How do I determine if it's a Hermitian Operator or not

In summary, the conversation discusses the definition and properties of Hermitian operators, specifically in relation to proving whether or not i(d/dx) or (d^2)/(dx^2) are Hermitian operators. The recommended method is to put the operator in an integral and use integration by parts, with the understanding that the operator must be densly defined and its adjoint identified. Some resources for refreshing on integration by parts are also mentioned.
  • #1
MixilPlixit
5
0
First post so please go easy on me, here goes:

I have looked over the basic definition of what is a Hermitian operator such as: <f|Qf> = <Qf|f> but I still am unclear what to do with this definition if I am asked prove whether or not i(d/dx) or (d^2)/(dx^2) for example are Hermitian operators. I am using Griffiths' "Intro to Quantum Mechanics" and it really seems like he skips a lot of steps. Steps I need to make sure I understand. Can someone help enlighten me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You have to put the operator in the integral \int\psi*[id/dx]\psi dx.
Then integrate by parts, using the BC at the endpoints. If you get the same result after integratilng by part, the operator is hermitian.
 
  • #3
Meir Achuz said:
You have to put the operator in the integral \int\psi*[id/dx]\psi dx.
Then integrate by parts, using the BC at the endpoints. If you get the same result after integratilng by part, the operator is hermitian.

This is exactly how it's done in Griffiths too. Maybe Mixil had some specific part of this in mind?
 
  • #4
I think I am a little hazy on integration by parts, so that apeears to be where my problem lies. Can someone recommend a good refresher on the matter?
 
  • #5
http://archives.math.utk.edu/visual.calculus/4/int_by_parts.3/
I just found this on google, and it appears to be a nice introduction, and takes you through each step. Perhaps a little basic for what you want though?
Hope it helps,
~Gareth
 
  • #6
OK, that somewhat helps but if I have [tex]\int \frac{d^2}{d \phi^2}d \phi[/tex] how do I evaluate that? It's been a while since calc obviously. It's the 2nd derivative thing that's throwing me. Hopefully I am not tiring you guys, cause I am certainly getting bleary. Thanks for your help this far. I am thankful for your continued assistance.
 
  • #7
MixilPlixit said:
OK, that somewhat helps but if I have [tex]\int \frac{d^2}{d \phi^2}d \phi[/tex] how do I evaluate that?

You can't evaluate that. On what is [itex]\frac{d^2}{d \phi^2}[/itex] operating?

Regards,
George
 
  • #8
I am given [tex]Q = \frac{d^2}{d \phi^2} [/tex] And am asked to prove if eigenvalues are real. In order to do that I need to determine if Q is in fact a Hermitian operator. So I am at: [tex] \int f*(\frac{d^2}{d \phi^2})g d\phi[/tex] This is integrated over 0 to 2 pi.
 
Last edited:
  • #9
You need to use integration by parts twice. For the first integration by parts, it may be helpful to think of

[tex]\left( \frac{d^2}{d \phi^2} \right)g[/tex]

as

[tex]\frac{dg'}{d \phi}[/tex]

where

[tex]g' = \frac{dg}{d \phi}.[/tex]

Regards,
George
 
  • #10
For the first integration then would [tex]v = \frac{dg}{d \phi} [/tex] and [tex] du = (\frac{df}{d\phi})^*[/tex]?

[edit] Well I think I solved it, but it feels wrong. I got [tex]-\int f^*(\frac{d^2}{d \phi^2}) g d\phi[/tex] It the initial integral but minus. Can that be right?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Assuming the operator is densly defined, can u at least identify the operator's adjoint...? Next thing to worry you is to find whether your operator is bounded or not...

Daniel.
 

FAQ: How do I determine if it's a Hermitian Operator or not

1. How do I determine if an operator is Hermitian?

To determine if an operator is Hermitian, you must check if it satisfies the condition of Hermiticity. This means that the operator must be equal to its own conjugate transpose. In mathematical terms, this can be written as A = A*, where A* is the conjugate transpose of A.

2. What is the significance of a Hermitian operator?

A Hermitian operator has important properties that make it useful in quantum mechanics. It ensures that the eigenvalues of the operator are real, and the eigenvectors are orthogonal. This allows for simpler calculations and makes it easier to interpret the results in physical terms.

3. Can a non-square matrix be Hermitian?

No, a non-square matrix cannot be Hermitian. The condition of Hermiticity requires the operator to be square, meaning it has the same number of rows and columns. Non-square matrices do not have a conjugate transpose, which is necessary for the operator to be Hermitian.

4. Is every Hermitian operator also a unitary operator?

No, not every Hermitian operator is also a unitary operator. While all unitary operators are Hermitian, the reverse is not true. A unitary operator must also satisfy the condition of being unitary, which means its inverse is equal to its conjugate transpose.

5. How can I use the Hermitian property to simplify calculations?

The Hermitian property can be used to simplify calculations by taking advantage of the fact that the eigenvalues of a Hermitian operator are real. This means that instead of working with complex numbers, you can work with real numbers, making calculations easier and more intuitive. Additionally, the eigenvectors of a Hermitian operator are orthogonal, which can also simplify calculations.

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
6K
Back
Top