Help with an Equivalence Relation?

In summary, the conversation discusses an equivalence relation involving the absolute value function on the set of real numbers. It is determined to be reflexive, and a general theorem is introduced to prove the reflexivity of a relation. It is noted that this theorem does not hold for an arbitrary relation, using the example of friendship between people. The speaker expresses confusion about why this particular relation was confusing for them.
  • #1
katye333
10
0
Hello all, I have an equivalence relation that I need some help with. Normally I find these to be fairly simple, however I'm not sure if I'm over-thinking this one or if it's just tricky.

For the relation: aRb $\Longleftrightarrow$ |a| = |b| on $\mathbb{R}$ determine whether it is an equivalence relation.

Reflexive: Would it really be reflexive? If a = -2, then wouldn't |a| = +2?

Or would it be reflexive, since all a's are contained in a?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
katye333 said:
Reflexive: Would it really be reflexive? If a = -2, then wouldn't |a| = +2?
Or would it be reflexive, since all a's are contained in a?

A relation $R$ is reflexive on a set $S$ if and only if $aRa$ for all $a\in S$. In our case $|a|=|a|$ for all $a\in \mathbb{R}$ i.e. $aRa$ for all $a\in \mathbb{R}$, which implies that $R$ is reflexive on $\mathbb{R}$.
 
  • #3
You can prove a general theorem. Let $A$, $B$ be sets and $f:A\to B$ a total function. Let a relation $R$ on $A$ be defined by $a_1Ra_2\iff f(a_1)=f(a_2)$. Then $R$ is an equivalence relation. In this case $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ is the absolute value function. You can also apply this theorem to $f(x)=\mathop{\text{sgn}}(x)=\begin{cases}1&x>0\\ 0&x=0\\ -1&x<0\end{cases}$, $f(x)=\lfloor x\rfloor$, etc.

Note also that if we take not a function $f$, but an arbitrary relation $F\subseteq A\times B$ and define \[a_1Ra_2\iff \text{there exists a }b\in B\text{ such that }a_1Fb\text{ and }a_2Fb\] then the statement does not hold in general. (Which property of an equivalence relation gets violated?) For example, it does not hold if $A=B$ is a set of people and $aFb\iff b$ is a friend $a$.
 
  • #4
Thank you both for the responses.
I don't know why that one confused me, while none of the others did. :p
 
  • #5


Hello,

Thank you for reaching out for help with your equivalence relation. Let's first define what an equivalence relation is. An equivalence relation is a relation that is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. This means that for the relation aRb, it must satisfy the following properties:

1. Reflexive: For all elements a, aRa must be true.
2. Symmetric: If aRb is true, then bRa must also be true.
3. Transitive: If aRb and bRc are true, then aRc must also be true.

Now, let's apply these properties to the relation you have provided, aRb $\Longleftrightarrow$ |a| = |b| on $\mathbb{R}$.

1. Reflexive: To determine if a relation is reflexive, we must check if aRa is true for all elements a. In this case, it means we must check if |a| = |a| for all real numbers a. And the answer to that is yes, because the absolute value of any number is always equal to itself. So, the relation is reflexive.
2. Symmetric: To check if a relation is symmetric, we must check if whenever aRb is true, bRa is also true. In this case, it means we must check if |a| = |b| implies |b| = |a|. And the answer to that is also yes, because the absolute value of a number is independent of its sign. So, the relation is symmetric.
3. Transitive: To check if a relation is transitive, we must check if whenever aRb and bRc are true, aRc is also true. In this case, it means we must check if |a| = |b| and |b| = |c| implies |a| = |c|. And the answer to that is yes, because if two numbers have the same absolute value, then their absolute values must also be equal. So, the relation is transitive.

Therefore, the relation aRb $\Longleftrightarrow$ |a| = |b| on $\mathbb{R}$ is an equivalence relation. I hope this helps clarify any confusion you may have had. If you have any further questions or need any more help, please don't hesitate to ask.

Best regards,
 

Related to Help with an Equivalence Relation?

1. What is an equivalence relation?

An equivalence relation is a mathematical concept that describes a relationship between two objects or elements that are considered equal or equivalent in some way. It is a type of binary relation that satisfies three conditions: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity.

2. How is an equivalence relation different from an equality relation?

An equivalence relation is a broader concept than an equality relation. While an equality relation only considers two elements that are exactly the same, an equivalence relation allows for elements that may have slight differences but are still considered equivalent in some way.

3. What are some examples of equivalence relations?

Some common examples of equivalence relations include:

  • Equality relation - where two objects are considered equal in all aspects
  • Similarity relation - where two objects have similar characteristics
  • Equivalence classes - where objects are grouped together based on some shared characteristic
  • Isomorphism relation - where two objects have the same structure

4. How can an equivalence relation be represented?

Equivalence relations can be represented in various ways, depending on the context. In mathematics, they are often represented using sets and mathematical notation to define the relationship between elements. In computer science, equivalence relations can be represented using data structures such as graphs or matrices.

5. What is the significance of equivalence relations in science?

Equivalence relations play a crucial role in many scientific fields, including mathematics, physics, and computer science. They allow for the classification and organization of complex concepts and objects, making it easier for scientists to understand and analyze them. Equivalence relations also help in the development of mathematical models and algorithms, which are essential in various scientific experiments and research.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
930
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top