How Can a Single Vector Represent Multi-Dimensional Quantum Information?

  • Thread starter snoopies622
  • Start date
In summary, a vector in an infinite-dimensional space can be thought of as a function of one continuous variable in that both are a list of numbers (complex numbers in the case of quantum mechanics) that is infinitely long. However, since wave functions in the position basis are functions of three dimensions (three continuous variables), how is all that information represented with only one vector?
  • #1
snoopies622
846
28
I see how a vector in an infinite-dimensional space can be thought of as a function of one continuous variable in that both are a list of numbers (complex numbers in the case of quantum mechanics) that is infinitely long. But since wave functions in the position basis are functions of three dimensions (three continuous variables), how is all that information represented with only one vector?

Thanks.

(Edit) Afterthought: since momentum in three-dimensional space has three components, I guess this applies to the momentum basis too.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Cheating: In 2D, discretize each space dimension into n pieces, then a region of space will have nXn indices, and the wavefunction is a an nXn matrix To make them in a row, just take all the first row of the matrix, then string the second row after it, then the third row ...

More correctly, a vectors of a vector space are just things that obey some formal rules like http://mathworld.wolfram.com/VectorSpace.html . In their notation X,Y,Z are vectors, but you will see that functions obey those rules just as well, and so are vectors by that definition. The one thing to note is that a scalar product is not part of the vector space definition, and is considered an additional structure. For functions, the scalar product is the overlap integral of the two functions (for complex functions, there's complex conjugation somewhere too, but the basic idea is the same).
 
  • #3
Oh yes, the more correct thing I said above is actually still cheating. If you hunt around these forums, you can see what George Jones says about rigged Hilbert spaces or something very very correct.
 
  • #4
Thanks atyy. I forgot that there was a more general definition of vectors and vector spaces of which the familiar [itex] R^n [/itex] Euclidean kind was only one class. (And I took two linear algebra classes in college! Of course that was a some time ago..)

atyy said:
...functions obey those rules just as well, and so are vectors by that definition.

Wow, that's neat!
 

FAQ: How Can a Single Vector Represent Multi-Dimensional Quantum Information?

What is the first postulate?

The first postulate, also known as the Law of Inertia, states that an object at rest will remain at rest and an object in motion will continue in motion at a constant velocity unless acted upon by an external force.

Who proposed the first postulate?

The first postulate was proposed by Sir Isaac Newton in his famous work, the Principia Mathematica.

How does the first postulate relate to Newton's laws of motion?

The first postulate is the foundation of Newton's laws of motion. It states that objects will maintain their state of motion unless acted upon by a force, which is the basis for the other two laws.

What evidence supports the first postulate?

The first postulate has been supported by numerous experiments and observations, including Galileo's famous experiment with rolling balls on an inclined plane and Newton's own experiments with pendulums and falling objects.

Are there any exceptions to the first postulate?

In some extreme cases, such as in the presence of strong forces like gravity or electromagnetic fields, the first postulate may not hold true. However, in most everyday situations, it is a very accurate description of the behavior of objects in motion.

Similar threads

Replies
61
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top