How can the sum of this series be proven using induction?

In summary, the conversation discusses how to prove the equation \sum_{j=1}^{2m} \frac{(-1)^{j+1}}{j} = \sum_{j=1}^m \frac{1}{j+m} by using mathematical induction. The individual explains how they were able to manipulate the left side of the equation but struggled with the right side. They eventually figured out that the right side can be written as \sum_{j=1}^k \frac{1}{k+1+j} - \frac{1}{k+1} + \frac{1}{(k+1)+k} which allows for the induction hypothesis to be formed.
  • #1
Parth Dave
299
0
Show that the sum of the series from j = 1 up to 2m of (-1)^(j+1)*(1/j) is equal to the sum of the series from j=1 up to m of (1/(m+j)).

it works for m = 1.
After assuming m = k is true, and plugging in m = k+1 i got

sum of the series from j = 1 up to 2(k+1) of (-1)^(j+1)*(1/j) is equal to the sum of the series from j=1 up to k+1 of (1/(k+j+1)).

Now the big problem I am having is with the right side. The left side is ok, i realize that it can be written as the left side of the induction hypothesis plus the next two terms. Whats really bugging me tho is the right side. I can't see any way to form the induction hypothesis out of it. This is really because of the m+j in the series.

Because if i want to write the sum of the series from j=1 up to k+1 of (1/(k+j+1)), but with the upper limit as k, i would write it as:

the sum of the series from j=1 up to k of (1/(k+j+1)) + 1/2(k+1) (since j = k+1)

is that correct? And if it is i can't generate the induction left hand side. Meaning i can't get rid of the summation. Am i on the right track? where did i make a mistake? Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think I managed to do it. I assume what you're trying to prove is the following:
[tex]\sum_{j=1}^{2m} \frac{(-1)^{j+1}}{j} = \sum_{j=1}^m \frac{1}{j+m}[/tex]

When you substitute m=k+1, sooner or later you would get [tex]\sum_{j=1}^k \frac{1}{k+j}[/tex]on the LHS.

Here's a hint: [tex]\sum_{j=1}^k \frac{1}{k+j} = (\sum_{j=1}^k \frac{1}{k+1+j})\ - \ \frac{1}{k+1} \ + \ \frac{1}{(k+1)+k}[/tex]

LaTex sure took a long time to create.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3



To prove this statement by induction, we will first show that it is true for m=1.
For m=1, the left side of the equation becomes (-1)^2*(1/1) = 1 and the right side becomes 1/(1+1) = 1/2. So, the statement is true for m=1.

Next, we will assume that the statement is true for m=k, meaning that the sum of the series from j=1 up to 2k of (-1)^(j+1)*(1/j) is equal to the sum of the series from j=1 up to k of (1/(k+j)).
Now, we want to show that the statement is also true for m=k+1.

We can rewrite the left side of the equation as the sum of the series from j=1 up to 2k of (-1)^(j+1)*(1/j) + (-1)^(2k+2)*(1/(2k+1)) + (-1)^(2k+3)*(1/(2k+2)).
We can see that this is just the left side of the induction hypothesis plus the next two terms.

Now, we can rewrite the right side of the equation as the sum of the series from j=1 up to k of (1/(k+j)) + 1/(k+1) (since j=k+1).
We can see that this is just the right side of the induction hypothesis plus the term 1/(k+1).

Thus, we have shown that the statement is true for m=k+1.
By the principle of mathematical induction, the statement is true for all positive integers m.

In summary, we have shown that the sum of the series from j=1 up to 2m of (-1)^(j+1)*(1/j) is equal to the sum of the series from j=1 up to m of (1/(m+j)) for all positive integers m.
 

FAQ: How can the sum of this series be proven using induction?

What is "Another Proof by Induction"?

"Another Proof by Induction" is a mathematical proof technique used to prove statements about a set of numbers or other mathematical objects. It involves proving that a statement is true for a base case, and then showing that if the statement is true for a particular number, it is also true for the next number in the sequence.

When is "Another Proof by Induction" used?

"Another Proof by Induction" is commonly used in mathematics, particularly in algebra and number theory, to prove statements about sequences, series, and other mathematical objects. It can also be used in computer science and other fields to prove the correctness of algorithms and programs.

How is "Another Proof by Induction" different from regular induction?

"Another Proof by Induction" is a variant of regular induction where instead of starting with the base case and then proving that the statement holds for the next number, it starts with the statement being true for a particular number and then proves that it holds for the previous number. This can be useful when the statement is easier to prove for larger numbers.

What are the steps involved in "Another Proof by Induction"?

The steps involved in "Another Proof by Induction" are similar to regular induction. First, you must prove the statement is true for a base case. Then, you assume the statement is true for a particular number and use this assumption to prove that it is also true for the previous number. Finally, you conclude that if the statement holds for the previous number, it must also hold for the next number, completing the proof.

What are some common mistakes to avoid when using "Another Proof by Induction"?

One common mistake when using "Another Proof by Induction" is assuming that the statement is true for all numbers without proving it for the base case. It's also important to make sure that the statement is actually true for the previous number, as this is a crucial step in the proof. Another mistake is assuming that the statement is true for the previous number just because it is true for the next number. Careful reasoning and thorough proof writing are essential in avoiding these mistakes.

Similar threads

Back
Top