MHB Holly's questions at Yahoo Answers regarding Lagrange multipliers

AI Thread Summary
Holly seeks assistance with Lagrange multipliers for two calculus problems involving optimization with constraints. The first problem involves minimizing the function f(x,y) = x^2 + y^2 under the constraint x + 2y - 20 = 0, leading to a minimum at the point (4,8) with a value of 80. The second problem focuses on maximizing f(x,y) = √(99 - x^2 - y^2) with the constraint x + y - 10 = 0, resulting in a maximum at (5,5) with a value of 7. Evaluations at alternative points confirm these extrema. The discussion effectively illustrates the application of Lagrange multipliers in solving constrained optimization problems.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here are the questions:

Calculus 3 Lagrange multipliers help?


Okay I CANNOT figure out lagrange multipliers. Can anyone help me with my homework problems? Thanks!

1.

Use Lagrange multipliers to find the indicated extrema, assuming that x and y are positive.
minimize f(x,y)= x^2 + y ^2
constraint: x+ 2y - 20 = 0

2.
Use Lagrange multipliers to find the indicated extrema, assuming that x and y are positive.

Maximize f(x,y) = (99 - x^2 - y^2)^(1/2)
constraint: x + y - 10 = 0

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Holly,

1.) We are given the objective function:

$$f(x,y)=x^2+y^2$$

subject to the constraint:

$$g(x,y)=x+2y-20=0$$

Lagrange multipliers gives rise then to the following system:

$$2x=\lambda(1)$$

$$2y=\lambda(2)$$

This implies:

$$\lambda=2x=y$$

Substituting for $y$ into the constraint, we find:

$$x+2(2x)-20=0\implies x=4\implies y=8$$

Thus, we obtain the critical point:

$$(x,y)=(4,8)$$

The objective function's value at this point is:

$$f(4,8)=4^2+8^2=80$$

To ensure this is a minimum, let's evaluate the objective function at another point on the constraint, such as $$(x,y)=(2,9)$$:

$$f(2,9)=2^2+9^2=85$$

And so we may now conclude:

$$f_{\min}=f(4,8)=80$$

2.) We are given the objective function:

$$f(x,y)=\sqrt{99-x^2-y^2}$$

subject to the constraint:

$$g(x,y)=x+y-10=0$$

Now here we see that $x$ and $y$ have cyclic symmetry, that is, we may switch the two variables and still have the same objective function and constraint. Thus we know the critical value may be obtained when $x=y$. The constraint then gives us:

$$x=y=5$$

And so our critical point is:

$$(x,y)=(5,5)$$

The objective function's value at this point is:

$$f(5,5)=\sqrt{99-5^2-5^2}=7$$

To ensure this is a maximum, let's evaluate the objective function at another point on the constraint, such as $$(x,y)=(4,6)$$:

$$f(5,5)=\sqrt{99-4^2-6^2}=\sqrt{47}<7$$

And so we may conclude:

$$f_{\max}=f(5,5)=7$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top