How do we interpret the steps in the algorithm to balance a redox equation?

  • #1
zenterix
758
84
Homework Statement
The book I am reading first quickly introduces the concept of a half-reaction.

Consider the reaction of zinc with silver ions

$$\mathrm{Zn(s)+2Ag^+(aq)\rightarrow Zn^{2+}(aq)+2Ag(s)}$$
Relevant Equations
Zinc is oxidized and silver is reduced.

The conceptual oxidation half-reaction that occurs with the zinc is

$$\mathrm{Zn(s)\rightarrow Zn^{2+}(s)+2e^-}$$
The conceptual reduction half-reaction that occurs with silver is

$$\mathrm{Ag^+(aq)+e^-\rightarrow Ag(s)}$$

The book then immediately starts talking about balancing the chemical equation for a redox equation.
Balancing the chemical equation for a redox reaction by inspection can be a real challenge in some instances, especially for one taking place in aqueous solution, when water may participate and ##\mathrm{H_2O}## and either ##\mathrm{H^+}## (in acidic solutions) or ##\mathrm{OH^-}## (in basic solutions) must be included.
They then jump right in with an algorithm for balancing complicated redox equations.

I don't really understand what is going on even though I can perform the steps in the algorithm.

I will write out an example here to show exactly what I don't understand.

Suppose we have a solution of permanganate ions, ##\mathrm{MnO_4^-}##, which are powerful oxidizing agents.

We titrate with a solution of oxalic acid, ##\mathrm{H_2C_2O_4}## to determine the concentration of the permanganate solution.

From what I understood, to perform the calculations in that titration we need to know the balanced net ionic equation.

We only have, however, the skeletal equation

$$\mathrm{MnO_4^-(aq)+H_2C_2O_4(aq)\rightarrow Mn^{2+}(aq)+CO_2(g)}\tag{1}$$

which shows us that Mn in permanganate is reduced and the C in oxalic acid is oxidized.

The skeletal equations for the reduction and oxidation are

$$\mathrm{MnO_4^-\rightarrow Mn^{2+}}\tag{2}$$

$$\mathrm{H_2C_2O_4\rightarrow CO_2}\tag{3}$$

These are just pieces of the whole skeletal equation in (1).

The plan is to balance each of (2) and (3) independently, then sum them in a way that we don't have any free electrons in the final equation.

Let's see how we balance the reduction skeletal equation.

We add water to the rhs to balance the O on the lhs

$$\mathrm{MnO_4^-\rightarrow Mn^{2+}+4H_2O}$$

Then we add ##\mathrm{H^+}## on the lhs to balance the H on the rhs

$$\mathrm{MnO_4^-+8H^+\rightarrow Mn^{2+}+4H_2O}$$

I have no idea why we can do this.

Finally, we add electrons to balance the charges on each side

$$\mathrm{MnO_4^-+8H^++5e^-\rightarrow Mn^{2+}+4H_2O}$$

The five electrons have the same charge as the change in charge of ##\mathrm{Mn}## when it is reduced.

But what does this equation actually represent?

I mean, at this point I am lost regarding what the heck ##\mathrm{H^+}## means since they apparently don't actually exist in that form.

The five electrons I am assuming come from the other half-reaction, the oxidation.

I'll write that out here without going through the steps used to obtain it

$$\mathrm{H_2C_2O_4\rightarrow 2CO_2+2H^++2e^-}$$

Finally, we bring the two half-reactions together but first we multiply each one so that when we sum the electrons cancel out.

We add

$$\mathrm{2MNO_4^-+16H^++10e^-\rightarrow 2Mn^{2+}+8H_2O}$$

$$\mathrm{5H_2C_2O_4\rightarrow 10CO_2+10H^++10e^-}$$

to get

$$\mathrm{2MnO_4^-+5H_2C_2O_4+16H^+\rightarrow 2Mn^++8H_2O+10CO_2+10H^+}$$

and we simplify a bit more

$$\mathrm{2MnO_4^-(aq)+5H_2C_2O_4(aq)+6H^+(aq)\rightarrow 2Mn^+(aq)+8H_2O(l)+10CO_2(g)}$$

As I said, I can carry out the steps to obtain this equation but I have no idea what it means really because I don't know what the roles of the ##\mathrm{H^+}## and the ##\mathrm{H_2O}##'s are.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The H+ is there to mop up the O to give H2O.
It results in balancing the equation overall.
It accounts for the O in the permanganate ion, as they can't just disappear.
By following the steps as written you are able to balance an equation that is trickier to balance by other methods, especially as you are not told all the reactants at the start of the question.
 
  • #3
I am struggling to see the relationship between the skeletal equation (1) and the final balanced form.

They seem to denote the same thing, except one is kind of just conceptual and the other is actually numerically correct.

But from the point of view of the individual atoms and electrons, for example, it seems the 2 Mn loses a total of 10 electrons and the 10 C gain a total of 10 electrons.

The hydrogen remains with the same oxidation number. It is initially in hydronium and then is in water, but it seems to definitely interact with the permanganate and the oxalic acid.

Just not clear how, or if it is important. But not being important for the reaction isn't the same as not being important to really understand the concepts here.
 
  • #4
  • #5
As I said, and as the intro text you quote says, this type of equation is tricky to balance by inspection (looking at it and working through a different set of rules)

What purpose do the H+ ions serve? They mop up the O atoms to form water and lead to a balanced final equation! So they need to be there. Your final equation in your question shows the balanced equation. Remove all the H+ ions and you will see it is not balanced!

As balancing these redox reactions which take place in water solutions can be tricky, as has been said several times, the sequence of steps to get a balanced final equation matches the real result. We don't end up with spare O atoms or excess starting reagent. It's a sequence of steps that over time has been shown to work. That is what matters, it matches the real ratios observed. Stating H+ instead of H3O+ or the more complicated structures possible { eg (H20)6H3O+ for example} just makes live easier, as all the H2O molecules wrapped round the H+ don't actually get involved in a change and are superfluous and troublesome. Just like the K+ ions which undergo no changes and so are not mentioned anywhere but they are there in the potassium permanganate solution. The final equation contains only the ions and molecules that undergo any change in the reaction.

As an example, the Zn/Ag+ final equation ignores any other ions that the silver is combined with or present in solution as they stay there unchanged. So no H2O, no H+, no Cl-, no NO3-, etc.

You say "I am struggling to see the relationship between the skeletal equation (1) and the final balanced form."
Answer - The skeletal equation shows the main reactants and is not balanced. The final is the balanced equation showing all the bits that actually react and change into something else. The final version shows that the water and H+ ions in it are involved, which is not obvious until you work through the steps and finally balance the equation.
 
  • #6
You could also set up conservation equations for all elements + charge and use default linear algebra to find the coefficients.
 
  • #7
We can do this because it's how it works. For example, KMnO4 for TLC staining is developed in 2 M H2SO4. Rewrite your work with a strong acid and that's where you get your protons.


(On phone, cant format right now)
 
  • #8
You may also consider it like this:
$$[\mathrm{Mn(H_2O)_4]^{2+}} \rightarrow \mathrm{[Mn(H_2O)_4]^{7+}}+5\mathrm{e}^-\rightarrow\mathrm{MnO_4^-}+5\mathrm{e}^-+8\mathrm{H}^+$$,
i.e. increasing the oxidation state of the central ion increases the acidity of the complex. This is also why we usually do not consider methane to be a strong acid, while formic acid certainly is one.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top