How Do Electrons Behave in a Half-Filled P Orbital?

  • Thread starter DiracPool
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the production of orbitals in the atom and the concept that they should not be thought of as classical orbits. The discussion then focuses on p orbitals and whether the electrons are confined to one or both lobes and if there have been experiments to demonstrate this. It is clarified that the probability density vanishes at z = 0 but the electron can still be found in either lobe. The conversation also touches on the symmetrical nature of p orbitals and the fact that the electrons do not "zip" around the orbital. It is concluded that a single electron occupies both lobes with a charge density according to the probability density and when a second electron is added, they both occupy both
  • #1
DiracPool
1,243
516
I recently have been studying how the SE solutions produce orbitals in the atom. I understand that we are not to think of these classically as actual orbits, however, I am looking for a little clarification on a couple things. For one, it is relatively easy to see how two electrons may share a 1s spherical orbital. But what about a p orbital? Is each electron confined to one or the other lobes of the dumbbell? After all, there is a zero probability that the electron can be found between the lobes and therefore a zero probability that it can smoothly transition (classically at least) between the two.

I know that this is QM and that we are supposed to allow for these counterintuitive things to happen, but has there actually been any experiments that conclusively demonstrate that, in a half-filled p orbital, the SAME electron is found zipping around both lobes of the orbital. Or is it typically found in just one? In addition, are there any experiments that tell us whether two electrons filling a p orbital can be found in either lobe? Or that both can be found in one lobe at the same time and not the other? I’m guessing that if measurements have found that both electrons demonstrating opposite spins have an equal probability of being in either lobe at any given time, then I’ll have to accept that. I’m just looking for a less counterintuitive solution or visualization.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
First, there is no way to tell if two electrons are the same or different, other than measuring both positions at the same time. Most measurements look at a time-averaged charge density.

One can calculate the position of one electron in the frame where the other electron is at 0,0,0. I expect it's a numerical mess, and I suspect that most of the time it is in the other lobe, but not always.
 
  • #3
"After all, there is a zero probability that the electron can be found between the lobes and therefore a zero probability that it can smoothly transition (classically at least) between the two."
Be careful. This is a probability density, not a probability. The prob. density vanishes only in a set of measure zero, so your intuitive picture is not really mathematically well-defined. I think.
If you have two electrons in the same p-Orbital, each has the same probability density (ignoring the complication of Coulomb repulsion between the electrons).
BTw, it's the same with the higher s-Orbitals - they all have radius values where psi vanishes.
 
  • #4
Is each electron confined to one or the other lobes of the dumbbell? After all, there is a zero probability that the electron can be found between the lobes and therefore a zero probability that it can smoothly transition (classically at least) between the two.
No, as you say the orbital represents the probability of finding the electron at a particular point. The fact that it vanishes at z = 0 simply means that you won't ever find it at z = 0. But you can find it on either side - the electron does not have a continuous orbital motion, and therefore does not have to transition from one lobe to the other. It can be found in either lobe.
has there actually been any experiments that conclusively demonstrate that, in a half-filled p orbital, the SAME electron is found zipping around both lobes of the orbital. Or is it typically found in just one?
It don't zip, it just sits there! :smile: No, there is no doubt about this. The orbital is symmetrical in the z direction. If the electron occupied just one of the two lobes (choosing a lobe at random?) there would be two possible states, not one, which would be in total conflict with observation.
 
  • #5
It don't zip, it just sits there! No, there is no doubt about this. The orbital is symmetrical in the z direction. If the electron occupied just one of the two lobes (choosing a lobe at random?) there would be two possible states, not one, which would be in total conflict with observation.

So, would it be accurate to say that a single electron in a p-orbital is not zipping around the orbital? It just simply occupies both lobes with a charge density distributed according to the probability density? And then when a second electron comes around the first electron simply accommodates it through both electrons mutually orienting their "spins" orthogonally to one another (however that trick may be manifested)?

In that scenario, then, I would assume that both electrons occupy both lobes of the orbital with a relatively equal charge density distribution distinguished only by some spin factor? Again, in that scenario, is there any way to distinguish one electron from the other, i.e., is there some inhomogeneity of the charge density distributions that may distinguish one electron from the other? Or, is there no way to distinguish them and we simply say that two electrons share this orbital with opposite spins and that's about all we can say about it?
 
  • #6
"that's about all we can say about it?"
Yup
 

FAQ: How Do Electrons Behave in a Half-Filled P Orbital?

1. How can we overcome the obstacle of not being able to get from one place to another?

The first step is to identify the root cause of the problem. Is it due to physical barriers, lack of transportation options, or other factors? Once the cause is determined, potential solutions can be explored.

2. Can technology play a role in helping us get from one place to another?

Yes, technology can provide various solutions such as navigation apps, ride-sharing services, and even futuristic modes of transportation like flying cars. However, it is important to consider the cost, accessibility, and sustainability of these options.

3. Are there any psychological barriers that may prevent us from getting to our desired destination?

Absolutely. Fear, anxiety, and lack of confidence can all hinder our ability to get from one place to another. It is important to address these barriers and seek support if needed.

4. How can we improve the infrastructure to make it easier to get from one place to another?

Investment in public transportation, bike lanes, and pedestrian-friendly spaces can greatly improve accessibility and connectivity between different locations. It is also important to consider the needs and preferences of different communities when planning infrastructure improvements.

5. What are some alternative modes of transportation that can help us get from one place to another?

Aside from the traditional modes of transportation such as cars and public transportation, options like biking, walking, and micro-mobility (e.g. electric scooters) can be viable alternatives. These options not only help with transportation but also promote a healthier lifestyle and reduce carbon emissions.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top