How Can I Write an Operator in the Coupled and Uncoupled Basis?

In summary: They act as a placeholder so that the matrix elements have the correct dimensions for the two particles. The reason for using the uncoupled basis is because it simplifies the calculation. In the coupled basis, you'd need to consider all possible combinations of the spins of the two particles, which can get complicated. In the uncoupled basis, you can just consider the individual spins of the particles and then add them together later. In summary, the total angular momentum and z-component of the total angular momentum operators for a system of two identical particles with spin 1/2 can be written in the uncoupled basis as the sum of the operators acting on each particle. The square of the total angular momentum operator can be rewritten in terms
  • #1
Sunnyocean
72
6
Given a system of two identical particles (let's say electrons), of (max) spin 1/2 (which means the magnetic quantum number of each of the electrons can be either 1/2 or -1/2), how can we write the operators (total angular momentum, z-component of the total angular momentum etc.) (a) in the uncoupled basis and (b) in the uncoupled basis?

Please be specific and give numerical examples.

First, my problem is that I don't know how to write an operator in either the coupled or the uncoupled basis, and I really searched the internet and a few well-known quantum mechanics books (e.g. Griffiths). Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It doesn't matter if your two particles are identical or not, your total operator is the sum of the operators acting on each particle:
$$\vec{L}_{tot}=\vec{L}_1+\vec{L}_2$$

The square of this is:

$$\vec{L}^2_{tot}=\vec{L}^2_1+\vec{L}^2_2+2\vec{L}_1 \cdot \vec{L}_2$$

One way to calculate the matrix elements is to rewrite

$$\vec{L}^2_{tot}=\vec{L}^2_1 I_2+I_1\vec{L}^2_2+2\vec{L}_1 \cdot \vec{L}_2$$

Now consider the first term [itex]\vec{L}^2_1 I_2[/itex]. First write the matrix element acting on the 1st particle:

$$\begin{pmatrix}3\hbar^2/4 & 0 \\
0 &3\hbar^2/4 \end{pmatrix}$$

Them multiply each element of that matrix with the matrix element acting on the 2nd particle:

$$\begin{pmatrix}3\hbar^2/4 \begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 \\ 0&1\end{pmatrix} & 0 \begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 \\ 0&1\end{pmatrix} \\
0\begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 \\ 0&1\end{pmatrix} &3\hbar^2/4\begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 \\ 0&1\end{pmatrix} \end{pmatrix}=
\begin{pmatrix}3\hbar^2/4 & 0 & 0 & 0\\
0 & 3\hbar^2/4 & 0 & 0\\
0 & 0 & 3\hbar^2/4 & 0 \\
0 &0&0& 3\hbar^2/4
\end{pmatrix}
$$

Do this for each of the terms, and add them all up.
 
  • #3
addendum: I didn't read your question carefully. For the total angular momentum operator, you'd write:

$$\vec{J}_{tot}^2=(\vec{L_1}+\vec{S_1}+\vec{L_2}+\vec{S_2})^2$$

Expand it out. Then you'd do the same thing, except you'll have 4 nested matrices instead of 2. The basis would be the uncoupled basis.
 
  • #4
Hi geoduck and thank you very much for taking the time to explain.

Could you explain what ## I_2 ## stands for? (and also what is ## I_1 ## )

Also, I did not understand how you start from 2 X 2 matrices and end up with 4 X 4 matrices, as well as *why* do you need to do this. Could you explain in more detail?
 
  • #5
Also, what is the reason behind using the unitary matrix and not some other matrix in your calculation above?

Again, sorry if this seem like a dumb question but I really need to understand.
 
  • #6
If you only consider spin and you have a single electron, it can be described by |+> or |->. Therefore a matrix operating on these states is 2x2. If you have two electrons, you need to specify the state of the first electron and the state of the second electron, so you need 4 vectors: |++>, |+->, |-+>, and |-->. A matrix operating on these states would then be 4x4. If you include orbital angular momentum of the first and second particles also, you'd have states |l1 m1s1l2 m2 s2>. So your matrices keep on getting larger.

The fact that the electrons are identical can reduce the dimensionality because you only need the action of the operator on antisymmetric states.

I1 and I2 are the identity operators on particle 1, and particle 2, respectively.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person

FAQ: How Can I Write an Operator in the Coupled and Uncoupled Basis?

What is an operator in the coupled and uncoupled basis?

An operator in the coupled and uncoupled basis is a mathematical representation of a physical quantity or observable, such as energy, momentum, or spin, in a quantum system. It describes the relationship between the system's states and the corresponding measurements that can be made.

What is the difference between the coupled and uncoupled basis?

The difference between the coupled and uncoupled basis lies in the way the states of a quantum system are represented. In the coupled basis, the states are expressed as linear combinations of states with different values of a specific quantum number. In the uncoupled basis, the states are expressed as product states of individual states with well-defined values of each quantum number.

How can I write an operator in the coupled basis?

To write an operator in the coupled basis, you must first determine the appropriate quantum numbers and their corresponding states for the system. Then, the operator can be written as a matrix with elements that represent the effect of the operator on each state. The specific form of the operator will depend on the physical quantity it represents.

How can I write an operator in the uncoupled basis?

To write an operator in the uncoupled basis, you must first determine the individual states with well-defined values of each quantum number for the system. Then, the operator can be written as a product of operators that act on each individual state. This form of the operator is useful for systems with a large number of particles or degrees of freedom.

What is the significance of writing an operator in both coupled and uncoupled bases?

Writing an operator in both coupled and uncoupled bases allows for a more complete understanding of the quantum system. In the coupled basis, the operator may reveal underlying symmetries or relationships between the states. In the uncoupled basis, the operator may provide a more intuitive understanding of how the system behaves. Additionally, the two representations can be used to transform between each other and to solve different types of problems in quantum mechanics.

Similar threads

Back
Top