MHB How do I calculate the side of a rhombus using the bisector of an angle theorem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yankel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Theorem
AI Thread Summary
To determine the side of a rhombus using the bisector of an angle theorem, it is established that if AB/BC = AD/DC, then the parallelogram is a rhombus. The first part of the problem is confirmed correct. For the second part, with given values AB=9, AC=10, and BC=AD=x, the equation 9/x = x/(10-x) leads to a quadratic equation with a unique positive solution. By applying properties of similar triangles, it is derived that ED equals 3.6. The calculations confirm the side length of the rhombus.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I have this question I struggle with...

View attachment 7836

EDFB is a parallelogram. It is known that AB/BC = AD/DC.

1) Prove that the parallelogram is a rhombus.

2) It is given that: AB=9, AC=10, BC=AD. Calculate the side of the rhombus.

I think I solved the first part. There is a theorem called the "bisector of an angle theorem" according to which if AB/BC = AD/DC then the line BD is a bisector of an angle of the angle B and then a parallelogram in which the diagonal is a bisector of an angle is a rhombus. Am I correct ?

I have a problem with the second part. I can't figure out how to solve it. The answer should be 3.6. I have tried the intercept theorem (or Thales' theorem), but couldn't figure it out.

Can you kindly assist to in the second part of the question ?

Thank you in advance !
 

Attachments

  • aaaa.PNG
    aaaa.PNG
    1.9 KB · Views: 108
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yankel said:
Hello all,

I have this question I struggle with...
EDFB is a parallelogram. It is known that AB/BC = AD/DC.

1) Prove that the parallelogram is a rhombus.

2) It is given that: AB=9, AC=10, BC=AD. Calculate the side of the rhombus.

I think I solved the first part. There is a theorem called the "bisector of an angle theorem" according to which if AB/BC = AD/DC then the line BD is a bisector of an angle of the angle B and then a parallelogram in which the diagonal is a bisector of an angle is a rhombus. Am I correct ?
Yes.
Yankel said:
I have a problem with the second part. I can't figure out how to solve it. The answer should be 3.6. I have tried the intercept theorem (or Thales' theorem), but couldn't figure it out.

Can you kindly assist to in the second part of the question ?

If BC = AD = x, then the equation AB/BC = AD/DC becomes 9/x = x/(10-x), a quadratic for x with a unique positive solution.

From the similar triangles AED and ABC you can then calculate that ED/x = x/10, which gives ED = 3.6.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top