How Can You Roll a 13 Using 2 Dice?

  • Thread starter dkotschessaa
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Dice Roll
In summary: Consider the base as 12 and roll a 1 and 1.If one objects that you can't tell which die is the 12's digit one can roll one die at a time so you know which is the first of the ordered pair. No one said that there can't be gaps in the result rolled. But what I think is the best answer (in line with the op's original post ) is to consider the result in base 5; then, if you roll a 6+2, it would be 13 in base 5.Dies don't have bases, you just count the number of dots, 8 is 13 in base 5. You could also roll a 6+4 to get a 13
  • #1
dkotschessaa
1,060
783
Originally posted on another forum with the title "are some things impossible?" The question was more of a philosophical one, but it got me thinking mathematically.

I thought I had a solution like this:

Put die #1 in a base 5 numbering system, you get the following values for the 6 rolls for die 1.
Roll Value (in base 5)
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 10
6 11

If you keep the second die in base 10 then, the rolls (5,3) and (6,2) give you 13.

But that's like trying to add 1 (binary) to decimal 2 and getting 3. I think I'm onto something but I don't know how to express it yet. Any ideas?

-Dave KA
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No, [itex]11_5+ 3_{10}\ne 13[/itex] in any base! If you are determined to get a roll of 13 with two dice, replace 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 on one die with 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12. then "13" would correspond to a roll of (1, 12).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
You could label one die with 0,6,12,18,24,30.
Then with the other, normal die, each result in the range 1-36 will be equally likely.
 
  • #4
If one desired to make 13, in essence, the new 7, then you could label the dice as a straight run from 1 --> 6, and then 7 --> 12, in which case the least likely rolls would be 8 and 18.

6, 7 --> 13
5, 8 --> 13
4, 9 --> 13
3, 10 --> 13
2, 11 --> 13
1, 12 --> 13

6, 12 --> 18
1, 7 --> 8
 
  • #5
I think when the OP (on the other forum) said "ordinary dice" he meant those labeled 1-6, meaning one dot up to six dots. So I was trying to come up with a way to do it without changing the dots themselves. That's why I thought of a different base numbering system. So the symbols could stay the same but represent something else.
 
  • #6
dkotschessaa said:
I was trying to come up with a way to do it without changing the dots themselves.

Not sure if this is what you were getting at, but here are some equivalencies to base 10 dice rolls in other bases...

10 --> b4, b5, b6, b7, b8, b9
---------------------------------
02 --> 02, 02, 02, 02, 02, 02
03 --> 03, 03, 03, 03, 03, 03
04 --> 10, 04, 04, 04, 04, 04
05 --> 11, 10, 05, 05, 05, 05
06 --> 12, 11, 10, 06, 06, 06
07 --> 13, 12, 11, 10, 07, 07
08 --> 20, 13, 12, 11, 10, 08
09 --> 21, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10
10 --> 22, 20, 14, 13, 12, 11
11 --> 23, 21, 15, 14, 13, 12
12 --> 30, 22, 20, 15, 14, 13

If, as per my previous post, one wanted to make 13 the new 7 (i.e. the most likely roll), base 4 would be the way to go.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
dkotschessaa said:
Originally posted on another forum with the title "are some things impossible?" The question was more of a philosophical one, but it got me thinking mathematically.

I thought I had a solution like this:

Put die #1 in a base 5 numbering system, you get the following values for the 6 rolls for die 1.
Roll Value (in base 5)
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 10
6 11

If you keep the second die in base 10 then, the rolls (5,3) and (6,2) give you 13.

But that's like trying to add 1 (binary) to decimal 2 and getting 3. I think I'm onto something but I don't know how to express it yet. Any ideas?

-Dave KA

Use dice of different colors. Choose one color and add 6 to each face.
 
  • #8
Perhaps one easy way is to interpret the dice result as in base 8; thus 6 + 5 = 13 (base 8).

It sounds like cheating to me, anyway. :)
 
  • #9
Dodo said:
Perhaps one easy way is to interpret the dice result as in base 8; thus 6 + 5 = 13 (base 8).

I think that's what I'm after. Simple! I'm not good with different bases.

It sounds like cheating to me, anyway. :)

Totally. It was just a mathematical answer to a non-mathematical question on a board of sci-fi geeks.

-M
 
  • #10
Dodo said:
Perhaps one easy way is to interpret the dice result as in base 8; thus 6 + 5 = 13 (base 8).

It sounds like cheating to me, anyway. :)

Consider the base as 12 and roll a 1 and 1. If one objects that you can't tell which die is the 12's digit one can roll one die at a time so you know which is the first of the ordered pair. No one said that there can't be gaps in the result rolled. But what I think is the best answer (in line with the op's original post ) is to consider the result in base 5; then, if you roll a 6+2, it would be 13 in base 5. Dies don't have bases, you just count the number of dots, 8 is 13 in base 5. You could also roll a 6+4 to get a 13 in base 7
 
Last edited:

FAQ: How Can You Roll a 13 Using 2 Dice?

How likely is it to roll a 13 using 2 ordinary dice?

It is not possible to roll a 13 using 2 ordinary dice as the maximum sum that can be achieved is 12 (6+6).

Can rolling two 6-sided dice ever result in a sum of 13?

No, as mentioned before, the highest possible sum from rolling two 6-sided dice is 12 (6+6).

Is it possible to modify the dice to roll a 13?

No, modifying the dice would not change their basic properties and the maximum sum would still be 12.

What is the probability of rolling a 13 with two dice if one of them has more than 6 sides?

The probability would still be 0, as the maximum sum would still be the same regardless of the number of sides on one of the dice.

Can rolling two 6-sided dice ever result in a sum of 13 if one of them is loaded?

No, loading a dice would only affect the chances of getting certain numbers, but it would not change the maximum sum that can be achieved.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
53
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
41
Views
4K
Back
Top