How can we solve a radical equation without using a calculator?

  • MHB
  • Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Radical
In summary, we can show that the equation $2\pm\sqrt{5}=\left(\frac{1\pm\sqrt{5}}{2}\right)^3$ is true by using the theory of Quadratic Integers and the norm function. This allows us to solve for the values of $a$ and $b$ in the equation, which results in the solution of $\sqrt[3]{2\pm\sqrt{5}}=\frac{1}{2}\pm\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{5}$. However, the process of taking the cube root is tedious and involves solving equations, so the use of Quadratic Integers can make it slightly easier.
  • #1
mathdad
1,283
1
Show that the RHS = LHS without using a calculator.

View attachment 7807
 

Attachments

  • MathMagic180217_2.png
    MathMagic180217_2.png
    1.9 KB · Views: 78
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I would observe that:

\(\displaystyle \left(1\pm\sqrt{5}\right)^3=1\pm3\sqrt{5}+3\cdot5\pm5\sqrt{5}=16\pm8\sqrt{5}=8\left(2\pm\sqrt{5}\right)\)

Hence:

\(\displaystyle 2\pm\sqrt{5}=\left(\frac{1\pm\sqrt{5}}{2}\right)^3\)
 
  • #3
MarkFL said:
I would observe that:

\(\displaystyle \left(1\pm\sqrt{5}\right)^3=1\pm3\sqrt{5}+3\cdot5\pm5\sqrt{5}=16\pm8\sqrt{5}=8\left(2\pm\sqrt{5}\right)\)

Hence:

\(\displaystyle 2\pm\sqrt{5}=\left(\frac{1\pm\sqrt{5}}{2}\right)^3\)

What would the algebra look like if I take the cube root on both sides? Is it tedious?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
That's not necessary. Put $\left(\frac{1\pm\sqrt5}{2}\right)^3$ instead of $2\pm\sqrt5$ in $\sqrt[3]{2+\sqrt5}+\sqrt[3]{2-\sqrt5}=1$. What do you get?

If you mean taking the cube root of both sides of $2\pm\sqrt{5}=\left(\frac{1\pm\sqrt{5}}{2}\right)^3$, you'd arrive at the solution.
 
  • #5
RTCNTC said:
What would the algebra look like if I take the cube root on both sides? Is it tedious?

Let's assume that the cube root is in the same Ring of Quadratic Integers.
That is, we can write the cube root $\sqrt[3]{2\pm \sqrt 5}$ as $a+b\sqrt 5$.

Then to take the cube root, we can solve a and b from:
$$(a+b\sqrt 5)^3 = 2 \pm \sqrt 5$$
We have:
$$(a+b\cdot\sqrt 5)^3 = a^3+3a^2b\cdot\sqrt 5 + 3ab^2\cdot 5 + b^2\cdot 5\sqrt 5 = a(a^2+15b^2) + b(3a^2 + 5b^2)\sqrt 5$$
So:
$$\begin{cases}a(a^2+15b^2) = 2 \\ b(3a^2 + 5b^2) = \pm 1
\end{cases} \tag 1$$
Unfortunately this is quite tedious to solve. (Worried)

Luckily we can draw on the theory of Quadratic Integers to make it a bit easier.
That's by using the norm $N$, which is defined as $N(x+y\sqrt 5)=x^2-5y^2$.
The norm $N(a+b\sqrt 5)$, when raised to the power of 3, must then be equal to $N(2\pm \sqrt 5)$.
Thus, we get the additional identity:
$$N(a+b\sqrt 5)^3 = N(2\pm \sqrt 5) \quad\Rightarrow\quad (a^2 - 5b^2)^3 = 2^2 - 5(\pm 1)^2 = -1$$
This implies:
$$a^2-5b^2 = -1 \quad\Rightarrow\quad 5b^2 = a^2+1 \tag 2$$
Substituting in (1) yields:
$$a(a^2+3\cdot 5b^2)= a(a^2+3(a^2+1))=4a^3+3a=2 \quad\Rightarrow\quad 4a^3+3a-2=0$$

