- #1
- 10,338
- 1,516
I've been trying to express the Komar mass formula in component notation for a general static metric.
I'm finding that the expression for
[tex]
\nabla_c \xi_d
[/tex]
is reasonably simple, where [itex]\xi^{\mu}[/itex] is a timelike Killing vector, but the formula calls for
[tex]
\epsilon_{abcd} \nabla^c \xi^d
[/tex]
and this is very messy.
(We have to integrate the above two-form over some surface to get the mass and multiply by an appropriate constant).
Is it kosher to re-write the formula for the Komar mass as
[tex]
-\frac{1}{8 \pi} \int_S \epsilon^{abcd} \nabla_c \xi_d
[/tex]
and to do so, would I be expressing the surface to be integrated by one-forms rather than vectors?
I'm finding that the expression for
[tex]
\nabla_c \xi_d
[/tex]
is reasonably simple, where [itex]\xi^{\mu}[/itex] is a timelike Killing vector, but the formula calls for
[tex]
\epsilon_{abcd} \nabla^c \xi^d
[/tex]
and this is very messy.
(We have to integrate the above two-form over some surface to get the mass and multiply by an appropriate constant).
Is it kosher to re-write the formula for the Komar mass as
[tex]
-\frac{1}{8 \pi} \int_S \epsilon^{abcd} \nabla_c \xi_d
[/tex]
and to do so, would I be expressing the surface to be integrated by one-forms rather than vectors?
Last edited: