Horific new weapon being used to soften up iran

  • Thread starter mgb_phys
  • Start date
In summary, singer De Burgh is planning to perform a concert in Iran, which some may see as violating the Geneva Convention. However, the convention primarily concerns the treatment of POWs and does not ban concerts. Some people have a guilty pleasure for De Burgh's songs, including "Don't Pay the Ferryman" and "Manah Manah," and even suggest having them surgically removed. However, there is a risk of being exposed to other cheesy songs, such as those by Bryan Adams and Air Supply.
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
  • #3
:smile: Hey, I like the song "Don't Pay the Ferryman"! (I'm a hopeless kid of the '80s.)
 
  • #4
KingOrdo said:
No. The "Genva [sic] Convention" concerns, primarily, the treatment of POWs.
Wooosh!

Some of DeBurgh's songs are my guilty pleasures. Years ago a few of his songs got stuck in my head. I was unable to get them out and eventually they broke me down. I've come to actually appreciate and even enjoy them now from time to time. I chalk it up to Stockhom Syndrome.

Manah Manah
 
  • #5
Huckleberry said:
...Years ago a few of his songs got stuck in my head. I was unable to get them out ...
Have them surgically removed, it's worth the pain and lengthy recovery period.
 
  • #6
Artman said:
Have them surgically removed, it's worth the pain and lengthy recovery period.
Remember to keep the dressing on until it has fully healed, otherwise some Bryan Adams songs can get in.
 
  • #7
mgb_phys said:
Remember to keep the dressing on until it has fully healed, otherwise some Bryan Adams songs can get in.
I'm more worried about exposing it to Air Supply. I don't want a clot in my Type O Negative. So Far So Good.
 

FAQ: Horific new weapon being used to soften up iran

What is the horrific new weapon being used to soften up Iran?

The horrific new weapon being used to soften up Iran is a highly advanced and powerful form of cyber warfare.

How does this new weapon work?

This new weapon works by infiltrating and attacking Iran's computer systems, causing disruption and damage to their infrastructure.

Who is responsible for creating and using this weapon?

The creator and user of this weapon is currently unknown, but it is believed to be a government or military entity with advanced technological capabilities.

What are the potential consequences of using this weapon?

The potential consequences of using this weapon include widespread chaos and disruption in Iran, as well as potential retaliation and escalation of hostilities between countries.

Is there any defense against this weapon?

There are measures that can be taken to mitigate the effects of this weapon, such as increasing cybersecurity measures and developing countermeasures. However, there is no guarantee of complete defense against such a powerful weapon.

Similar threads

  • Poll
News Speculation mounting of an attack on Iran
4
Replies
124
Views
16K
News Prominent U.S. Physicists Send Letter to President Bush
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
News What do you do with a problem like Ahmadinejad?
15
Replies
490
Views
38K
News What were the consequences of Israel's attack on the Gaza Aid Flotilla?
16
Replies
531
Views
68K
News So, the question is: Are US Forces Using Illegal Chemical Weapons in Iraq?
3
Replies
76
Views
8K
News What If Iran Announced They Had Nuclear Weapons?
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
Starfield: New First-Person Epic Role-Playing Game by BGS
Replies
9
Views
2K
News Iran's nukes: posturing and playground politics.
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
News What are the potential consequences of occupying Iran?
6
Replies
193
Views
22K
News Did the US Use White Phosphorus as a Weapon in Falluja?
4
Replies
113
Views
12K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top