How Did Einstein Formulate E=mc²?

In summary, there is some debate about how Einstein came up with his famous equation, with some suggesting it was an educated guess and others stating it was derived mathematically. His 1905 paper on special relativity initially only included the kinetic energy equation, but a few months later he released a paper which showed the relationship between mass and energy. This paper eventually led to the famous equation E=mc^2.
  • #1
narrator
241
17
I've been Googling to find out how Einstein worked out his famous equation. Some texts (that may or may not be factual) suggest it was an educated guess and not even expressed as the equation initially. Wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E=mc2#Einstein:_mass.E2.80.93energy_equivalence" that Planck was critical of the initial formula. Others go into a more dry discourse on historical moments that led to it.

Does anyone have a link to something reliably factual that leads you along the trail of his discovery in a way that a layman could understand?

One aspect that I've often found difficult to follow is how light speed came to be connected with it. From the outside, the connection isn't readily apparent. I read here somewhere that it has some connection to F=ma.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
  • #3
narrator said:
Some texts (that may or may not be factual) suggest it was an educated guess and not even expressed as the equation initially.
According to Feynmann, making an educated guess is the correct first step in the scientific process. However, I don't think e = mc^2 falls into that category. Rather, it was derived mathematically from an educated guess that he made earlier that same year and which concerned the constancy of the speed of light in a vacuum. You are correct, however, that the expression was something other than an equation (sort of). Following the link given by phyzguy, we see:
A. Einstein said:
If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c²
That's how he expressed it. It is an equation, but it's not dressed up like one.
 
  • #4
Einstein's big 1905 paper on [what we now call] special relativity, "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies," A. Einstein, Annelen der Physik, June 30, 1905, Einstein calculates the kinetic energy (energy of motion), W, of a particle to be



And using somewhat more modern notation, and defining ,





Of course, that's just the kinetic energy only. There's nothing about total energy, or even rest energy in that equation. But it might make one scratch one's head, "where are all these mc2 terms coming from? It seems important." Although a bit of a jump, it turns out that is the total energy of body, and is the rest energy. The total minus rest energy is the kinetic energy. And it's interesting that the above formula for W reduces to the Newtonian W ≈ ½mv2 for v near 0, using the Taylor series expansion. But "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies" doesn't take it that far. That paper doesn't make such assumptions about total energy and rest energy.

A few months later Einstein released his "Does the Inertia of a Body Depend Upon Its Energy Content?" paper, that Phyzguy mentioned above. This paper uses the Doppler shift, combined with conservation of energy to show that if a body releases energy E, its mass must decrease by a corresponding amount. And that amount is E/c2. (And like Jimmy Snyder mentioned, the notation and variables are different than what are shown in this post, but with just a change in variables and a little algebra, you can get the E = mc2.)
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Great post, collinsmark!
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
12K
Replies
53
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
38
Views
45K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Back
Top