How can I factor a quartic equation without a calculator for the AIME?

  • Thread starter p53ud0 dr34m5
  • Start date
In summary, the aime discussed how to factor a number without a calculator. The coefficients 1, -4, 6, -4, look familiar? (think pascals triangle). The method will give all roots, including imaginary and real roots. Next, use the formula for complex roots. You know:\sqrt[4]{1}=+1,-1,+i,-i.
  • #1
p53ud0 dr34m5
94
0
this was on the aime, and i was wondering how to factor it without a calculator.

[tex]x^4-4x^3+6x^2-4x=2005[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Do the coefficients 1, -4, 6, -4, look familiar? (think pascals triangle)
 
  • #3
will this method yield both imaginary and real roots? I am not following your hint.
 
  • #4
It will give all roots. Furthur hint:

[tex]x^4-4x^3+6x^2-4x+1=(x-1)^4[/tex]
 
  • #5
ok, so:
i can add one to each side and have:
[tex]x^4-4x^3+6x^2-4x+1=2006[/tex]
now, i can use the [itex](x-1)^4[/itex]
[tex](x-1)^4=2006[/tex]?
 
  • #6
p53ud0 dr34m5 said:
ok, so:
i can add one to each side and have:
[tex]x^4-4x^3+6x^2-4x+1=2006[/tex]
now, i can use the [itex](x-1)^4[/itex]
[tex](x-1)^4=2006[/tex]?

Yes. Next, use the formula for complex roots. You know:

[tex]\sqrt[4]{1}=+1,-1,+i,-i[/tex]

So:

[tex]\sqrt[4]{2006}[/tex]

is?
 
  • #7
thanks for your help. i have some more questions about other concepts, but ill post a new thread. I am drained from getting up early for the sat. good thing it was easy.
 
  • #8
oh and how do you find the 4th root of a number without your calculator?
 
  • #9
Well, you can get as close as you like to the positive real root by using Newton's Method:

We want the positive, real root of [tex]f(x)=x^4 - 2006[/tex]. Since [tex]6^4 = 1296 < 2006 < 2401 = 7^4[/tex] we make a first guess that the root is [tex]x_1 = \frac{13}{2} = 6.5[/tex]. Newton's method tells us that a better guess is

[tex] x_2 = x_1 - {f(x_1) \over f^\prime (x_1)} = \frac{13}{2} - \frac{\left(\frac{13}{2}\right)^4- 2006}{4\cdot \left(\frac{13}{2}\right)^3} =\frac{13}{2} - \frac{\frac{28561}{16} - \frac{32096}{16}}{\frac{8788}{8}} = \frac{13}{2} + \frac{3535}{17576} = \frac{114244}{17576} + \frac{3535}{17576} = \frac{117779}{17576} \approx 6.701[/tex]

By iterating the method (using 6.701 as a second guess, and applying the same process) you can get arbitrarily close, since our function is continuous and the method does converge for this function. The root is really 6.6924129...
 
Last edited:
  • #10
specifically the question was this...
Let P be the product of the nonreal roots of x^4-4x^3+6x^2-4x=2005. Find the greatest integer that is less than or equal to P.

(1+fourthroot of 2006)(1-fourthroot of 2006)P= -2005
when you factor, you'll see that all roots have to multiply to give -2005

((2006^0.5)-1)P=2005

rationalizing the denominator, 2005(sqrt(2006)+1)/2005
sqrt(2006) is between 44 and 45. thus adding one will yield 45.(something). the greatest integer less than this is 45.
 
  • #11
i personally like the solution to number 8,

2^(333x-2)+2^(111x+2)=2^(222x)+1
has three real roots
find the sum of the roots.

let 2^(111x)=r

then r^3+16r-8r-4=0
let a,b,c be the roots of the polynomial.

then 2^(111x)=a x= Ina/(111In2)

then 2^(111x)=b x=Inb/(111In2)

then 2^(111x)=c x=Inc/(111In2)

adding them and letting (Ina+Inb+Inc)/(111In2)=Inabc/(111In2)

by the third degree polynomial we know that the roots multiply to give 4.

thus (2In2)/(111In2)= 2/111 which is the sum of the roots. m/n, m+n=113
 
  • #12
see, i could get the answer to the one about the imaginaries with a calculator, but i couldn't without one. i suck without a calculator. :smile: the other problem you showed was really easy. i got that one right for sure, because i got 113, but i went about a different way to get the 2/111. i feel really really really stupid that i didnt think of Newtons method to find the root. *sigh*
 
  • #13
there was no need for Newton's method, that's why they say the greatest integer that is less than P. Though it did require to know that the sqrt(2006) is between 44 and 45.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
i was surprised of the easiness of 1-12. 13,14, and 15 are killer problems though.
 
  • #15
heh, i was off by 3 on 15. it sucked. I am not that good at math that requires so much thinking, because this is my first year actually doing any math competition. i was surprised that i even made above a 100 on the amc 12, haha. i think on 13 you have to use factorials, and i have no idea about 14. unfortunately, i thought a lot of th eproblems were hard. i only got 3 on the AIME right. :redface: i could have gotten at least a 6, but i can not add without a calculator. :smile: and i was off by no more than 5 on three that i missed. oh, well. tongos, if i have a question about a problem, could i ask you. do you have aim?
 

FAQ: How can I factor a quartic equation without a calculator for the AIME?

What is a quartic equation?

A quartic equation, also known as a fourth-degree equation, is a polynomial equation of the form ax^4 + bx^3 + cx^2 + dx + e = 0, where a, b, c, d, and e are constants and x is the variable.

How do you solve a quartic equation?

To solve a quartic equation, you can use the quartic formula, which is a complex formula involving the coefficients of the equation. Alternatively, you can use numerical methods such as graphing or iterative methods to approximate the solutions.

What are the possible number of solutions for a quartic equation?

A quartic equation can have up to 4 complex solutions, but it can also have less depending on the values of the coefficients. It is possible for a quartic equation to have 0, 2, or 4 real solutions.

Can a quartic equation have repeated solutions?

Yes, a quartic equation can have repeated solutions. This means that one or more solutions appear more than once in the equation. For example, a quartic equation with the solutions x = 2, x = 2, x = 4, x = 6 has two repeated solutions, x = 2.

What are the real-life applications of quartic equations?

Quartic equations are commonly used in physics, engineering, and other sciences to describe the motion of objects, such as projectiles, under the influence of forces. They are also used in economics to model demand and supply curves, and in chemistry to determine the equilibrium concentrations of reactants and products in a chemical reaction.

Back
Top