How are equations used to derive the final solution in this image?

In summary, equations are used to derive the final solution in this image by representing the relationship between different variables and using mathematical operations to solve for the desired value. By plugging in known values and manipulating the equations, the final solution can be calculated. This process is commonly used in various fields such as physics, engineering, and mathematics to analyze and solve complex problems. The image likely shows a step-by-step process of using equations to reach the final solution, demonstrating the importance and versatility of equations in problem-solving.
  • #1
exidez
44
0
In the attached image, how are equations 1, 2, 3 and 4 used to come to the final equation of 5 and 6? I am suspecting it has something to do with the derivative with respect to t, but I don't know how they remove it to get the final solution. Am I missing something incredibly simple that is not worth mentioning in the text?

The image was taken from http://www.r8sac.org/files/SPC/bugeja.pdf if further information is needed.
 

Attachments

  • InvertedPend.jpg
    InvertedPend.jpg
    42.3 KB · Views: 457
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
ahhh of course they are!

Why do i always forget the fundamentals!
 
  • #4
Ok so now I am lost again.. I tried...

If i just work out one, i can get the other but i still can't get the one..

[itex]\frac{d^2}{dt^2}(x+Lsin(\theta))[/itex]

First working out the first derivative

[itex]\frac{d}{dt}(x+Lsin(\theta)) = \frac{d}{d\theta}\frac{d\theta}{dt}(x+Lsin(\theta))[/itex]

[itex]\frac{d}{dt}(x+Lsin(\theta)) = \frac{d\theta}{dt}Lcos(\theta)[/itex]

So the second derivative is:


[itex]\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{d\theta}{dt}Lcos(\theta))[/itex]

[itex]\frac{d\theta}{dt}\frac{d}{d\theta}(\frac{d\theta}{dt}Lcos(\theta))[/itex]

Using the product rule:

[itex]\frac{d\theta}{dt}(\frac{d}{d\theta}(\frac{d\theta}{dt})Lcos(\theta)-\frac{d\theta}{dt}Lsin(\theta))[/itex]


[itex]\frac{d}{d\theta}(\dot{\theta})\dot{\theta}Lcos( \theta)-\dot{\theta}^{2}Lsin(\theta))[/itex]

This isn't quite the answer I am supposed to get..
its supposed to be:

[itex]L\ddot{\theta}cos(\theta) - \dot{ \theta}^{2}Lsin(\theta))[/itex]

close but no cigar... any clues on where i went wrong or maybe there is something further with the derivative of theta dot with respect to theta??

Your help is much appreciated
 
  • #5
hi exidez! :smile:

i think you're making things unnecessarily difficult by trying to do d/dθ (θ') …

you can just do d/dt (θ') = θ'' :wink:

d/dt (sinθ) = θ' d/dθ (sinθ) = θ'cosθ

d/dt (θ'cosθ) = θ''cosθ + θ' d/dt(cosθ) = θ''cosθ + θ' θ' d/dθ(cosθ)

= θ''cosθ - θ'2 sinθ :smile:
 
  • #6
Thanks tiny-tim,

I understand it correctly now and i have the matching answer but with one tiny problems..

If you look at equation 5 and 6they have a multiplyer at the front being 1/(I+L^2m) and 1/(M+m) respectively

however, when in my answers they are simply 1/I and 1/M respectively as that is what the rearranged equations 3 and 4 give.. I did not get any division from chain/product rule that can give this answer...

Do you know how they derived the I+L^2m or M+m on the numerator ??
 
  • #7
hi exidez! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
exidez said:
If you look at equation 5 and 6they have a multiplyer at the front being 1/(I+L^2m) and 1/(M+m) respectively

however, when in my answers they are simply 1/I and 1/M respectively as that is what the rearranged equations 3 and 4 give..

show us how you got that :smile:
 
  • #8
it would be faster if i just took a photo of my working

I changed the variable of M to Mc to ensure i wasnt getting mixed up with m. They are two different masses. A little messy but you can see how i got 1/I and 1/M...
 

Attachments

  • P1012483.jpg
    P1012483.jpg
    22.3 KB · Views: 416
  • #9
in your left-hand column (the x'' equation), you've lost the extra x'' terms between lines 4 and 5

in your right-hand column, a lot seems to have gone missing …

it would be easier to check if you would type it out :redface:
 
  • #10
The two equations:

[itex]F-H=M\ddot{x}+k\dot{x})[/itex]

[itex]H=m\frac{d^{2}}{dt^{2}}(x-Lsin(\theta))[/itex]

Derivation:

[itex]\ddot{x}=\frac{1}{M}(F-H-k\dot{x})[/itex]

[itex]\ddot{x}=\frac{1}{M}(F-m\frac{d^{2}}{dt^{2}}(x-Lsin(\theta))-k\dot{x})[/itex]

[itex]\ddot{x}=\frac{1}{M}(F-m\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{d}{dt}(x+Lsin(\theta)))-k\dot{x})[/itex]

[itex]\ddot{x}=\frac{1}{M}(F-m\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{d \theta}{dt}\frac{d}{d \theta}(x+Lsin(\theta)))-k\dot{x})[/itex]

[itex]\ddot{x}=\frac{1}{M}(F-m\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{d \theta}{dt}(Lcos(\theta)))-k\dot{x})[/itex][itex]\ddot{x}=\frac{1}{M}(F-m\frac{d}{dt}(\dot{\theta}Lcos(\theta))-k\dot{x})[/itex]

