How can I solve the proof for a projectile fired up an incline?

In summary, a projectile is fired up an incline (incline angle φ) with an initial speed vi at an angle θi with respect to the horizontal (θi > φ). The projectile travels a distance d up the incline, where d = 2*vi^2*cosθi*sin(θi-φ) / g*cos(φ)^2.
  • #1
Epiphone
18
0

Homework Statement



A projectile is fired up an incline (incline angle φ) with an initial speed vi at an angle θi with respect to the horizontal (θi > φ). (a.) Show that the projectile travels a distance d up the incline, where

d = 2*vi^2*cosθi*sin(θi-φ) / g*cos(φ)^2



Homework Equations


[tex]v = v_0 + a t[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried 2 different approaches to this proof. The first strategy was to tilt the figure so that the distance d was parallel to the x axis. However, through some research I found that to rotate the problem, you will also need to find the components of gravity and things got hairy from there.

The second approach I took was to write the normal equations for x and y

( x= v_i cos (\theta_i) t, y= v_i sin ( \theta_i) t - 1/2 g t^2 ).

Then I plugged x= d cos (\phi) and y = d sin ( \phi) into the 2 above equations

I ended up with d(cos(phi)) = v_i(cos(θi))t
and d(sin(phi)) = v_i(sin(θi)t - .5gt^2

I was then told to isolate the t value from the first equation, and plug it into the second equation.

However, this resulted in a very complex equation and I was unable to solve it for d, which should have given me the initial equation I was trying to prove.

Am I making any errors, or should I try a different method?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
your second appraoch seems fine. when you isolate t from this equation:

d(cos(phi)) = v_i(cos(θi))t

and substitute it into the second... you should be able to solve for d... a d cancels on both sides of the equation... so it should be simple to solve for d...
 
  • #3
i see what you mean, but i am having trouble manipulating the variables to isolate d. so far i have:

d(sin(phi)) =(visin(θi)vicos(θi))/dcos(phi)-(gvi^2cos^2(θi))/2d^2cos^2(θ))
 
  • #4
Epiphone said:
i see what you mean, but i am having trouble manipulating the variables to isolate d. so far i have:

d(sin(phi)) =(visin(θi)vicos(θi))/dcos(phi)-(gvi^2cos^2(θi))/2d^2cos^2(θ))

how are you getting d in the denominator? t = dcos(phi)/vicos(θi)
 
  • #5
oh wow, you're absolutely right
let me re-try this
 
  • #6
my second attempt definitely did not work. somehow i lost all of my "v"s

I started with:
dsin(phi) = vsin(θ)dcos(phi)/vcos(θ) - .5g((dcos(phi)/vcos(θ))^2

and ended up with:
d = (sin(phi) - tan(θ)cos(phi)) / (-gcos^2(phi))

should i factor out the dcos(phi)/vcos(θ) initially?
 
  • #7
Epiphone said:
my second attempt definitely did not work. somehow i lost all of my "v"s

I started with:
dsin(phi) = vsin(θ)dcos(phi)/vcos(θ) - .5g((dcos(phi)/vcos(θ))^2

the v's cancel in your first term on the right hand side... there's a v^2 in the denominator in the second term on the right hand side.
 
  • #8
ok, I'm pretty sure I've done all the math correctly, but I've gotten stuck again

i've gotten d by itself:

d = [2v^2cos^2(θ)sin(phi)/-gcos^2(phi)] - [2v^2cos^2(θ)sin(θ)cos(phi)/-gcos^2(phi)cos(θ)]

i am unsure how to get this into the original form, or if i made a mistake along the way
 
  • #9
Epiphone said:
ok, I'm pretty sure I've done all the math correctly, but I've gotten stuck again

i've gotten d by itself:

d = [2v^2cos^2(θ)sin(phi)/-gcos^2(phi)] - [2v^2cos^2(θ)sin(θ)cos(phi)/-gcos^2(phi)cos(θ)]

i am unsure how to get this into the original form, or if i made a mistake along the way

use sin(A-B) = sinAcosB - cosAsinB
 
  • #10
it took a lot of reviewing to find all the little errors i made, but i finally got it to work out
thank you very much for all of your help.

im glad you gave me that trig identity, I've honestly never learned any of them. perhaps in precalc last year, but I've never used any.

thanks again
 
  • #11
Hi, I hope it's ok that I am brining this thread back but I am having some problems with this proof.

I started with the same equations he has

[tex]dsin\phi = (vsin \thetadcos \phi )/(vcos \theta ) - (.5gd^2cos^2 \phi )/(v^2cos^2 \theta )[/tex]

and I reduce it to

[tex]d=(2sin \theta cos \phi v^2cos \theta -2sin \phi v^2cos^2 \theta )/(gcos^2 \phi)[/tex]

Which is not what the original poster got. As you can see my terms on the right are reversed and I have a [tex]cos^2 \theta[/tex] in one and he doesn't.

I have gone through the math quite a few times and I can't see an error.

Could anyone think of a possible error that I could be having? I will post my whole work if needed but it is quite long.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
laforge said:
Hi, I hope it's ok that I am brining this thread back but I am having some problems with this proof.

I started with the same equations he has



and I reduce it to



Which is not what the original poster got. As you can see my terms on the right are reversed and I have a [tex]cos^2 \theta[/tex] in one and he doesn't.

I have gone through the math quite a few times and I can't see an error.

Could anyone think of a possible error that I could be having? I will post my whole work if needed but it is quite long.

Looks the same to me, comparing with post #8.
 

FAQ: How can I solve the proof for a projectile fired up an incline?

What is a projectile up incline proof?

A projectile up incline proof is a mathematical and scientific calculation that demonstrates the motion of an object, such as a ball or a bullet, as it travels up an inclined surface.

How is a projectile up incline proof different from a regular projectile motion calculation?

A regular projectile motion calculation only takes into account the effects of gravity on an object as it travels through the air. A projectile up incline proof also incorporates the effects of an inclined surface, such as friction and changes in angle, on the object's motion.

What is the purpose of a projectile up incline proof?

The purpose of a projectile up incline proof is to accurately predict and understand the motion of an object as it travels up an inclined surface. This can be useful in a variety of fields, such as physics, engineering, and sports.

What are the key components of a projectile up incline proof?

The key components of a projectile up incline proof include the initial velocity of the object, the angle of the incline, the coefficient of friction, and the effects of gravity. These factors are used to calculate the object's position, velocity, and acceleration at any given point in its motion.

How is a projectile up incline proof applied in real life?

A projectile up incline proof has many real-life applications, such as predicting the trajectory of a golf ball on a sloped green, determining the optimal angle for a ski jump, or calculating the force needed to launch a rocket up a ramp. It can also be used in safety measures, such as designing guardrails for roads or calculating the maximum angle for a wheelchair ramp.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
13K
Replies
13
Views
624
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
10K
Back
Top