- #1
stevmg
- 696
- 3
In certain physics textbooks, one starts with the assumption (in a one linear and one time dimension) that
1) x2 - c2t2 = x'2 - c2t'2
I don't want to go into that. Let us start from there.
Now, if you assume that
2) x = vt, then
3) x' = 0 always because the origin is moving at v along the x-axis so that x' is always zero.
Using those three bits of information one can derive the Lorentz equations:
x' = [tex]\gamma[/tex](x - vt)
t' = [tex]\gamma[/tex](t - xv/c2)
where [tex]\gamma[/tex] = SQRT[1 - v2/c2] (I can't get the square root to come out in LATEX)
I have tried, tried, tried to do that but I cannot.
Anyone can help?
If I substitute the Lorentz equations back into the above three bits of information, it will work out but that's backwards. I want to do it forwards.
1) x2 - c2t2 = x'2 - c2t'2
I don't want to go into that. Let us start from there.
Now, if you assume that
2) x = vt, then
3) x' = 0 always because the origin is moving at v along the x-axis so that x' is always zero.
Using those three bits of information one can derive the Lorentz equations:
x' = [tex]\gamma[/tex](x - vt)
t' = [tex]\gamma[/tex](t - xv/c2)
where [tex]\gamma[/tex] = SQRT[1 - v2/c2] (I can't get the square root to come out in LATEX)
I have tried, tried, tried to do that but I cannot.
Anyone can help?
If I substitute the Lorentz equations back into the above three bits of information, it will work out but that's backwards. I want to do it forwards.