[itex]\ddot{x}=\frac{1}{M}(F-m\ddot{\theta}Lcos(\theta)+m\dot{\theta}\frac{d}{dt}(Lcos(\theta))-k\dot{x})[/itex]

[itex]\ddot{x}=\frac{1}{M}(F-m\ddot{\theta}Lcos(\theta)+m\dot{\theta}^{2}\frac{d }{d\theta}(Lcos(\theta))-k\dot{x})[/itex][itex]\ddot{x}=\frac{1}{M}(F-m\ddot{\theta}Lcos(\theta)-m\dot{\theta}^{2}Lsin(\theta)-k\dot{x})[/itex][itex]\ddot{x}=\frac{1}{M}(F-mL(\ddot{\theta}cos(\theta)-\dot{\theta}^{2}sin(\theta))-k\dot{x})[/itex]

The text says it should be:

[itex]\ddot{x}=\frac{1}{M+m}(F-mL(\ddot{\theta}cos(\theta)-\dot{\theta}^{2}sin(\theta))-k\dot{x})[/itex]

the same issue is with the theta double dot. So what ever i am doing wrong here is the same issue with theta double dot. I will type the theta dot out in the next post
 
  • #11
The Two equations:

[itex]V-mg=m\frac{d^{2}}{dt^{2}}(Lcos(\theta))[/itex]

[itex]I\ddot{\theta}+c\dot{\theta}=VLsin(\theta)-HLcos(\theta)[/itex]

Derevation:

[itex]\ddot{\theta}=\frac{1}{I}(VLsin(\theta)-HLcos(\theta)-c\dot{\theta})[/itex]

[itex]\ddot{\theta}=\frac{1}{I}(VLsin(\theta)-HLcos(\theta)-c\dot{\theta})[/itex]

[itex]V=m\frac{d^{2}}{dt^{2}}(Lcos(\theta))+mg[/itex]

[itex]V=m\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{d}{dt}(Lcos(\theta)))+mg[/itex]

[itex]V=m\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{dx}{dt}\frac{d}{dx}(Lcos( \theta)))+mg[/itex]

[itex]V=m\frac{d}{dt}(0)+mg[/itex]

[itex]V=mg[/itex]

[itex]H=m\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{d}{dt}(x+Lsin(\theta)))[/itex]

[itex]H=m\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{dx}{dt}\frac{d}{dx}((x+Lsin(\theta))))[/itex]

[itex]H=m\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{dx}{dt}(1+0))[/itex]

[itex]H=m\frac{d}{dt}(\dot{x}(1+0))[/itex]

[itex]H=m\frac{d}{dt}(\dot{x})[/itex]

[itex]H=m\ddot{x}[/itex]

Now sub new H and V into theta double dot:

[itex]\ddot{\theta}=\frac{1}{I}(mgLsin(\theta)-m\ddot{x}Lcos(\theta)-c\dot{\theta})[/itex][itex]\ddot{\theta}=\frac{1}{I}(mL(gsin(\theta)-\ddot{x}cos(\theta))-c\dot{\theta})[/itex]

The text says it should be:[itex]\ddot{\theta}=\frac{1}{I+L^{2}m}(mL(gsin(\theta)-\ddot{x}cos(\theta))-c\dot{\theta})[/itex]
 
  • #12
ah, this is where you're going wrong …
exidez said:
[itex]\ddot{x}=\frac{1}{M}(F-m\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{d}{dt}(x+Lsin(\theta)))-k\dot{x})[/itex]

[itex]\ddot{x}=\frac{1}{M}(F-m\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{d \theta}{dt}\frac{d}{d \theta}(x+Lsin(\theta)))-k\dot{x})[/itex]

you're replacing d/dt (x) by θ' d/dθ (x), which comes out as zero …

you can't do that!

i] d/dt (x) is x', no need to involve θ at all

ii] the chain rule only works if (in this case) x is a function of θ, and it isn't

try again, just putting d/dt (x) = x' :smile:
 
  • #13
ahhhhh yes. Then i get a term involving [itex]\ddot{x}[/itex], take it over the other side, factor the common [itex]\ddot{x}[/itex] out and take what is in the bracket on the other side.

I got the correct answer now! Also For the [itex]\ddot{\theta}[/itex].
Thank a lot for you help. It is greatly appreciated! I had learned and revised a lot just going through this understanding. Thanks again
 

FAQ: How are equations used to derive the final solution in this image?

What is equation substitution?

Equation substitution is a mathematical method used to solve systems of equations by replacing one variable with an equivalent expression.

Why is equation substitution useful?

Equation substitution is useful because it simplifies complex systems of equations and makes it easier to find the values of the variables.

When should equation substitution be used?

Equation substitution should be used when there are two or more equations with the same number of variables and at least one of the equations can be solved for a single variable.

What are the steps for using equation substitution?

The steps for using equation substitution are: 1) Solve one of the equations for a single variable, 2) Substitute the expression for that variable into the other equations, 3) Solve the resulting equation, and 4) Substitute the value back into the original equation to find the other variable.

Can equation substitution be used to solve any type of system of equations?

No, equation substitution can only be used to solve systems of equations with the same number of variables. It is not suitable for solving systems with unequal numbers of variables or equations.

Similar threads

Back
Top