Hey guys, I'm going to say right up front that I haven't a c

In summary, the conversation is about a person requesting help with calculating the force and potential rollover of a compact car involved in a 3-car accident. They provide the weights and speeds of each car, as well as estimated impact damage. However, the expert summarizer notes that they do not provide further information or analysis as accidents are too complex to accurately calculate without the help of a specialist.
  • #1
Mychele Goodwin
1
0
Hey guys, I'm going to say right up front that I haven't a clue how to do these calculations, but I have a scenario that I would like the math to if anyone can help me figure it out. What I had been able to attempt to figure out doesn't seem tangible? The formulas I had researched/used was KE=0.5mv^2 and F= mass* acceleration/time* proportionality constant. In the scenario I will supply both the US customary system and the metric system so you can choose what set of numbers you'd prefer to work with. I am willing to do my own math as well, so if you could tell me which formulas I need, I can go from there!

Here goes:

Imagine that there is a 3 car accident. A compact car (2,425.1 lbs./1,100 kg) is making a left turn at 35 mph/56.327 km per hour. The car is hit on its side, just behind the passenger door, by a midsize car (3,154 lbs./1,430.63 kg) traveling at 44 mph/70.81 km per hour. Then a midsize SUV (4,094 lbs./1,857.01 kg) barrels through going 57 mph/91.73 km per hour. A rough estimate of impact damage to each vehicle is as follows: Compact Car (5ft./1.524m), Midsize Car (Front-4ft./1.2192m, Back-6ft./1.8288m), and the Midsize SUV (6ft./1.8288m).

Now here's my question(s); 1) How much force (force of impact) would be applied to the compact car from the overall collision, and 2) Would that impact send the compact car into a rollover, and if so how far would it travel?

If any other information is needed, let me know and I'll do my best to supply that. I know there are a lot of factors that can go into a car accident of this caliber, but I only need a generalization. This is a topic I had always been curious about. Thanks in advance you guys!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I'm sorry but we don't allow traffic accident analysis here. Accidents are far too complex to reliably analyze. Please contact a specialist if you are in need of an analysis.
 

FAQ: Hey guys, I'm going to say right up front that I haven't a c

What does "Hey guys, I'm going to say right up front that I haven't a c" mean?

This phrase is commonly used as an introduction to a statement or message in which the speaker wants to make it clear that they do not have a specific answer or solution. It is a way of acknowledging that the speaker may not have all the information or expertise on a topic, but still wants to share their thoughts or perspective.

Why do people use this phrase?

People use this phrase to be honest and transparent about their limitations. It can also be used as a way of humbly asking for others' input or opinions on a topic.

Is this phrase grammatically correct?

Yes, the phrase is grammatically correct. The word "c" is most likely a placeholder for a word that the speaker does not know or cannot remember at the moment.

Can this phrase be used in a professional setting?

It depends on the context and the company culture. In some industries or workplaces, this phrase may be seen as too informal or unprofessional. It is always best to use clear and concise language in a professional setting.

What is the best way to respond to someone who uses this phrase?

You can respond by acknowledging their honesty and thanking them for their input. If you have any relevant information or ideas to contribute, you can also share them in a respectful manner.

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
11K
Replies
33
Views
14K
Back
Top