How Do You Calculate Surface Integrals for Vector Fields?

In summary, we have two problems on surface integrals. The first problem involves evaluating the flux of a constant vector field through a curved hemispherical surface using Stoke's theorem. However, since the curl of the vector is zero, the surface integral evaluates to 0 as well. The second problem involves finding the value of a surface integral over a paraboloid using the gradient of the surface as the integrand. The region of integration is over z>0, and the projected region onto the xy-plane is a circle. Evaluating the integral gives a final result of -3/2.
  • #1
Reshma
749
6
I have two problems on surface integrals.

1] I have a constant vector [itex]\vec v = v_0\hat k[/itex]. I have to evaluate the flux of this vector field through a curved hemispherical surface defined by [itex]x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2[/itex], for z>0. The question says use Stoke's theorem.

Stoke's theorem suggests:
[tex]\int_s \left(\vec \nabla \times \vec v\right) \cdot d\vec a = \int_p \vec v \cdot d\vec l[/tex]

But the curl of this vector comes out to be zero . Am I going right? How is the surface integral evaluated?

2] I have a vector field [itex]\vec A = y\hat i + z\hat j + x\hat k[/itex]. I have to find the value of the surface integral:
[tex]\int_s \left(\vec \nabla \times \vec A\right) \cdot d\vec a[/tex]

The surface S here is a paraboloid defined by:
[tex]z = 1 - x^2 - y^2[/tex]

I evaluated the curl and it comes out to be:
[tex]\vec \nabla \times \vec A = -1\left(\hat i + \hat j + \hat k\right)[/tex]

I need help here on the procedure to evaluate the surface integral.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Reshma said:
I have two problems on surface integrals.

1] I have a constant vector [itex]\vec v = v_0\hat k[/itex]. I have to evaluate the flux of this vector field through a curved hemispherical surface defined by [itex]x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2[/itex], for z>0. The question says use Stoke's theorem.

Stoke's theorem suggests:
[tex]\int_s \left(\vec \nabla \times \vec v\right) \cdot d\vec a = \int_p \vec v \cdot d\vec l[/tex]

But the curl of this vector comes out to be zero . Am I going right? How is the surface integral evaluated?
Not , :biggrin: ! The integral of 0 over any volume is 0 so you have the answer right in front of you! Since you are using Stoke's theorem, you don't need to evaluate the surface integral.

2] I have a vector field [itex]\vec A = y\hat i + z\hat j + x\hat k[/itex]. I have to find the value of the surface integral:
[tex]\int_s \left(\vec \nabla \times \vec A\right) \cdot d\vec a[/tex]

The surface S here is a paraboloid defined by:
[tex]z = 1 - x^2 - y^2[/tex]

I evaluated the curl and it comes out to be:
[tex]\vec \nabla \times \vec A = -1\left(\hat i + \hat j + \hat k\right)[/tex]

I need help here on the procedure to evaluate the surface integral.
You probably have a formula for [itex]d\vec a[/itex] but here is how I like to think about it: The surface is given by z= 1- x2- y2 which is the same as x2+ y2+ z= 1. We can think of that as a "level surface" of the function f(x,y,z)= x2+y2+ z. The gradient of that: 2xi+ 2yj+ k is normal to the surface and, since it is "normalized" to the xy-plane in the sense that the k component is 1, [itex]d\vec a= (2xi+ 2yj+ k)dxdy[/itex].
Take the dot product of that with -(i+ j+ k) to get the integrand. You don't say over what region of the paraboloid that is to be integrated. If it is over the region above z= 0, then projected into the xy-plane, you have the circle x2+ y2= 1. Integrate over that circle. It will probably be simplest to do it in polar coordinates.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
Thank you very, very much! o:)

[tex]\left(\vec \nabla \times \vec A\right) \cdot d\vec a = -\left(2x + 2y + 1\right)dxdy[/tex]

The region of integration is over z>0. Just a little doubt...will the projected region on the xy-plane be a circle even if z>0?

[tex]\int_s \left(\vec \nabla \times \vec A\right) \cdot d\vec a = -\int_0^1 \int_0^1 \left(2x + 2y + 1\right)dxdy[/tex]

[tex]\int_s \left(\vec \nabla \times \vec A\right) \cdot d\vec a = -\int_0^1 \int_0^1 \left(2xdx + 2ydx + 1dx\right)dy[/tex]

[tex]\int_s \left(\vec \nabla \times \vec A\right) \cdot d\vec a = -2\int_0^1 (1+y)dy[/tex]

Evaluation of this gives me: -3
 
Last edited:

FAQ: How Do You Calculate Surface Integrals for Vector Fields?

What is a surface integral problem?

A surface integral problem is a type of mathematical problem that involves calculating the integral of a function over a specified surface. The surface can be a two-dimensional plane, a curved surface, or a three-dimensional object. Surface integrals are often used in physics and engineering to calculate quantities such as flux or work on a surface.

How is a surface integral different from a regular integral?

A regular integral involves calculating the area under a curve in a two-dimensional plane. In contrast, a surface integral involves calculating the integral over a three-dimensional surface. This means that in addition to integrating over the x and y coordinates, a surface integral also involves integrating over the z coordinate.

What are some real-life applications of surface integrals?

Surface integrals have many real-life applications, particularly in physics and engineering. They are used to calculate the flux of a vector field through a surface, the work done by a force on a surface, and the mass of a three-dimensional object. They are also used in fluid dynamics to calculate the flow of fluids through a surface.

What are the different types of surface integrals?

There are two types of surface integrals: single integrals and double integrals. Single integrals are used to calculate the surface area of a curved surface, while double integrals are used to calculate quantities such as flux or work on a surface. Double integrals can also be further classified as either surface integrals of the first kind, which are used for scalar fields, or surface integrals of the second kind, which are used for vector fields.

What are some techniques for solving surface integral problems?

There are several techniques that can be used to solve surface integral problems, including parametrization, the divergence theorem, and Stokes' theorem. Parametrization involves representing the surface as a function of two variables and then integrating over those variables. The divergence theorem relates a surface integral to a volume integral, making it easier to solve. Stokes' theorem relates a surface integral to a line integral, which can be more manageable to calculate in some cases.

Back
Top