How Do Diameter, Focal Length, and Distance Affect Whisper Dish Efficiency?

In summary, the efficiency of a whisper dish is influenced by its diameter, focal length, and the distance between the dish and the sound source. A larger diameter enhances sound capture and directionality, while an optimal focal length ensures that sound waves converge effectively at the focal point. Additionally, maintaining an appropriate distance from the sound source is crucial for maximizing sound clarity and minimizing background noise, ultimately improving the overall performance of the dish.
  • #1
jds10011
38
0
TL;DR Summary
We know that satellite and other dishes are parabolic. What factors determine which parabola is used and how well they work?
We're trying to build working models of "whisper dishes" -- two large parabolic dishes placed at a distance and pointed at each other, allowing two people to communicate by whispering at the focal point of one dish and listening at the focal point of the other (or vice versa). At a fairly rudimentary level, we are looking for more information on how well this setup will work based on (a) the diameter of the dish (b) the focal length of the dish (c) how much of the parabola is present, if not already accounted for in (a) and (b), and (d) how far apart the dishes are placed. Can you point us in the right direction of better understanding? At the very least, what is likely to be a "good" shape/size for our model (what equation would we use and what diameter, along with what distance)? (And, yes, we're aware that the dish needs to be large enough that the speaker's/listener's head isn't blocking the "signal".)

Also, we are curious if the answer would be different for other applications, such as a dish for satellite tv, or the classic parabolic reflector dish used for frying eggs on a sunny day.

Lastly, we are wondering how much tolerance there is in these setups -- for example, if the aim is slightly imprecise, if the speaker/listener is slightly off from the focal point, if the shape of the parabola is slightly imprecise in the construction of the model, etc. -- at the very least, what are major and minor sources of error?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Experiment with a couple of used satellite dishes, if you can find them.

The beam between the two dishes is roughly parallel, so the distance between dishes is not a big problem.

For voice, a dish with a diameter of between 1 and 2 metres is OK. The focal length should be similar, with the dish depth about half that, so the person speaking and listening, is outside the dish, while most of the voice will "illuminate" the dish surface. The head of the operator should be at the focus, so different people need to stand or sit at different heights, without needing a stepladder.

Surface accuracy should be ± λ / 20 at the highest frequency.
For 3 kHz audio, λ = 343 / 3kHz = 115 mm.
The surface accuracy should be better than; 115 / 5 = ±6mm.
Holes in the surface must be smaller than λ / 10 = 12 mm.


The dish profile can be shaped by rotating a profile pattern in a sandpit, then the dish can be cast from concrete, and used as part of a garden wall.

For a flattish dish, a shallow spherical surface may be close enough.
If you need more room, you can use a flat wall as a plane reflector along the path.

You may get away with the top half of the dish only, if you have only one, and cut it in two. The bottom half of the dishes are partly obstructed by the body of the operator, and other obstructions or people in the area.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acoustic_mirror
 
  • #3
Baluncore said:
Surface accuracy should be ± λ / 20 at the highest frequency.
That's a fair rule of thumb for an ideal source / detector (tiny microphone) at the focus. But a head (plus two ears) will be about 200+mm so the focused sound image needs to be no better than that. So I doubt that performance would suffer with a spherical profile.
Baluncore said:
The dish profile can be shaped by rotating a profile pattern in a sandpit, then the dish can be cast from concrete, and used as part of a garden wall.
A good, cheap solution, if it doesn't need to be pointable. If you don't mind the smell then fibreglass is light and fairly cheap. For indoors, papier maché is even cheaper and easy to fabricate.

I like the idea of using less than a full hemisphere. Much easier to mount and rotate.
 
  • #4
Baluncore said:
... and used as part of a garden wall.
Always good to know what the neighbors are up to
 
  • Haha
Likes berkeman
  • #5
A.T. said:
Always good to know what the neighbors are up to
The advantage of an offset-fed dish, with a microphone at the focus, is that your neighbours do not know you are listening.
 

FAQ: How Do Diameter, Focal Length, and Distance Affect Whisper Dish Efficiency?

What is the relationship between the diameter of a whisper dish and its efficiency?

The diameter of a whisper dish is directly related to its efficiency. A larger diameter allows the dish to capture more sound waves, which can then be focused more precisely onto the focal point. This results in a stronger and clearer transmission of sound from one dish to another, enhancing the overall efficiency.

How does the focal length influence the performance of a whisper dish?

The focal length is the distance between the dish and its focal point, where the sound waves converge. A correctly calculated focal length ensures that sound waves are focused accurately, maximizing the clarity and volume of the transmitted sound. If the focal length is too short or too long, the sound waves may not converge properly, reducing the efficiency of the whisper dish.

What role does the distance between two whisper dishes play in their efficiency?

The distance between two whisper dishes affects the efficiency of sound transmission. For optimal performance, the dishes should be positioned at a distance that allows the sound waves to travel without significant loss of energy. If the distance is too great, the sound waves may dissipate before reaching the receiving dish. Conversely, if the distance is too short, the sound waves may not spread out sufficiently, leading to overlapping and interference.

Can environmental factors impact the efficiency of whisper dishes?

Yes, environmental factors such as wind, temperature, humidity, and obstacles can impact the efficiency of whisper dishes. Wind can cause sound waves to scatter, while temperature and humidity can affect the speed and direction of sound waves. Obstacles like buildings or trees can block or reflect sound waves, reducing the effectiveness of the dishes. Ideal conditions for whisper dishes are calm, clear, and unobstructed environments.

How can the efficiency of a whisper dish system be optimized?

To optimize the efficiency of a whisper dish system, ensure that the dishes have a large enough diameter to capture adequate sound waves and that the focal length is precisely calculated. Position the dishes at an optimal distance from each other in an environment with minimal interference. Regular maintenance and alignment checks can also help maintain the system's efficiency over time.

Similar threads

Back
Top