How did Madhava come up with the Arctan series?

  • Thread starter Thread starter imurme8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
Click For Summary
Madhava's discovery of the arctangent power series is questioned regarding the methods he used, as he likely lacked formal concepts like the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus or uniform convergence. The discussion suggests that Indian mathematicians may have understood infinite geometric series and their connection to trigonometric functions, which could have influenced Madhava's work. There is a recognition that much of Indian mathematics lacks detailed explanations, often presenting results without accompanying reasoning. Some insights into Madhava's methods are noted to be found in writings by his followers. Overall, the conversation highlights the mystery surrounding the origins of Madhava's mathematical contributions.
imurme8
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know how Madhava discovered the power series for the arctangent? I think the standard way is to note that 1-x^2+x^4-\dotsb converges uniformly on (-1,1) to \frac{d}{dt}\tan^{-1}x, and thus applying the fundamental theorem of calculus we may integrate term-by-term. But how did Madhava do it? I don't know that he had the FTOC or a concept of uniform convergence, or even that he knew how to integrate a polynomial.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
obviously it was revealed by vishnu.
 
mathwonk said:
obviously it was revealed by vishnu.

That made me laugh.
 
The problem with much of Indian mathematics is that it is in the form: "See!", with no attendant explanations.
Presumably, such explanations were developed in the local schools and research centres, but we have not, unfortunately, been handed down lecture notes and such from those days.

If I were to make a guess, I would think they were well aware of the sum of an infinite geometric series, and that the result given has a close relationship to their understanding of how 1/(1+x^2) appeared within trigonometry.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K