MHB High school inequality |2−(−1)n−l|≥a

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the existence of a positive constant \( a \) such that for any natural number \( k \), there exists an integer \( n \) greater than or equal to \( k \) satisfying the inequality \( |2 - (-1)^n - l| \geq a \). Participants clarify that for any integer \( n \), the expression \( (-1)^n \) results in either 1 or -1, leading to two cases for the absolute value: \( |1 - l| \) or \( |3 - l| \). The consensus is that both odd and even integers exist beyond any given \( k \), supporting the claim. The discussion emphasizes the need for a clearer understanding of the inequality's implications. Overall, the mathematical premise is deemed valid with proper interpretation.
solakis1
Messages
407
Reaction score
0
Given any real No $$l$$,then prove,that there exist $$a>0$$ such that ,for all natural Nos $$k$$ there exist $$n\geq k$$
such that:

$$|2-(-1)^n-l|\geq a$$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Frankly, that doesn't make much sense. For any integer, n, (-1)^n is either 1 (n even) or -1 (n odd). So |2- (-1)^n- l| is either |2- 1- l|= |1- l| or |2+ 1- l|= |3- l|. Of course there exist both odd and even numbers larger than any given k.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Frankly, that doesn't make much sense. For any integer, n, (-1)^n is either 1 (n even) or -1 (n odd). So |2- (-1)^n- l| is either |2- 1- l|= |1- l| or |2+ 1- l|= |3- l|. Of course there exist both odd and even numbers larger than any given k.

Given any $$l$$ the OP is looking for $$a>0$$,such that:

$$\forall k(k\in N\Longrightarrow\exists n(n\geq k\wedge |2-(-1)^n-l|\geq a))$$

Does it make sense now ??
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top