How can I be sure I'm applying to a school I can get into?

In summary, the conversation discusses the individual's previous experience with applying to graduate schools for biochemistry, biophysics, or microbiology and their struggles in getting accepted. The conversation also includes advice on how to increase chances of acceptance, such as contacting professors and current graduate students, as well as having a professor advocate for them. The conversation also brings up the point that biophysics and microbiology are different fields and the individual may need to make a decision on which field to focus on. Finally, the individual mentions their background in biochemistry and electives in math, physics, and chemistry.
  • #36
analogdesign said:
How do you think you're going to get into a PhD program if you have a 3.2 GPA? Engineering is most likely an easier path to repaying student loans but it's hard work. If you're not that into it you may become a mediocre engineer and then nobody wins.
My GPA is only 3.0 am I doomed for getting into grad school?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
Delong said:
My GPA is only 3.0 am I doomed for getting into grad school?

If you are content with a 3.0 for the rest of your undergrad, you are doomed for a life of mediocrity.

You have to want it. A 3.0 GPA for one year does not need to turn into a 3.0 GPA at graduation.
 
  • #38
Dr. Courtney said:
If you are content with a 3.0 for the rest of your undergrad, you are doomed for a life of mediocrity.

You have to want it. A 3.0 GPA for one year does not need to turn into a 3.0 GPA at graduation.

You don't understand that is my cumulative GPA I am no longer an undergrad I already graduated from college. I took a LOT of hard classes.
 
  • #39
Delong, a 3.0 is very low. Very few schools are likely to accept this.

In grad school, a C is considered failing. A 3.0 average is therefore right on the edge of failing. If you're on the edge for undergrad, it is not promising for grad work.
 
  • #40
Vanadium 50 said:
Delong, a 3.0 is very low. Very few schools are likely to accept this.

In grad school, a C is considered failing. A 3.0 average is therefore right on the edge of failing. If you're on the edge for undergrad, it is not promising for grad work.
But I know I'm a good student and I know I'm intellectually capable. I took a lot of hard classes from different apartments. I was trying to do molecular biology and biochemistry while at the same quarter doing quantum mechanics or differential equations. I took so many tough classes throughout all six years of college I feel like my low GPA is more understandable that way.

I took way more classes than I needed for my major just for my own scientific interests.

Should I retake some classes in college then?
 
Last edited:
  • #41
Delong said:
But I know I'm a good student and I know I'm intellectually capable.

But how will grad schools know this?

I took a lot of hard classes from different apartments. I was trying to do molecular biology and biochemistry while at the same quarter doing quantum mechanics or differential equations. I took so many tough classes throughout all six years of college I feel like my low GPA is more understandable that way.

This shows poor planning skills and a tendency to overestimate your abilities. Still not a good sign for grad school. Don't try to convince us, try to convince the grad school
 
  • #42
Are American grades inflated somehow or the exams are too easy? I read somewhere that in UK first class honors is 70%. My current Uni in Germany would give me the best grade (1.0) if I could get above 95% (no other way) and I just know a guy who could get 1.0 in most of the subjects (very rare).
Maybe most of the PF members are bright (which is quite likely), so 3.2 GPA is not good enough.
 
  • #43
microMRI said:
Are American grades inflated somehow or the exams are too easy? I read somewhere that in UK first class honors is 70%. My current Uni in Germany would give me the best grade (1.0) if I could get above 95% (no other way) and I just know a guy who could get 1.0 in most of the subjects (very rare).
Maybe most of the PF members are bright (which is quite likely), so 3.2 GPA is not good enough.

Yes, the grading system in the US is quite different from Europe. A 90% would be seen extremely good in my country in Europe, and it's usually just one or two students who pull this off. In the US, this seems very different. Also remember that the US use letter grades. The European culture and the US culture are very different.
 
  • #44
microMRI said:
Are American grades inflated somehow or the exams are too easy? I read somewhere that in UK first class honors is 70%. My current Uni in Germany would give me the best grade (1.0) if I could get above 95% (no other way) and I just know a guy who could get 1.0 in most of the subjects (very rare).
Maybe most of the PF members are bright (which is quite likely), so 3.2 GPA is not good enough.

