How do I find the most efficient way to find P?

  • MHB
  • Thread starter Poirot1
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Ratio
In summary: Kind regards $\chi$ $\sigma$In summary, the conversation discussed finding the most efficient way to find the point P given the coordinates of B and C and the ratio of BP to PC. The suggested method was to use the equation of a quadratic curve to find the coordinates of P, which turned out to be (10,16). Further information about Circles of Apollonius was also provided.
  • #1
Poirot1
245
0
Let B=(5,21), C=(40,-14) and $\frac{BP}{PC}$=1/6. What is the most efficent way to find P? My book just states P=(6/7)B+(1/7)C but no idea how they got that.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You might find this topic helpful:

http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f11/distance-between-two-points-cartesian-plane-2646/
 
  • #3
Poirot said:
Let B=(5,21), C=(40,-14) and $\frac{BP}{PC}$=1/6. What is the most efficent way to find P? My book just states P=(6/7)B+(1/7)C but no idea how they got that.

Draw a sketch.
 

Attachments

  • streckteilg.png
    streckteilg.png
    3.4 KB · Views: 49
  • #4
Poirot said:
Let B=(5,21), C=(40,-14) and $\frac{BP}{PC}$=1/6. What is the most efficent way to find P? My book just states P=(6/7)B+(1/7)C but no idea how they got that.

If x and y are the coordinates of P, then it must be...

$\displaystyle f(x,y)= 36\ (x-5)^{2} + 36\ (y-21)^{2} - (x-40)^{2} - (y+14)^{2}=0$ (1)

The (1) is a 'quadratic curve' as illustrated in...

Quadratic Curve -- from Wolfram MathWorld

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
  • #5

Attachments

  • MSP41731a47g3d05716a20700002ehg1651i5ig1c7c.gif
    MSP41731a47g3d05716a20700002ehg1651i5ig1c7c.gif
    2.6 KB · Views: 50
Last edited:
  • #6
Hello, Poirot!

Did you make a sketch?


Let $B=(5,21),\;C=(40,\text{-}14),\;\dfrac{BP}{PC}=\dfrac{1}{6}$

What is the most efficent way to find $P$ ?

Code:
      |
      | (5,21)   +35
      |  B♥ → → → → → → +
      |     *           ↓
      |      Po         ↓
      |         *       ↓ -35
  ----+-----------*-----↓------
      |             *   ↓
      |               * ↓
      |                 ♥C
      |              (40,-14)
      |
Going from $B$ to $C$, we move 35 right and 35 down.

Point $P$ is $\tfrac{1}{7}$ of the way from $B$ to $C$.

The x-coordinate is $\tfrac{1}{7}$ of the way from $5$ to $40$.
. . Hence: .$x \;=\;5 + \tfrac{1}{7}(40-5) \;=\;5 + \tfrac{1}{7}(35) \;=\;5 + 5 \;=\;10$

The y-coordinate is $\tfrac{1}{7}$ of the way from $21$ to $\text{-}14.$
. . Hence: .$y \;=\;21 + \tfrac{1}{7}(\text{-}14 - 21) \;=\;21 + \tfrac{1}{7}(\text{-}35) \;=\;21 - 5 \;=\;16$Therefore, $P$ is at $(10,16).$
 
  • #7
Poirot said:
Let B=(5,21), C=(40,-14) and $\frac{BP}{PC}$=1/6. What is the most efficent way to find P? My book just states P=(6/7)B+(1/7)C but no idea how they got that.

If your book gives that answer then you have not posted the question as asked, or omitted implied side conditions for the question set.

The quoted answer implies that you want a point P between B and C, while the statement does not so constrain P and defines a locus in the plane.

In future please post the question as asked and include any additional constraints implied by the topic you are studying and or the common conditions in force on a question set.

CB
 
  • #8
I've solved this now thanks to the answers.
 
  • #9

FAQ: How do I find the most efficient way to find P?

What is the definition of ratio of lengths?

The ratio of lengths refers to the comparison of the length of one object or distance to another, expressed as a fraction or decimal.

How do you calculate the ratio of lengths?

To calculate the ratio of lengths, divide the length of one object or distance by the other. This will result in a decimal or fraction that represents the ratio.

What is the importance of understanding the ratio of lengths?

Understanding the ratio of lengths is important in many scientific and mathematical applications, as it allows for accurate comparisons and measurements.

Can the ratio of lengths be greater than 1?

Yes, the ratio of lengths can be greater than 1. This indicates that the first length is longer than the second length being compared to.

How is the ratio of lengths different from the proportion?

The ratio of lengths compares two lengths or distances, while a proportion compares two ratios. A proportion is essentially a comparison of two ratios, and can be solved using cross-multiplication.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
617
Back
Top