- #36
Imax
- 186
- 0
Chalnoth said:Well, a compact Lorentzian manifold has closed timelike curves. That's one reason why our universe isn't one.
I don’t necessarily agree, but I think Aztral already go the answer he/she was looking for. What I was trying to say is that maybe there is no such thing as an empty universe. Trying to calculate properties of such a universe may be a nice exercise in mathematics or “theoretical” physics, but it may have nothing to do with reality. CMB data seems to fit better with a finite model of the universe than with an infinite model, and that seems to make sense to me.
I can see two possibilities at or near the Big Bang:
1) Space-time was infinite and somewhere within that infinite space was a very small volume (a singularity?) that contained the mass/energy of the entire universe.
2) Space-time was so badly curved (i.e. mass can bend space-time in GR) that space-time itself was finite around this volume/singularity.
My $ is on #2. Excluding possible quantum effects, topology does not change with time.