Help with Proof: Integrate between Region Boundaries

  • Thread starter Kuma
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Proof
In summary, The conversation is discussing a homework question about proving a statement and the use of polar transformations. The participants suggest thinking about the range of the integrand and using a theorem to show that the final integral solution lies between two numbers. They also mention the possibility of using a polar transformation or approximating the integral using boxes. The conversation ends with a clarification about the applicability of polar transformations to rectangles.
  • #1
Kuma
134
0

Homework Statement



Hi. I have been given the following question.

Show that this is true:

3YQQ1.png


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Well I drew out the region and the bounds. I'm pretty sure that it isn't possible to integrate this because no matter the order, I need either an x or a y in there to do a substitution. So I'm guessing that I just have to show in some way that the final integral solution will lie between those two numbers, but I don't know how to approach this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Think about how large and how small the integrand can be on that domain.
 
  • #3
Try your luck with a polar transformation if you want to save time on the integral.
 
  • #4
I didn't do polar transformations yet.

That domain is a square, but how can i find how large it can be without knowing the integral?
 
  • #5
You can't use a polar transformation, because the domain is a finite rectangle.
 
  • #6
ex2 + y2 will have its largest value at one of the corner points of the region. Similarly, this function will have its smallest value at another of the corner points.
 
  • #7
Mark44 said:
ex2 + y2 will have its largest value at one of the corner points of the region. Similarly, this function will have its smallest value at another of the corner points.

Makes sense, but I'm not sure how i can show that without doing the integral itself.
 
  • #8
You DON'T need to calculate the integral. This problem is basically an extension of the ideas behind approximating an integral using a Riemann sum. Instead of using rectangles to get an upper and lower estimate for the area beneath a curve, here you're using boxes to get upper and lower estimates for the volume beneath a surface.
 
  • #9
dextercioby said:
You can't use a polar transformation, because the domain is a finite rectangle.

Actually, to be pedantic, he could use a polar transformation if he had studied that, but it would be pointless and wouldn't help.

@Kuma: Use the theorem if m ≤ f(x,y) ≤ M on a region R then
[tex]m\cdot Area(R) \le \iint_R f(x,y)\, dydx\le M\cdot Area(R)[/tex]
 
  • #10
The polar transformation is applicable to subsets of disks, not to rectangles. For rectangles, cartesian coordinates are valid.
 
  • #11
dexter, you can use polar coordinates over whatever domain you choose, it's just going to be hard to write down the limits of the inside integral
 

FAQ: Help with Proof: Integrate between Region Boundaries

What does "integrating between region boundaries" mean?

Integrating between region boundaries refers to the process of finding the area under a curve between two specific points, or boundaries, on the x-axis. This is done by using integration, a mathematical technique that involves finding the antiderivative of a function and evaluating it at the given boundaries.

Why is it important to integrate between region boundaries?

Integrating between region boundaries allows us to find the area under a curve, which has many real-world applications. For example, it can be used to calculate the volume of a three-dimensional object or to determine the work done by a varying force. It is also a fundamental concept in calculus and is used to solve many mathematical problems.

What are the different methods for integrating between region boundaries?

There are several methods for integrating between region boundaries, including the Riemann sum method, the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, and the Method of Substitution. These methods involve different techniques for finding the antiderivative of a function and evaluating it at the given boundaries.

How do I know which method to use when integrating between region boundaries?

The method used for integrating between region boundaries depends on the complexity of the function and the specific boundaries given. It is important to have a good understanding of the different methods and their applications in order to choose the most appropriate one for a given problem. Practice and experience will also help in determining the best method to use.

What are some common mistakes to avoid when integrating between region boundaries?

Some common mistakes to avoid when integrating between region boundaries include using the wrong method, forgetting to include the constant of integration, and making errors in calculating the antiderivative. It is important to carefully follow the steps for each method and double-check all calculations to ensure accuracy.

Similar threads

Back
Top