Next, from the Rational Root Theorem we know that any rational root must be one of:
$$\pm 2, \pm 1, \pm\frac 12, \pm\frac 14$$
And indeed, $a=\frac 12$ fits.
Substituting back into (2) yields:
$$5b^2 = \Big(\frac 12\Big)^2+1 = \frac 54 \quad\Rightarrow\quad b=\pm\frac 12$$

So we find that:
$$\sqrt[3]{2\pm \sqrt 5} = \frac 12 \pm \frac 12 \sqrt 5 \tag 3$$TL;DR: Yep, it's tedious to take the cube root. (Angel)
 
  • #6
I like Serena said:
Let's assume that the cube root is in the same Ring of Quadratic Integers.
That is, we can write the cube root $\sqrt[3]{2\pm \sqrt 5}$ as $a+b\sqrt 5$.

Then to take the cube root, we can solve a and b from:
$$(a+b\sqrt 5)^3 = 2 \pm \sqrt 5$$
We have:
$$(a+b\cdot\sqrt 5)^3 = a^3+3a^2b\cdot\sqrt 5 + 3ab^2\cdot 5 + b^2\cdot 5\sqrt 5 = a(a^2+15b^2) + b(3a^2 + 5b^2)\sqrt 5$$
So:
$$\begin{cases}a(a^2+15b^2) = 2 \\ b(3a^2 + 5b^2) = \pm 1
\end{cases} \tag 1$$
Unfortunately this is quite tedious to solve. (Worried)

Luckily we can draw on the theory of Quadratic Integers to make it a bit easier.
That's by using the norm $N$, which is defined as $N(x+y\sqrt 5)=x^2-5y^2$.
The norm $N(a+b\sqrt 5)$, when raised to the power of 3, must then be equal to $N(2\pm \sqrt 5)$.
Thus, we get the additional identity:
$$N(a+b\sqrt 5)^3 = N(2\pm \sqrt 5) \quad\Rightarrow\quad (a^2 - 5b^2)^3 = 2^2 - 5(\pm 1)^2 = -1$$
This implies:
$$a^2-5b^2 = -1 \quad\Rightarrow\quad 5b^2 = a^2+1 \tag 2$$
Substituting in (1) yields:
$$a(a^2+3\cdot 5b^2)= a(a^2+3(a^2+1))=4a^3+3a=2 \quad\Rightarrow\quad 4a^3+3a-2=0$$

Next, from the Rational Root Theorem we know that any rational root must be one of:
$$\pm 2, \pm 1, \pm\frac 12, \pm\frac 14$$
And indeed, $a=\frac 12$ fits.
Substituting back into (2) yields:
$$5b^2 = \Big(\frac 12\Big)^2+1 = \frac 54 \quad\Rightarrow\quad b=\pm\frac 12$$

So we find that:
$$\sqrt[3]{2\pm \sqrt 5} = \frac 12 \pm \frac 12 \sqrt 5 \tag 3$$TL;DR: Yep, it's tedious to take the cube root. (Angel)

Wonderfully informative reply. Thanks.
 

FAQ: How can we solve a radical equation without using a calculator?

What is a radical equation 2?

A radical equation 2 is an equation that contains a radical expression, such as a square root, cube root, or other root, on one or both sides of the equals sign.

What is the difference between a radical equation 1 and a radical equation 2?

The main difference between a radical equation 1 and a radical equation 2 is the number of radical expressions present in the equation. A radical equation 1 has only one radical expression, while a radical equation 2 has two or more.

How do you solve a radical equation 2?

To solve a radical equation 2, you must isolate the radical expression on one side of the equation and then square both sides to eliminate the radical. This process may need to be repeated if there are multiple radical expressions in the equation.

Can a radical equation 2 have more than two radical expressions?

Yes, a radical equation 2 can have any number of radical expressions on either side of the equation. However, the process of solving the equation becomes more complicated as the number of radical expressions increases.

Are there any restrictions when solving radical equation 2?

Yes, when solving a radical equation 2, you must check for any restrictions on the variables that would make the radical expression undefined. These restrictions may lead to extraneous solutions that are not valid for the original equation.

Similar threads

Replies
41
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top