a constant times the line (0, ∞).
  • #1
TopCat
58
0

Homework Statement


I need to compute [tex]\int_0^\infty \frac{dx}{x^3+a^3}.[/tex]

Homework Equations



If f = g/h, then [tex]Res(f, a) = \frac{g(a)}{h'(a)}.[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


In the first I've used a semicircular contour in the upper plane that is semi-circular around the pole at -a. So I calculate the integral to be

[tex]1/2 (2\pi iRes(f, -ae^i{2\pi/3}) - \pi i Res(f, -a)) = 1/2 (\frac{2\pi i}{3a^2 e^i{4\pi/3}}-\frac{\pi i}{3a^2}) = \cdot \frac{-\pi i}{3\sqrt{3}a^2+6a^2}.[/tex] The 1/2 comes from those residues being the calculation of the integral over the whole real line, the first term comes from the integral over the entire contour, which contains the pole at [itex]-a\zeta_3[/itex], while the second term from the part of the contour around x=-a. The answer is listed as [tex]\frac{2\pi}{3\sqrt{3}a^2},[/tex] so I'm not sure where I went wrong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
TopCat said:
In the first I've used a semicircular contour in the upper plane that is semi-circular around the pole at -a.
Your integration path is not clear to me. Can you be more precise?
There seems to be an i missing in the locations of the complex poles.
 
  • #3
haruspex said:
Your integration path is not clear to me. Can you be more precise?
There seems to be an i missing in the locations of the complex poles.

Sure. My contour is the upper half of a circle of radius r, the segment from -r to -a-e, the upper half of a circle of radius e around -a, and the segment from -a+e to r. I took the limits r -> infinity and e -> 0. The integral over the arc goes to zero, so I end up with the integral over the real line + pi*i*residue at -a = 2*pi*i*residue inside the contour.

I notice that I forgot to add the i into the exponent of zeta_3, I'll edit the original post. I did use it in my calculations.
 
  • #4
But the desired integral is only over the positive real line.
 
  • #5
haruspex said:
But the desired integral is only over the positive real line.

That's why I multiplied by 1/2. But now that I think about it, that wouldn't work since the function isn't symmetric about the y-axis, right?
 
  • #7
I don't see which contour would be best to use in this situation.
 
  • #8
TopCat said:
I don't see which contour would be best to use in this situation.

Tell you what, first get it working for say [itex]a=2[/itex] by introducing a branch cut along the real axis and considering:

[tex]\oint \frac{\log(z)}{z^3+8}dz[/tex]

around a key-hole contour with the key-hole along the positive real axis. One minor issue is the residue in the fourth quadrant. Note the analytic-extension of [itex]\log(z)[/itex] over that contour into that quadrant is actually [itex]\text{Log}(z)+2\pi i[/itex] right? Ok, get that one then generalize it to any [itex]a[/itex].

Edit:

Afraid I made this more complicated than it needed to be: Easier probably to integrate directly [itex]1/(z^3+8)[/itex] over a [itex]2\pi/3[/itex] wedge contour bordering the positive real axis and in that way, only encircle one pole in the first quadrant and not even need to worry about dealing with the log branch-cut. Sorry.
 
Last edited:
  • #9
jackmell said:
integrate directly [itex]1/(z^3+8)[/itex] over a [itex]2\pi/3[/itex] wedge contour bordering the positive real axis and in that way, only encircle one pole in the first quadrant
... and the trick then is to express the integral over the line r e2πi/3 as a constant times that over (0, ∞) portion, yes?
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
... and the trick then is to express the integral over the line r e2πi/3 as a constant times that over (0, ∞) portion, yes?

Yes:

[tex]\mathop\int\limits_{C} \frac{1}{z^3+8}dz=\int_{\infty}^0 \frac{1}{r^3 e^{6\pi i/3}+8} e^{2\pi i/3} dr[/tex]

You can see how to get that right? Hope that's not an insulting question to ask.

Then surely, I think, we can do smaller wedges to figure out:

[tex]
\int_0^{\infty} \frac{1}{z^n+a^n}dz[/tex]

You may wish to look at that one to get the general principle down.
 

FAQ: Help evaluating a rational integral using residue

What is a rational integral?

A rational integral is an integral with a rational function as its integrand. A rational function is a ratio of two polynomials, where the numerator and denominator are both polynomials in the variable of integration.

What is a residue?

A residue is a complex number that is calculated using the Cauchy residue theorem and is used to evaluate integrals with singularities, such as poles, on the contour of integration.

How do you use residues to evaluate a rational integral?

To evaluate a rational integral using residues, you first need to identify the singularities (poles) of the integrand and determine their corresponding residues. Then, you use the Cauchy residue theorem to calculate the value of the integral by summing the residues of the singularities within the contour of integration.

What is the Cauchy residue theorem?

The Cauchy residue theorem is a mathematical theorem that states that the value of a contour integral of a function is equal to the sum of the residues of the singularities within the contour. It is a powerful tool for evaluating integrals with singularities.

What are the applications of using residues to evaluate integrals?

Residues are useful for evaluating integrals with singularities, which are common in physics and engineering problems. They are also used in complex analysis, number theory, and other branches of mathematics.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
748
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top