How Can We Prove Basic Properties of Set Theory?

  • MHB
  • Thread starter evinda
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Sets
In summary, we discussed the concept of subset and how it applies to the given sentences. We also explored the proof by contradiction to show that $\varnothing=\{ x: x \neq x \}$.
  • #1
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
3,836
0
Hello! (Wave)

I want to prove the following sentences:

  1. $A \subset B \wedge B \subset C \rightarrow A \subset C$
  2. $A \subset B \wedge B \subset A \rightarrow A=B$
  3. $\varnothing \subset A$
  4. $\varnothing=\{ x: x \neq x \}$

That's what I have tried:

  1. $A \subset B \leftrightarrow \forall x(x \in A \rightarrow x \in B)$
    $B \subset C \leftrightarrow \forall x(x \in B \rightarrow x \in C)$

    $A \subset B \wedge B \subset C \leftrightarrow \forall x(x \in A \rightarrow x \in B \rightarrow x \in C) \leftrightarrow \forall x(x \in A \rightarrow x \in C) \leftrightarrow A \subset C$
    $$$$
  2. $A \subset B \leftrightarrow \forall x(x \in A \rightarrow x \in B)$
    $B \subset A \leftrightarrow \forall x(x \in B \rightarrow x \in A)$
    $A \subset B \wedge B \subset A \leftrightarrow \forall x(x \in A \leftrightarrow x \in B)$
    $$$$
  3. In my notes, there is the following proof for this sentence:

    Let $x$ an element that does not belong to $A$. Then, since $\varnothing$ does not contain any element, $x$ does not belong to $\varnothing$.

    Why do we conclude that $C \subset D$, showing that if $x \notin D \rightarrow x \notin C$ ?
    $$$$
  4. How can we prove that $\varnothing=\{ x: x \neq x \}$ ? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
To prove that $\varnothing=\{ x: x \neq x \}$, we can use the proof by contradiction. Assume that $\varnothing \neq \{ x: x \neq x \}$. Then, there must be an element $x$ such that $x \in \varnothing$ and $x \in \{ x: x \neq x \}$. This is a contradiction since $x \neq x$. Thus, we can conclude that $\varnothing = \{ x: x \neq x \}$.
 

FAQ: How Can We Prove Basic Properties of Set Theory?

What is the purpose of proving sentences about sets?

The purpose of proving sentences about sets is to determine the truth or falsehood of a statement about a set. This helps to establish the validity of mathematical arguments and ensures that mathematical statements are logically sound.

How do you prove a sentence about a set?

To prove a sentence about a set, you must use logical reasoning and mathematical principles to show that the statement is true. This may involve using definitions, axioms, theorems, and other mathematical tools to build a logical argument.

What are some common techniques used in proving sentences about sets?

Some common techniques used in proving sentences about sets include direct proof, proof by contradiction, and proof by induction. These techniques involve using logical reasoning and mathematical principles to establish the validity of a statement.

Can you provide an example of a sentence about a set that needs to be proven?

One example of a sentence about a set that needs to be proven is the statement "The set of prime numbers is infinite." This statement can be proven using a direct proof by showing that for any finite set of prime numbers, there exists a prime number that is larger, thus proving that the set is infinite.

Are there any limitations to proving sentences about sets?

Yes, there are some limitations to proving sentences about sets. One limitation is that not all statements about sets can be proven. Some statements, such as the Continuum Hypothesis, are undecidable and cannot be proven to be true or false. Additionally, proving sentences about sets requires a solid understanding of mathematical concepts and principles, so it may not be accessible to everyone.

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top