How do I see this? Simplification

  • Thread starter nonequilibrium
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation is discussing the equation \prod_{0 \leq i \leq n} (X - \omega_n^i) = \left( \prod_{1 \leq d \leq n \quad d | n} \right) \left( \prod_{0 \leq i \leq d-1 \quad \textrm{gcd}(d,i)=1} \right) (X - \omega_d^i) and whether it is true or not. The speaker initially believes it is true, but later realizes their mistake. They continue to discuss how to prove the equation.
  • #1
nonequilibrium
1,439
2
How do I see that for any natural non-zero n:

[itex]\left( \prod_{1 \leq d \leq n \quad d | n} \right) \left( \prod_{0 \leq i \leq d-1 \quad \textrm{gcd}(d,i)=1} \right) a_i = \prod_{0 \leq i \leq n-1} a_i[/itex]?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I would say this is going to be hard to prove. EXCEEDINGLY hard to prove. Because... it's not true. For instance, letting n = 6, the LHS is

[tex]
a_0 a_1^3 a_2 a_5
[/tex]

The RHS, of course, is

[tex]
a_0 a_1 a_2 a_3 a_4 a_5
[/tex]

Or maybe I don't understand your notation?
 
  • #3
Well that explains why I couldn't prove it :p

I was (am) trying to prove that [itex]X^n - 1 = \left( \prod_{1 \leq d \leq n \quad d | n} \right) \Phi_d[/itex] where [itex]\Phi_d = \left( \prod_{0 \leq i \leq d-1 \quad \textrm{gcd}(d,i)=1} \right) (X - \omega_d^i)[/itex] where [itex]\omega_d = \exp{ (2 \pi i /d) }[/itex]

The RHS of my original equation can be understood by noting that [itex]X^n-1=\prod_{0 \leq i \leq n} (X-\omega_n^i)[/itex]

but I now see my error... My apologies

However, I'm still not sure how to prove the above equation, aka that

[itex]\prod_{0 \leq i \leq n} (X-\omega_n^i) = \left( \prod_{1 \leq d \leq n \quad d | n} \right) \left( \prod_{0 \leq i \leq d-1 \quad \textrm{gcd}(d,i)=1} \right) (X - \omega_d^i)[/itex]
 

FAQ: How do I see this? Simplification

How does simplification help in understanding complex data?

Simplification involves breaking down complex data into smaller and more manageable chunks. This helps in organizing and clarifying the data, making it easier to identify patterns and relationships. It also helps in reducing cognitive load and improving overall understanding.

What are some techniques for simplifying data visualization?

Some common techniques for simplifying data visualization include using clear and concise labels, limiting the number of data points or variables displayed, and using visual aids such as charts and graphs to represent complex data.

How do I determine what information to include and what to leave out?

The key is to identify the main message or story you want to convey with your data visualization. This will help you decide what information is essential and what can be left out. It's important to strike a balance between providing enough information to support your message and avoiding overwhelming the viewer with too much data.

Can simplification lead to oversimplification of data?

Simplification should be done carefully to avoid oversimplification of data. It's important to maintain the integrity and accuracy of the data while simplifying it. This can be achieved by using appropriate visual aids and providing context and explanations for the data.

How can I ensure that my simplified data visualization is effective?

To ensure that your simplified data visualization is effective, it's important to consider the audience and their level of understanding. Use appropriate visual aids and design elements to make the data easy to interpret. It's also helpful to get feedback from others and make revisions if necessary.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
599
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top