Well, which is easier, to get 90% consistently or 70% consistently?

Anyway, it is not true that the A grade in the US is uniformly 90%. I've taken classes where the A grade is around 80% (and have heard, but not verified that there are classes where it was around 30-40% - apparently a quantum mechanics course at MIT where the brand new professor over estimated what was "easy"). I personally think 90% for an A is very hard, so I've avoided those, but had to do it once - it was a European exam (language exam administered by the Goethe Institut)! So I think your view is too generalized.
 
Last edited:
  • #45
atyy said:
Well, which is easier, to get 90% consistent or 70% consistently?

It depends how the curve is and how tough the exams are.
 
  • Like
Likes atyy
  • #46
micromass said:
But how will grad schools know this?
This shows poor planning skills and a tendency to overestimate your abilities. Still not a good sign for grad school. Don't try to convince us, try to convince the grad school
I was interested in a lot of different subjects. I know it's not a good habit for the long run in science but I was/am young and I couldn't decide on what subjects to focus on. I know I'm supposed to convince the graduate school I just feel like giving a public explanation right now. I know I'm not the most impressive student out there but all I've ever wanted to do in life was become a scientist I thoroughly love science and there's nothing I'd rather do with my life. I've made a lot of personal sacrifices for this very path I can't settle with any other career choice I just can't...
 
  • #47
A 3.0 and taking six years to graduate is even worse, I'm afraid.
 
  • #48
Vanadium 50 said:
A 3.0 and taking six years to graduate is even worse, I'm afraid.
I took a lot of different classes, they aren't from all the same subject/major, that's why I took six years... I don't know I can't just give up. there is honestly nothing else I want to do with my life. I just can't accept "give up" as my answer...
 
  • #49
I got accepted into an REU and I hear some REU's are harder to get into than graduate school. Doesn't that mean I'm capable of getting into graduate school as well? I know I'm not dumb I am a capable student everyone's answers here are really making me feel unstable and touchy...
 
  • #50
Delong said:
I got accepted into an REU and I hear some REU's are harder to get into than graduate school. Doesn't that mean I'm capable of getting into graduate school as well? I know I'm not dumb I am a capable student everyone's answers here are really making me feel unstable and touchy...

Some REU's are harder to get into than graduate school. Not all. You know yourself better than we do, we only know the information that you have given us. Look, don't give up, but take the advice that people have given you -- narrow your focus, be realistic about what schools you can get into, make sure you have good letters of recommendation, talk to potential supervisors. Don't "give up", just be realistic, and do what you can to improve your chances.
 
  • Like
Likes Delong and micromass
  • #51
Delong said:
I can't just give up. there is honestly nothing else I want to do with my life.

Then you should seek counseling. If there is only one thing that will make you happy, this is not healthy. When it is something that you have historically not done terribly well at, this is even less healthy.
 
  • #52
Delong said:
t all I've ever wanted to do in life was become a scientist

And yet you played chess instead of doing your assignments. Is it not reasonable to reserve these positions for those who have worked for them instead of those who played games instead?
 
  • #53
Vanadium 50 said:
And yet you played chess instead of doing your assignments. Is it not reasonable to reserve these positions for those who have worked for them instead of those who played games instead?
How in the world did you know I play chess?!
 
  • #54
e.bar.goum said:
Some REU's are harder to get into than graduate school. Not all. You know yourself better than we do, we only know the information that you have given us. Look, don't give up, but take the advice that people have given you -- narrow your focus, be realistic about what schools you can get into, make sure you have good letters of recommendation, talk to potential supervisors. Don't "give up", just be realistic, and do what you can to improve your chances.
Thanks I really appreciate this advice.
 
  • #55
Delong said:
How in the world did you know I play chess?!

Vanadium is all-knowing and all-seeing.
 
  • #56
Delong said:
How in the world did you know I play chess?!

The chess isn't the point. The point is that you didn't do the work you needed to do.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
788
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
970
Back
Top