How can I use the Rational Zeros Theorem to factorize cubic functions?

In summary, the conversation revolves around a question on how to factorize a cubic function. The discussion provides different methods and techniques to solve the problem, including using Cardano's formulae and Ruffini's synthetic division method. The conversation also touches on the importance of understanding and practicing the traditional long division method before using shortcuts. Overall, the conversation offers helpful tips and strategies for factoring cubic functions.
  • #1
danago
Gold Member
1,123
4
Hi. I am a bit lost as to how to factorize a cubic function. Would anyone be able to help me out?

Thanks,
Dan.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Depends on its shape. Post the entire problem. In the general case, you'd have to use Cardano's formulae, but I'm sure that it might not be the case.

Daniel.
 
  • #3
Well i havnt been given en exact question, but from what I've been told, the functions that i will have to factorize will be specially made to be simple. Things like:

[tex]y=x^3-x^2-10x-8[/tex]

Thats one of the functions I've been given to practice.
 
  • #4
danago said:
Well i havnt been given en exact question, but from what I've been told, the functions that i will have to factorize will be specially made to be simple. Things like:

[tex]y=x^3-x^2-10x-8[/tex]

Thats one of the functions I've been given to practice.

y has an obvious zero at x = -1, meaning that (x+1) is a factor of y. (Factor Theorem). Use long division to divide y by (x+1) to get a quadratic, which you should know how to factor.
 
  • #5
How do i divide [tex]x^3-x^2-10x-8[/tex] by (x+1)?
 
  • #6
danago said:
How do i divide [tex]x^3-x^2-10x-8[/tex] by (x+1)?

There's a long hand old fashioned way, which I dislike, and a fast shorthand way which I use. Note that the fast way only works for linear factors with the x-coefficient reduced to one.

You can google for the long way. The short way :

Array the coefficients of the expression out in decreasing order. Put zeros where the term is missing. Then draw lines like this and put -1 at the right hand side. That's the zero of the divisor (x + 1 = 0 implies x = -1).

The algorithm for division is simplicity itself. Bring the first number (the x^3 coefficient) down. Multiply by the number on the right hand side (-1) and write that under the second number (x^2 coeff). *ADD* the corresponding top number (coefficient) to the bottom number to get a new number. In traditional long division, you subtract, but here you add. Work from left to right till you're left with a zero under the constant term. You will always get a zero when the divisor is a factor of the orig. expression. If you get a nonzero number at the end, then the divisor is not a factor and the number you ended up with is in fact the remainder from the division.

Code:
x^3             x^2             x          const

1                -1           -10         -8        | -1
                 -1             2          8        |
____________________________________________________|
                                          | 
1                -2            -8          0

x^2              x          const       Rem

The final answer is obtained by just putting those three bottom-most numbers (don't take the zero, which is the remainder) and using them as coefficients in an expression of degree one less than the orig. expression. In this case, the quotient has degree 2, so the answer is (x^2 - 2x - 8)

So (x^3 - x^2 - 10x - 8)/(x+1) = (x^2 - 2x - 8)

This way works a lot faster than the conventional way because you're working only with numbers (easier for the brain than expressions in x) and you're adding (mentally easier than subtraction). But I think before you use this method practise with the traditional long hand method to learn it well. Then use this for routine purposes (though I don't know if your teacher will be OK with it).

BTW, I just found out that this is called Ruffini's synthetic division method. I've been using it for ages, yet never knew it had a special name! :smile:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_division --> I just added this link as a tutorial.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
To dividea polynomial by another polynomial, we use Long division. You can view it here.
----------------
There's another way that you can do it straight in the paper:
Say, you want to divide x3 - x2 - 10x - 8 by (x + 1). We have:
First, look at the coefficient of the highest order term, i.e x3, and x, we have: x3 / x = x2, so we write:
(x3 - x2 - 10x - 8) / (x + 1) = x2
And we multiply x2 by 1 (bolded above) to obtain x2, we have -x2, i.e, there's a -2x2 left right? We continue to divide -2x2 by x, we have -2x. We write
(x3 - x2 - 10x - 8) / (x + 1) = x2 - 2x. Now we again multiply -2x by 1 to get -2x, we have -10x, that means we are left with -8x. We continue to divide -9x by x to obtain -8, multiply -8 by 1 to get -8, and that's done.
So we have:
(x3 - x2 - 10x - 8) / (x + 1) = x2 - 2x - 8
Can you get it? :)
 
Last edited:
  • #8
I only do algebraic long division only when I absolutely have to...(wastes too much paper) :biggrin:
The way I tend to factorise these types of expressions is as follows:

1) write down what I know so far... (x+1)(ax2+bx+c) = x3-x2-10x-8
2) compare co-efficients ie: for c; 1 multiplied by c will give us -8...c = -8
3) plug -8 in...(x+1)(ax2+bx-8) = x3-x2-10x-8
4) now for x... -8x+bx = -10x...b = -2
5) plug -2 in...(x+1)(ax2 -2x-8) = x3-x2-10x-8
6) Now since x(ax2) = x3, a must surely = 1...as a check though...lets look at x2... -2x2 +x2 = -x2 which is what we wanted.

With practice you just throw a and c in straight away and you only need to look for b
 
Last edited:
  • #9
Thanks for all the replies. Helped me alot, especially that link you posted VietDao29.
 
  • #10
Something else that might help is the Rational Zeros Theorem. If you have any polynomial with integer coefficients, anxn+an-1xn-1+...+a1x+a0=0, all the rational zeros will be of the form p/q, where p is a factor of a0, and q is a factor of an. So if p/q is a zero, there is a corresponding factor, (qx-p).

In your example, the candidates for rational zeros are 8/1, 4/1, 2/1, 1/1, -1/1, -2/1, -4/1, and -8/1 (Of course, you can write them as integers instead of fractions). From here, you can use synthetic division (or long division) on the candidate zeros until you find one that leaves you with no remainder.
 

FAQ: How can I use the Rational Zeros Theorem to factorize cubic functions?

What is factorizing cubic functions?

Factorizing cubic functions is the process of breaking down a polynomial expression of the form ax³ + bx² + cx + d into its factors. This allows us to solve the equation by finding the values of x that make the expression equal to zero.

Why is it important to factorize cubic functions?

Factorizing cubic functions is important because it helps us to solve equations and find the roots of the function. It also allows us to simplify the expression and make it easier to work with in further calculations.

What are the methods for factorizing cubic functions?

There are several methods for factorizing cubic functions, such as grouping, the factor theorem, and the rational root theorem. These methods involve identifying common factors, using synthetic division, and trial and error to find the factors of the expression.

Can all cubic functions be factorized?

Yes, all cubic functions can be factorized. However, some functions may have complex or imaginary roots, which may not be apparent when factoring the expression. In these cases, the use of the quadratic formula may be necessary to find the roots.

How can factorizing cubic functions be applied in real life?

Factorizing cubic functions can be applied in various fields of science, such as physics, engineering, and economics. It can help in solving equations and finding the optimal solutions for different problems, such as maximizing profits or minimizing costs. It is also used in computer programming to simplify and optimize algorithms.

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
34K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top