How can I properly constrain a 3D truss beam in ANSYS using only beam elements?

In summary, AJ Kazakov suggests that you create coupled dof, for translations only, between the lattice member nodes and the chord node (?).
  • #1
AJ Kazakov
5
0
Hello!
I'm trying to model my truss with FEM using only beam elements in ANSYS, but I am experiencing difficulties with the constraints between the members (or coupling of the DOFs).
For instance, I want my truss chords to be continuous and my lattice members to be pinned to them. I couple all of the translational DOFs, but don't know what to do with the rotational ones.
I would appreciate any help with that. :confused:
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
How do you couple all the translational DOF's?
 
  • #3
I set the nodes of the different elements in a single joint to have the same translations e.g. two diagonals and a vertical meet the chord at the same joint, the chord is rigid (continuous), and the end nodes of the diagonals and the vertical have the same translations as the node of the chord at that joint. But what about the rotations? I don't want to overconstrain the lattice members, but make them pinned to the chord.
 
  • #4
AJ Kazakov: Perhaps try this. When you merge chord keypoints, deselect lattice member keypoints. I.e., do not merge lattice member keypoints. Then, create coupled dof, for translations only, between the lattice member nodes and the chord node (?).
 
  • #5
nvn said:
AJ Kazakov: Perhaps try this. When you merge chord keypoints, deselect lattice member keypoints. I.e., do not merge lattice member keypoints. Then, create coupled dof, for translations only, between the lattice member nodes and the chord node (?).

This works with trusses in 2D.
But let's consider this truss in 3D:

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/800x600q90/839/pg60.png

What rotational coupling should I have for my lattice members with the chord?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #6
AJ Kazakov said:
But let's consider this truss in 3D. What rotational coupling should I have for my lattice members with the chord?
None. You should have no rotational coupling (about the x, y, and z axes) of the lattice members with each chord.
 
  • #7
nvn said:
None. You should have no rotational coupling (about the x, y, and z axes) of the lattice members with each chord.

But aren't the lattice members going to rotate about their own axes then? The same goes for the middle chord. How to constrain them against that?
 
  • #8
AJ Kazakov: Good point. I currently am not sure how to do it in Ansys. In other programs, I probably would release the beam element local Ry, Rz dof at end 1, and release Rx, Ry, Rz at end 2, on each lattice member, where, e.g., Rx = element rotational dof about the element local CS x axis. For the middle chord member, you could either torsionally constrain it to ground on one end, or else you could put a light torsional spring (kx = 1 N*mm/rad) to ground on one end.

Does Ansys have a beam element option to release beam element end dofs, perhaps called beam releases, or beam end releases?
 
Last edited:
  • #9
I have found one element in ANSYS - MPC184 (Multipoint Constraint) which can simulate a joint with a local coordinate system. I'll give it a try. :wink:
 

FAQ: How can I properly constrain a 3D truss beam in ANSYS using only beam elements?

What are truss 3D beam constraints?

Truss 3D beam constraints refer to the limitations or conditions that are placed on a 3D truss structure, which is a type of structural framework commonly used in engineering and architecture. These constraints may include restrictions on the length, angle, or load-bearing capacity of the beams within the truss.

Why are truss 3D beam constraints important?

Truss 3D beam constraints are important because they ensure the structural stability and integrity of a truss system. By limiting certain parameters, such as the length or angle of the beams, the truss is able to withstand external forces and maintain its shape, preventing collapse or failure.

How are truss 3D beam constraints determined?

Truss 3D beam constraints are determined through various methods, such as mathematical calculations, computer simulations, and physical testing. Factors such as the type of material used, the desired strength and stability, and the intended use of the truss all play a role in determining the appropriate constraints.

What are some common types of truss 3D beam constraints?

Some common types of truss 3D beam constraints include pinned, fixed, and roller supports. A pinned support allows for rotation but no translation, while a fixed support restricts both rotation and translation. A roller support only restricts translation in one direction.

Can truss 3D beam constraints be changed or adjusted after construction?

In most cases, truss 3D beam constraints cannot be easily changed or adjusted after construction. These constraints are typically determined and implemented during the design and construction process, and altering them afterwards would require significant modifications to the truss structure.

Similar threads

Back
Top