How Can Laplace Transforms Solve an Initial Value Problem?

In summary, the conversation was about using the method of Laplace transform to solve an initial value problem. The steps involve applying the Laplace transform to the equation and using properties to simplify it. Then, finding the inverse Laplace transform to get the solution. The conversation also discussed the formula for Laplace transform of t^n, which is \frac{n!}{s^{n+1}}. The final solution is y(t) = 1 + 3t^2.
  • #1
diffeqnoob
14
0
Okay, I know this is alot... but I am stuck, so here goes...

Use the method of Laplace transform to solve the initial value problem

[tex]y''+3ty'-6y=0, y(0) = 1, y'(0) = 0[/tex]
[tex]L\{y'' + 3ty' - 6y\} = L\{0\}[/tex]
[tex]s^{2}Y(s) - sy(0) - y'(0) + 3L\{ty'\} - 6Y(s) = 0[/tex]
[tex]s^{2}Y(s) - s(1) - 0 - \frac{d}{ds}\left(3 L\{ty'\}\right) -6Y(s) = 0[/tex]

Now to resolve the [tex]- \frac{d}{ds}\left(3 L\{ty'\}\right)[/tex]
[tex]= - \frac{d}{ds}\left(3 L\{ty'\}\right)[/tex]

[tex]= - \frac{d}{ds}3 \left(sY(s) - y(0)\right)[/tex]

[tex]= -3sY'(s) - 3Y(s)[/tex]


Plugging it back into the eq we now have

[tex]s^{2}Y(s) - s - 3sY'(s) - 3Y(s) - 6Y(s) = 0[/tex]

[tex]-3sY'(s) + (s^{2}-9)Y(s) - s = 0[/tex]

[tex]Y'(s) + \left(-\frac{s}{3} + \frac{3}{s}\right)Y(s) = -\frac{1}{3}[/tex]

[tex]\mu = e^{\int\left(-\frac{s}{3} + \frac{3}{s}\right)ds}[/tex]

[tex]\mu = e^{\left(-\frac{s^{2}}{6} + ln(s^{3})\right)[/tex]

[tex]\mu = s^{3} e^{\left(-\frac{s^{2}}{6}\right)[/tex]

[tex]\int\left(\frac{d}{ds}(s^{3}e^{-\left(\frac{s^2}{6}\right)}Y(s)\right) = \int-\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)s^{3}e^{-\left(\frac{s^2}{6}\right)} ds[/tex]

[tex]s^{3}e^{-\left(\frac{s^2}{6}\right)}Y(s) = \int-\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)s^{3}e^{-\left(\frac{s^2}{6}\right)} ds[/tex]


RIGHT SIDE
[tex]=\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)(-3(s^{2}+6)e^{-\left(\frac{s^2}{6}\right)[/tex]

[tex]=(s^2+6)e^{-\left(\frac{s^2}{6}\right) + A[/tex]

[tex]Y(s)=\frac{(s^2+6)}{s^{3}} + \frac{A e^ \frac{s^2{6}{s^{3}}[/tex]

[tex] Limit...as... s \rightarrow \infty...Y(s) = 0...therefore A = 0[/tex]

[tex]Y(s) = \frac{s^2+6}{s^3}[/tex]



Break down the Inverse Laplace
[tex]L^{-1}\{\frac{s^2+6}{s^3}\}[/tex]

[tex]=L^{-1}\{\frac{s^2}{s^3}\} + L^{-1}{\frac{6}{s^3}\}[/tex]

[tex]=L^{-1}\{\frac{1}{s}\} + L^{-1}{\frac{6}{s^3}\}[/tex]

[tex]= 1 + ? [/tex]


This is where I get lost... I don't know how to do the other side... Please help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Why does my tex look all ugly and bad ?
 
  • #3
diffeqnoob said:
[tex]=L^{-1}\{\frac{1}{s}\} + L^{-1}{\frac{6}{s^3}\}[/tex]

[tex]= 1 + ? [/tex]


This is where I get lost... I don't know how to do the other side... Please help.

What other side? I hope it is not calculating the antitransform of
[tex]\frac{6}{s^3}[/tex] because it's pretty easy, it is in any table.

Hint:[tex]L\{t^n\}=\frac{\Gamma(n+1)}{s^{n+1}}[/tex]
 
  • #4
Clausius2 said:
What other side? I hope it is not calculating the antitransform of
[tex]\frac{6}{s^3}[/tex] because it's pretty easy, it is in any table.

Hint:[tex]L\{t^n\}=\frac{\Gamma(n+1)}{s^{n+1}}[/tex]


Yes this is where I was lost because I didn't have that in the table my professor gave me. His said:


[tex]L\{t^n\}=\frac{\Gamma(n!)}{s^{n+1}}[/tex]

I am lost because I only see this problem as:

[tex]L\{t^n\}=\frac{\Gamma(2+1)}{s^{2+1}}[/tex]
[tex]= t^2[/tex]... i know this isn't right.

wait... is this what I think it is? Am I overthinking this. Is the answer:

[tex]2t^2 [/tex] ? A 2 multiplied into the answer would make the numerator a 6. Am I right ?
 
  • #5
can someone verify if [tex]2t^2 [/tex]is right ?
 
  • #6
Clausius2 said:
What other side? I hope it is not calculating the antitransform of
[tex]\frac{6}{s^3}[/tex] because it's pretty easy, it is in any table.

Hint:[tex]L\{t^n\}=\frac{\Gamma(n+1)}{s^{n+1}}[/tex]

I have looked all over the internet and in my book and I cannot find the above mentioned Laplace Transform formula anywhere. Did you mean (n!) in the numerator vice the (n+1) ? In that case, that would make my answer [tex]3t^2[/tex]
 
  • #7
For n a positive integer:

[tex]\Gamma(n+1)=n![/tex]
 
  • #8
I appreciate the help :smile:

thanks. I can't believe I didn't see that the antitransform was so simple...

[tex] y(t) = 1 + 3t^2 [/tex]
 

FAQ: How Can Laplace Transforms Solve an Initial Value Problem?

What is a Laplace Transform and how is it used in IVP?

A Laplace Transform is a mathematical tool used to convert a function in the time domain to a function in the frequency domain. In IVP (Initial Value Problem), it is used to solve differential equations by transforming the equation into an algebraic equation which can then be solved using inverse Laplace Transform.

What are the steps involved in using Laplace Transform for IVP?

The steps involved in using Laplace Transform for IVP are:

  1. Take the Laplace Transform of both sides of the given equation
  2. Use properties of Laplace Transform to simplify the equation
  3. Apply initial conditions to find the constants in the transformed equation
  4. Use inverse Laplace Transform to get the solution in the time domain

Can Laplace Transform be used for all types of initial value problems?

No, Laplace Transform can only be used for linear initial value problems with constant coefficients. Non-linear problems or problems with time-varying coefficients cannot be solved using Laplace Transform.

What are the advantages of using Laplace Transform in solving IVP?

Some advantages of using Laplace Transform in solving IVP are:

  • It can solve linear differential equations with constant coefficients quickly and efficiently
  • The solution is in the time domain, making it easier to interpret and apply to real-life situations
  • It can handle complex initial conditions, such as piecewise functions or impulse functions

Are there any limitations of using Laplace Transform for IVP?

Yes, there are some limitations of using Laplace Transform for IVP, such as:

  • It can only be used for linear problems with constant coefficients
  • The initial conditions must be given for all variables in the equation
  • Inverse Laplace Transform can be challenging to compute for some functions

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
941
Back
Top