How do we conclude to the last relation?

  • MHB
  • Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Relation
In summary, the example has two equations, one of which is in the form $v=u_1+\sqrt{\frac{a}{b}}u_2$, where $u_1$ and $u_2$ are constants. When these two equations are substituted together, it yields the equation $v_t+\sqrt{ab}v_x=0$. This equation is constant when $x-\sqrt{ab}t$ is constant, which means that $u_1+\sqrt{\frac{a}{b}}u_2=\frac{f(x-\sqrt{ab}t)}{2}$.
  • #1
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
5,049
7
Hey! :eek:

I am looking at an example of the characteristic system of hyperbolic equations.

One part of the example is the following:

$\displaystyle{v=\text{ constant }, v=u_1+\sqrt{\frac{a}{b}}u_2}$, when $\displaystyle{\frac{dx}{dt}=\sqrt{ab}}$

$\displaystyle{x=\sqrt{ab}t+c \Rightarrow c=x- \sqrt{ab}t}$

$\displaystyle{v}$ is constant when $\displaystyle{x-\sqrt{ab}t}$ is constant.

That means that $$u_1+\sqrt{\frac{a}{b}}u_2=\frac{f(x-\sqrt{ab}t)}{2}$$Could you explain me how we conclude to the last relation?? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
mathmari said:
One part of the example is the following:

$\displaystyle{v=\text{ constant }, v=u_1+\sqrt{\frac{a}{b}}u_2}$, when $\displaystyle{\frac{dx}{dt}=\sqrt{ab}}$

$\displaystyle{x=\sqrt{ab}t+c \Rightarrow c=x- \sqrt{ab}t}$

$\displaystyle{v}$ is constant when $\displaystyle{x-\sqrt{ab}t}$ is constant.

That means that $$u_1+\sqrt{\frac{a}{b}}u_2=\frac{f(x-\sqrt{ab}t)}{2}$$

At the beginning we had set $\displaystyle{v=u_1+\sqrt{\frac{a}{b}}u_2}$ , then we got (by replacing in an other equation):
$$v_t +\sqrt{ab}v_x =0$$

Then we know that $v$ is constant when $\displaystyle{\frac{dx}{dt} =\sqrt{ab}}$ , that means when $\displaystyle{c=x−\sqrt{ab} t }$, so when $\displaystyle{x-\sqrt{ab}t}$ is constant.

$$v: \text{ constant } \Rightarrow v=C ′ \Rightarrow u_1+\sqrt{\frac{a}{b}}u_2=C ′$$

So do we consider that this $C ′$ is equal to $\displaystyle{\frac{f(x-\sqrt{ab}t)}{2}}$ ??

Do we suppose that there is a function $f$ such that at the point $(x-\sqrt{ab}t)$ it's equal to $2C ′ $ ??

Or is there an other way how we conclude that $\displaystyle{u_1+\sqrt{\frac{a}{b}}u_2=\frac{f(x-\sqrt{ab}t)}{2}}$?? (Wondering)
 
  • #3
Since no one has answered yet... can I ask for clarification? (Blush)

What is the actual problem statement?

And how are all these symbols defined? (Wasntme)
 
  • #4
I like Serena said:
Since no one has answered yet... can I ask for clarification? (Blush)

What is the actual problem statement?

And how are all these symbols defined? (Wasntme)

I have posted the whole example at the thread http://mathhelpboards.com/differential-equations-17/need-explanation-hyperbolic-system-equations-10732.html

(post #5)

(Cool)
 
  • #5


To conclude to the last relation, we can follow the steps given in the example. First, we have the equation $\displaystyle{v=u_1+\sqrt{\frac{a}{b}}u_2}$ and the condition $\displaystyle{\frac{dx}{dt}=\sqrt{ab}}$. This means that $\displaystyle{v}$ must be constant when $\displaystyle{x-\sqrt{ab}t}$ is constant.

Next, we can solve for $\displaystyle{x}$ in terms of $\displaystyle{t}$ by taking the integral of $\displaystyle{\frac{dx}{dt}=\sqrt{ab}}$ with respect to $\displaystyle{t}$. This gives us the equation $\displaystyle{x=\sqrt{ab}t+c}$, where $\displaystyle{c}$ is a constant of integration.

Substituting this expression for $\displaystyle{x}$ into the original equation for $\displaystyle{v}$, we get $\displaystyle{v=u_1+\sqrt{\frac{a}{b}}u_2=\frac{f(x-\sqrt{ab}t)}{2}}$, where $\displaystyle{f}$ is a function of $\displaystyle{x-\sqrt{ab}t}$.

Finally, we can rearrange this equation to get the last relation, $\displaystyle{u_1+\sqrt{\frac{a}{b}}u_2=\frac{f(x-\sqrt{ab}t)}{2}}$, which shows the relationship between $\displaystyle{u_1}$ and $\displaystyle{u_2}$ when $\displaystyle{x-\sqrt{ab}t}$ is constant. This conclusion is based on the given conditions and the mathematical operations used to solve for $\displaystyle{x}$ and substitute it into the original equation.
 

FAQ: How do we conclude to the last relation?

How do we determine causation when analyzing relationships between variables?

Establishing causation between variables requires careful analysis and consideration of several factors. One commonly used method is through controlled experiments, where one variable is manipulated and the effect on another variable is measured. Other methods include statistical analysis and correlation studies.

What is the importance of considering confounding variables when concluding to a relationship?

Confounding variables are factors that can impact the relationship between two variables, making it difficult to establish a clear conclusion. It is important to identify and control for these variables in order to accurately determine a relationship between two variables.

Is correlation the same as causation?

No, correlation does not necessarily imply causation. Just because two variables are correlated, it does not mean that one causes the other. It is important to consider other factors and conduct further analysis to determine causation.

How do we ensure that our conclusion is valid and reliable?

In order to ensure the validity and reliability of a conclusion, it is important to use proper research methods and techniques, carefully consider all variables and potential biases, and replicate the study to ensure consistent results. Peer review and replication by other researchers can also help to validate conclusions.

Can a relationship between two variables change over time?

Yes, relationships between variables can change over time. It is important to constantly re-evaluate and update conclusions based on new data and evidence. Longitudinal studies, which track changes over time, can help to determine the stability of a relationship between variables.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
631
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
4K
Back
Top