- #1
tom8
- 19
- 0
Hello,
Please see this pdf at some universities website:
http://physics.ucsc.edu/~peter/110A/helmholtz.pdf
In line 14 the author claims using integration by parts...I do not understand
who could the integration by parts be used here.
I understand the general case where we have der(a*b)=a der(b) + b der(a)
but I am not able to see how this happened here..
Thanks!
Please see this pdf at some universities website:
http://physics.ucsc.edu/~peter/110A/helmholtz.pdf
In line 14 the author claims using integration by parts...I do not understand
who could the integration by parts be used here.
I understand the general case where we have der(a*b)=a der(b) + b der(a)
but I am not able to see how this happened here..
Thanks!