How do I correctly find the Christoffel symbol for a specific component?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jordy1113
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Christoffel Symbol
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the Christoffel symbol \(\Gamma^{i}_{00}\) and whether it equals zero. The user sets up the equation correctly but seeks confirmation on their calculation. Participants suggest calculating additional components to gain confidence in the results, noting that if not all components are zero, it may indicate a more complex metric. The user mentions they have already calculated other symbols, which were verified by their professor, but they need reassurance on this specific one. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the metric being used in the calculations.
jordy1113
Messages
12
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Find Christoffel symbol
Relevant Equations
$$
\Gamma^l_{ki} = \frac{1}{2} g^{lj} (\partial_k g_{ij} + \partial_i g_{jk} - \partial_j g_{ki})
$$
\begin{eqnarray}
g_{00}(x,t)=1\\
g_{0i}(x,t)=0\\
g_{ij}(x,t)=a^{2}(t)[\delta_{ij}+h_{ij}(x,t)]\\
\end{eqnarray}
I was not given a formal teaching on christoffel symbols and how to find them so I just need some help.
I'm trying to find the cristoffel symbol:
\begin{equation}
\Gamma^{i}_{00}
\end{equation}
I set my equation up as:
\begin{equation}
\Gamma^i_{00} = \frac{1}{2} g^{ij} (\partial_0 g_{0j} + \partial_0 g_{0j} - \partial_j g_{00})
\end{equation}
Am I correct in getting that this christoffel symbol is equal to zero? If not what am I doing wrong? Many thanks in advance (sorry I am still trying to figure out the latex on the forum)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
From (5) you seem to be right. Why do not you calculate general jk components not only 00 ?
If not all components are zero, you would have some confidence.
 
You're right, but what kind of metric is this?
 
haushofer said:
You're right, but what kind of metric is this?
cosmological synchronous gauge according to Dodelson and Schmidt
 
anuttarasammyak said:
From (5) you seem to be right. Why do not you calculate general jk components not only 00 ?
If not all components are zero, you would have some confidence.
thanks, I calculated some of the other christoffel symbols already and my professor checked them, we just forgot to do this one so I needed some reassurance I was doing it correctly
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top