Help with Canonical Poisson Brackets & EM Field

In summary, the Lagrangian for a particle moving in an eletromagnetic field is $$\mathcal{L}=\dfrac{m}{2}(\dot{x}^2_1+\dot{x}^2_2+\dot{x}^2_3)-q\varphi+\dfrac{q}{c}\vec{A}\cdot\dot{\vec{x}}.$$ The conjugated momenta of the generalized coordinates are: $$p_1=m\dot{x}_1-\dfrac{qB}{2c}x_2,$$ $$p_2=m\dot{x}_2+\df
  • #1
Matthew_
5
2
We were introduced the lagrangian for a particle moving in an eletromagnetic field (for context, this was a brief introduction before dealing with Zeeman effect) as $$\mathcal{L}=\dfrac{m}{2}(\dot{x}^2_1+\dot{x}^2_2+\dot{x}^2_3)-q\varphi+\dfrac{q}{c}\vec{A}\cdot\dot{\vec{x}}.$$ A "velocity-dependent generalized potential" appears. For a constant magnetic field oriented along the ##x_3## axis:$$\vec{A}=\frac{B}{2}(x_1\hat{u}_2-x_2\hat{u}_1).$$
Now, the conjugated momenta of the generalized coordinates are: $$p_1=m\dot{x}_1-\dfrac{qB}{2c}x_2,$$ $$p_2=m\dot{x}_2+\dfrac{qB}{2c}x_1,$$ $$p_3=m\dot{x}_3.$$
It was claimed that canonical poisson brackets hold, namely ##\left\{p_i,p_j\right\}=0##. I have no idea why this is the case tho, since the derivation of the lagrangian with respect of the generalized velocities gives a clear dependence between the coordinates and the adjoint momenta. Evaluating ##\left\{p_1,p_2\right\}## I think I should get something like (summation over j is omitted): $$\left\{p_1,p_2\right\}=\frac{\partial p_1}{\partial x_j}\frac{\partial p_2}{\partial p_j}-\frac{\partial p_1}{\partial p_j}\frac{\partial p_2}{\partial x_j}=\frac{\partial p_1}{\partial x_2}-\frac{\partial p_2}{\partial x_1}=-\frac{qB}{c}\neq 0.$$ Is there some reason why this does not work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The canonical Poisson brackets hold by definition, because for phase-space functions ##A## and ##B## by definition
$$\{A,B \}=\frac{\partial A}{\partial q_j} \frac{\partial B}{\partial p_j} - \frac{\partial B}{\partial q_j} \frac{\partial A}{\partial p_j}.$$
To calculate Poisson brackets you have to express all quantities with the ##q_j## and ##p_j## as independent variables, i.e., you have to eliminate the ##\dot{q}_j## using the ##p_j## and ##q_j## first. So it's the other way, i.e., now the Poisson brackets between the velocities are non-zero now. You have
$$\dot{\vec{x}}=\frac{1}{m}(\vec{p}-q \vec{A}/c),$$
i.e.,
$$[\dot{x}_j,\dot{x}_k]=\frac{1}{m^2} \left [-\frac{q}{c} \frac{\partial A_j}{\partial x_i} \delta_{ki} +\delta_{ij} \frac{q}{c} \frac{\partial A_k}{\partial x_i} \right] = \frac{q}{mc} \left (\frac{\partial A_k}{\partial x_j}-\frac{\partial A_j}{\partial x_i} \right) = \frac{q}{mc} \epsilon_{jki} B_i,$$
where I've used that ##\vec{B}=\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{A}##.

