MHB How do I find an equation of the line with a given x-intercept and point?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To find the equation of the line that passes through the point (6, 2) and shares the x-intercept with the line -2x + y = 1, the x-intercept is calculated by setting y to 0, resulting in the point (-1/2, 0). With both points (-1/2, 0) and (6, 2), the slope can be computed. The point-slope formula is then applied using one of the points and the calculated slope. Finally, the equation is rearranged into the slope-intercept form y = ax + b.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Find an equation of the line that passes through (6, 2) and has the same x-intercept as the line -2x + y = 1.

As a first step, I must let y = 0 in the given equation.

-2x + y = 1

-2x + 0 = 1

-2x = 1

x = -1/2

The x-intercept is (-1/2, 0) creating the second point needed to find the slope.

What is next?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Okay, you now have two points on the line, so you can compute the slope, and then you have the slope and point(s) on the line, so the point-slope formula will be useful:

$$y-y_1=m\left(x-x_1\right)$$

:D
 
MarkFL said:
Okay, you now have two points on the line, so you can compute the slope, and then you have the slope and point(s) on the line, so the point-slope formula will be useful:

$$y-y_1=m\left(x-x_1\right)$$

:D

Perfect. It's easier than I thought.
 
Equivalently, any (non-vertical) line can be written in the form y= ax+ b. Knowing that the line goes through (-1/2, 0) tells you that 0= a(-1/2)+ b. Knowing that the line goes through (6, 2) tells you that 2= a(6)+ b, giving two equations to solve for a and b. You can immediately eliminate b by subtracting one equation from the other which gives precisely the previous method.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Equivalently, any (non-vertical) line can be written in the form y= ax+ b. Knowing that the line goes through (-1/2, 0) tells you that 0= a(-1/2)+ b. Knowing that the line goes through (6, 2) tells you that 2= a(6)+ b, giving two equations to solve for a and b. You can immediately eliminate b by subtracting one equation from the other which gives precisely the previous method.
Good data here.
 
Find an equation of the line that passes through (6, 2) and has the same x-intercept as the line -2x + y = 1.

As a first step, I must let y = 0 in the given equation.

-2x + y = 1

-2x + 0 = 1

-2x = 1

x = -1/2

The x-intercept is (-1/2, 0) creating the second point needed to find the slope.

I will now solve the given equation for y.

-2x + y = 1

y= 2x + 1

The equation I need to find can be found by finding the slope using (-1/2, 0) and (6, 2).

I then plug one of the points and the slope into the point-slope formula. As a last step, solve the equation for y.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top