How can we predict the geometry of a coordination compound?

  • Thread starter cncbmb
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Geometry
In summary, the chemistry teacher told me to look up coordinate chemistry in a textbook, but the textbook did not have the answer.
  • #1
cncbmb
16
0
This isn't a homework question, and I've always wondered about this. My chemistry teacher told me to look up "coordinate chemistry" in a textbook, but the textbook did not have the answer.

How can we predict the geometry of a coordination compound?

I googled my question first, and I found that Lewis and VSEPR don't work for transition metal coordination compounds: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080405102937AAOh7Gd
"If your teacher thinks you can rationalize that using a Lewis structure and VSEPR principles, I'd like to see it. Pt2+ is 8 electrons, NH3 and Cl- each donate two to the bonds, that gives you 16e total around the Pt, 8 involved in bond pairs. So, that's what, AX4E4? You certainly can't use that to predict square planar, which is the observed structure. Neither can you explain why [PtCl4]2- is square planar but [NiCl4]2- is tetrahedral, even though they have the same number of valence electrons and (presumably) the same Lewis structure. Lewis and VSEPR don't work for TM compounds."

I guess does that mean we can somehow predict the geometries of non-transition metal coordination complexes?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
  • #2
I am not sure if we do have a universal theory that can be used to predict structure of every coordination compound.
 
  • #3
Sure we do, Borek - (relativistic) quantum theory. Every other model is just an approximation of that, anyway.

Which is the problem, really. Any simple model is at best an approximation, but the effects that govern transition-metal coordination (primarily the relative energy and splitting of d-orbital energy levels) are relatively small. Which doesn't mean that they're unpredictable. Just that you need a pretty exact model to do it. In the case of platinum and other heavy metals, you also have to take into account relativistic effects and the f-orbitals.
 
  • #4
alxm said:
Sure we do, Borek - (relativistic) quantum theory.

Honestly - I was going to write something like that, but decided against :-p
 

FAQ: How can we predict the geometry of a coordination compound?

1. What factors determine the geometry of a coordination compound?

The geometry of a coordination compound is determined by the number of ligands attached to the central metal ion, the size of the ligands, and the charge of the central metal ion.

2. How does the coordination number affect the geometry of a coordination compound?

The coordination number, or the number of ligands attached to the central metal ion, determines the overall shape of the compound. For example, a coordination number of 2 will result in a linear geometry, while a coordination number of 4 will result in a tetrahedral geometry.

3. Can we predict the geometry of a coordination compound using theoretical models?

Yes, there are various theoretical models and computational methods that can be used to predict the geometry of a coordination compound. These include the VSEPR theory, crystal field theory, and molecular orbital theory.

4. How does the electronic structure of a coordination compound affect its geometry?

The electronic structure of a coordination compound, specifically the arrangement of electrons in the d-orbitals of the central metal ion, can influence its geometry. This is because the repulsion between the electrons in the d-orbitals can affect the bond angles and overall shape of the compound.

5. Are there any experimental techniques that can be used to determine the geometry of a coordination compound?

Yes, techniques such as X-ray crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy can be used to determine the geometry of a coordination compound. These techniques provide information on the arrangement of atoms and bonds in a compound, which can help in determining its geometry.

Back
Top