Help with provinga simple algebraic equation?

  • Thread starter cshum00
  • Start date
In summary, the student is trying to solve two equations that seem to be related to each other but do not seem to be able to solve them separately. The student has tried adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing values but has not been able to solve the equations.
  • #1
cshum00
215
0

Homework Statement


[itex]ar_1 = b <=> r_1 = \frac{b}{a}[/itex] (equation1)
[itex]cr_d = c <=> r_2 = \frac{d}{c}[/itex] (equation2)
[itex]ar_1 + cr_2 = b + c <=> r_1 + r_2 = \frac{b}{a} + \frac{d}{c}[/itex] (add equation1 and equation2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I am trying to make the equation on the left equals to the equation on the right side. I have tried adding, subtracting and dividing values, also multiplying and dividing conjugates but nothing works.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I do not understand something with the second equation.

Should it be

[itex]
cr_2 = d <=> r_2 = \frac{d}{c}
[/itex]
?

What do you need to prove? What is the original text of the task?
 
  • #3
I have 2 equations.
[itex]ar_1 = b[/itex] (equation1)
and [itex]cr_d = c[/itex] (equation2)

i just divided by 'a' in both sides in equation1
and divided by 'c' in both sides in equation2
so i get
[itex]r_1 = \frac{b}{a}[/itex] (equation1)
[itex]r_2 = \frac{d}{c}[/itex] (equation2)

but they are both reversible so
[itex]ar_1 = b <=> r_1 = \frac{b}{a}[/itex] (equation1)
[itex]cr_d = c <=> r_2 = \frac{d}{c}[/itex] (equation2)

if i add both equations i get:
[itex]ar_1 + cr_2 = b + c <=> r_1 + r_2 = \frac{b}{a} + \frac{d}{c}[/itex]
since both of the equations are the same, so should the sum be
and that is what i am trying to prove.

Any numerical examples i try, both expressions seem to be the same except for 'a' and 'c' equals to zero.
 
  • #4
cshum00 said:

Homework Statement


[itex]ar_1 = b <=> r_1 = \frac{b}{a}[/itex] (equation1)
[itex]cr_d = c <=> r_2 = \frac{d}{c}[/itex] (equation2)
[itex]ar_1 + cr_2 = b + c <=> r_1 + r_2 = \frac{b}{a} + \frac{d}{c}[/itex] (add equation1 and equation2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I am trying to make the equation on the left equals to the equation on the right side. I have tried adding, subtracting and dividing values, also multiplying and dividing conjugates but nothing works.
You can't prove it, it isn't true. Knowing that [itex]ar_1+ br_2= b+ c[/itex] does NOT tell you that [itex]ar_1= b[/itex] and [itex]ar_2= c[/itex] separately.

Knowing the two things [itex]ar_1= b[/itex] and [itex]cr_d= c[/itex] tells you, by adding the equations, that [itex]ar_1+ cr_d= b+ c[/itex] but knowing that single fact, that [itex]ar_1+ cr_d= b+ c[/itex] does NOT tell you the two things.

For example, If x= 3 and y= 2 then x+ y= 5. But knowing only that x+y= 5 does NOT tell you that x= 3 and y= 2.
 
  • #5
Then what about this case?

The parametric equation of a ellipse is:
[itex]x = acos \theta[/itex]
[itex]y = bsin \theta[/itex]

I first square both equations so I get:
[itex]x^2 = a^2cos^2 \theta[/itex] (1)
[itex]y^2 = b^2sin^2 \theta[/itex] (2)

Then for equation (1) divide by a^2 and equation (2) divide by b^2:
[itex]\frac{x^2}{a^2} = cos^2 \theta[/itex] (3)
[itex]\frac{y^2}{b^2} = sin^2 \theta[/itex] (4)

So if i were to add equations (1) and (2) i would get:
[itex]x^2 + y^2 = a^2cos^2 \theta + b^2sin^2 \theta[/itex] (5)
And adding equation (3) and (4)
[itex]\frac{x^2}{a^2} + \frac{y^2}{b^2} = cos^2 \theta + sin^2 \theta[/itex] (6)

Then putting them in my format i would get:
[itex]x^2 + y^2 = a^2cos^2 \theta + b^2sin^2 \theta <=>[/itex]
[itex]\frac{x^2}{a^2} + \frac{y^2}{b^2} = cos^2 \theta + sin^2 \theta[/itex]

Which both are equations of the ellipse the only difference is that one I can remove
the third variable of [itex]\theta[/itex] by using the trigonometry identity of [itex]sin^2\theta + cos^2\theta=1[/itex].
 