The Hamiltonian formulation is derived by first calculating the Hamiltonian as a function of the coordinates and canonical momenta,
$$H=\vec{x} \cdot \vec{p}-L=\frac{m}{2} \dot{\vec{x}}^2+q \varphi=\frac{1}{2m} (\vec{p}-q/c \vec{A})^2+q \varphi.$$
Then the equations of motion are the Hamilton canonical equations,
$$\dot{\vec{x}}=\frac{\partial H}{\partial \vec{p}} = \{\vec{x},H \}, \quad \dot{\vec{p}}=-\frac{\partial H}{\partial \vec{x}}=\{\vec{p},H \}.$$
Note that the canonical momenta ##\vec{p}## are not the mechanical momenta, ##\vec{\pi}=m \dot{\vec{x}}=\vec{p}-q \vec{A}/c##.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn and Matthew_
  • #3
vanhees71 said:
The canonical Poisson brackets hold by definition, because for phase-space functions ##A## and ##B## by definition
$$\{A,B \}=\frac{\partial A}{\partial q_j} \frac{\partial B}{\partial p_j} - \frac{\partial B}{\partial q_j} \frac{\partial A}{\partial p_j}.$$
To calculate Poisson brackets you have to express all quantities with the ##q_j## and ##p_j## as independent variables, i.e., you have to eliminate the ##\dot{q}_j## using the ##p_j## and ##q_j## first. So it's the other way, i.e., now the Poisson brackets between the velocities are non-zero now. You have
$$\dot{\vec{x}}=\frac{1}{m}(\vec{p}-q \vec{A}/c),$$
i.e.,
$$[\dot{x}_j,\dot{x}_k]=\frac{1}{m^2} \left [-\frac{q}{c} \frac{\partial A_j}{\partial x_i} \delta_{ki} +\delta_{ij} \frac{q}{c} \frac{\partial A_k}{\partial x_i} \right] = \frac{q}{mc} \left (\frac{\partial A_k}{\partial x_j}-\frac{\partial A_j}{\partial x_i} \right) = \frac{q}{mc} \epsilon_{jki} B_i,$$
where I've used that ##\vec{B}=\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{A}##.

The Hamiltonian formulation is derived by first calculating the Hamiltonian as a function of the coordinates and canonical momenta,
$$H=\vec{x} \cdot \vec{p}-L=\frac{m}{2} \dot{\vec{x}}^2+q \varphi=\frac{1}{2m} (\vec{p}-q/c \vec{A})^2+q \varphi.$$
Then the equations of motion are the Hamilton canonical equations,
$$\dot{\vec{x}}=\frac{\partial H}{\partial \vec{p}} = \{\vec{x},H \}, \quad \dot{\vec{p}}=-\frac{\partial H}{\partial \vec{x}}=\{\vec{p},H \}.$$
Note that the canonical momenta ##\vec{p}## are not the mechanical momenta, ##\vec{\pi}=m \dot{\vec{x}}=\vec{p}-q \vec{A}/c##.
Thank you, this was illuminating
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71

FAQ: Help with Canonical Poisson Brackets & EM Field

What are canonical Poisson brackets?

Canonical Poisson brackets are mathematical expressions used in classical mechanics to describe the time evolution of a dynamical system. They are defined for two functions, \( f \) and \( g \), in terms of their partial derivatives with respect to the generalized coordinates \( q_i \) and conjugate momenta \( p_i \): \( \{f, g\} = \sum_i \left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial q_i} \frac{\partial g}{\partial p_i} - \frac{\partial f}{\partial p_i} \frac{\partial g}{\partial q_i} \right) \).

How do Poisson brackets relate to the electromagnetic field?

In the context of an electromagnetic field, Poisson brackets are used to describe the dynamics of charged particles interacting with the field. The Hamiltonian for a charged particle in an electromagnetic field includes terms involving the vector potential \( \mathbf{A} \) and the scalar potential \( \phi \). The Poisson brackets help in deriving the equations of motion for the particle's position and momentum, taking into account the influence of the electromagnetic field.

What is the significance of canonical transformations in relation to Poisson brackets?

Canonical transformations are changes of coordinates in phase space that preserve the form of Hamilton's equations. They are significant because they leave the Poisson brackets invariant. This means that if \( \{q_i, p_j\} = \delta_{ij} \) in the original coordinates, the same relation holds in the new coordinates. Canonical transformations are useful for simplifying problems and finding conserved quantities in dynamical systems.

Can you explain the role of gauge invariance in the context of Poisson brackets and the electromagnetic field?

Gauge invariance is a fundamental property of electromagnetic fields that states the physical observables are unchanged under certain transformations of the vector potential \( \mathbf{A} \) and scalar potential \( \phi \). In the context of Poisson brackets, gauge invariance ensures that the equations of motion derived using these brackets are consistent with the physical invariance of the system. This is crucial for maintaining the consistency of the theoretical framework used to describe the interaction of charged particles with electromagnetic fields.

How can one derive the Hamiltonian for a charged particle in an electromagnetic field using Poisson brackets?

To derive the Hamiltonian for a charged particle in an electromagnetic field, one starts with the Lagrangian that includes the kinetic energy and the interaction with the electromagnetic potentials. The generalized momenta are defined as \( p_i = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q_i}} \). The Hamiltonian is then obtained by performing a Legendre transformation: \( H = \sum_i p_i

Back
Top