- #36
Skyhunter
And if they had voted against him they would have been labeled obstructionist and suffered the "The president has a right to appoint who he wants." rhetoric that always accompanies any objection to Bush's appointees.kat said:I'm not sure how you can really call his appointment controversial when congress put him there by a vote of..what 89 to 0? not sure the exact number of fors..by I know there were no against.
So now it is congresses fault?
Why do you keep trying to shift the blame?
Are you really that committed to the smirking chimp?