  • #6
cshum00 said:
Then what about this case?

The parametric equation of a ellipse is:
[itex]x = acos \theta[/itex]
[itex]y = bsin \theta[/itex]

I first square both equations so I get:
[itex]x^2 = a^2cos^2 \theta[/itex] (1)
[itex]y^2 = b^2sin^2 \theta[/itex] (2)

Then for equation (1) divide by a^2 and equation (2) divide by b^2:
[itex]\frac{x^2}{a^2} = cos^2 \theta[/itex] (3)
[itex]\frac{y^2}{b^2} = sin^2 \theta[/itex] (4)

So if i were to add equations (1) and (2) i would get:
[itex]x^2 + y^2 = a^2cos^2 \theta + b^2sin^2 \theta[/itex] (5)
And adding equation (3) and (4)
[itex]\frac{x^2}{a^2} + \frac{y^2}{b^2} = cos^2 \theta + sin^2 \theta[/itex] (6)

Then putting them in my format i would get:
[itex]x^2 + y^2 = a^2cos^2 \theta + b^2sin^2 \theta <=>[/itex]
[itex]\frac{x^2}{a^2} + \frac{y^2}{b^2} = cos^2 \theta + sin^2 \theta[/itex]

Which both are equations of the ellipse the only difference is that one I can remove
the third variable of [itex]\theta[/itex] by using the trigonometry identity of [itex]sin^2\theta + cos^2\theta=1[/itex].
It's fairly simple to go from the parametric equations for an ellipse
[itex]x = acos \theta[/itex]
[itex]y = bsin \theta[/itex]

to the Cartesian form:
[tex]x^2/a^2 + y^2/b^2 = 1[/tex]
You almost got to this form using way too many steps.

Your original equations were garbled and, I believe, confused several people responding. As far as I can tell, your equations should have been:
[tex]ar_1 = b[/tex]
[tex]cr_2 = d[/tex]
[tex]ar_1 + cr_2 = b + d[/tex]
(For your second equation you had [itex]cr_d = c[/itex] which I'm nearly certain is an error. Even though Дьявол asked you whether this was an oversight, you didn't respond to him and persisted with the erroneous equation.)
Your 3rd equation essentially says that b + d = b + d, which is trivially true. There is no way to divide the first term in the third equation by a and the second term by c. IOW, you can't transform your third equation to [itex]r_1 + r_2 = <whatever>[/itex]
 
  • #7
Ya the second line was an error. I should have been [itex]cr_2 = d <=> r_2 = \frac{d}{c}[/itex].

Sorry Дьявол. I did not notice that. And because i didn't notice, i was confused by his question of what needed to be proven; also copied the equations wrong for the second time.

Ya, the ellipse it just an simple example. I tried to write it in general form at the beginning. So going back to the general examples, if you actually try to plug some numbers you see that in the third equation both sides are the same except for "a" and "c" = 0.
 

FAQ: Help with provinga simple algebraic equation?

How can I prove a simple algebraic equation?

The most common way to prove a simple algebraic equation is by using mathematical induction. This involves showing that the equation holds true for a base case, and then proving that it also holds true for the next case, and so on until the entire equation is proven.

What is the importance of proving algebraic equations?

Proving algebraic equations is important because it helps us understand the fundamental principles of mathematics and how they are applied in different contexts. It also allows us to ensure the accuracy and validity of mathematical statements.

Can I use any method to prove an algebraic equation?

While there are different methods for proving algebraic equations, not all methods may be applicable or appropriate for every equation. It is important to understand the principles and limitations of each method in order to choose the most effective one for a specific equation.

What are some common mistakes to avoid when proving algebraic equations?

One common mistake is assuming that a specific equation or statement is true without providing a valid proof. Another mistake is using incorrect or invalid mathematical operations or properties. It is important to carefully follow the rules and guidelines of mathematical proofs to avoid these errors.

Are there any tips for making the process of proving algebraic equations easier?

One helpful tip is to break down the equation into smaller parts or steps, and prove each part separately before combining them into a complete proof. It is also useful to practice regularly and seek help from others if needed. Additionally, understanding the underlying concepts and principles of algebra can make the process of proving equations easier.

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
968
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top