How Do You Derive and Analyze the Matrix for 3 Coupled Oscillators?

In summary: No. If \lambda < 0 then \mathbf{x} = \mathbf{v}e^{\pm \omega_0\sqrt{|\lambda|}t} and we have exponential growth or decay. Thus we must have \lambda \geq 0.
  • #1
Lambda96
223
75
Homework Statement
See Screenshot
Relevant Equations
none
Hi,

I am not sure if I have derived the matrix correctly, because of my results in task b

Bildschirmfoto 2023-02-12 um 21.16.09.png


I solved task 1 as follows, I assumed that all three particles move to the right

$$m \dot{x_1}=-k(x_1 - x_2)$$
$$2m \dot{x_2}=-k(x_2-x_2)-3k(x_2-x_3)$$
$$3m \dot{x_3}=-3k(x_3-x_2)$$

Then I simply divided all three equations by the masses and got the following form

$$ \dot{x_1}=-\frac{k}{m}(x_1 - x_2)$$
$$ \dot{x_2}=-\frac{k}{2m}(x_2-x_2)-\frac{3k}{2m}(x_2-x_3)$$
$$ \dot{x_3}=-\frac{k}{m}(x_3-x_2)$$

Then I set up the 3 equations in the required matrix form:$$\frac{d}{dt^2} \vec{x}=\left( \begin{array}{rrr}
-\frac{k}{m} & \frac{k}{m} & 0 \\
\frac{k}{2m} & -(\frac{k}{2m}+\frac{3k}{2m}) & \frac{3k}{2m} \\
0 & \frac{k}{m} & -\frac{k}{m} \\
\end{array}\right) \left( \begin{array}{rrr}
x_1 \\
x_2 \\
x_3 \\
\end{array}\right)$$

For task part b, I simply put ##\vec{x}(t)=e^{i \omega t} \vec{v}## into the matrix above and then divided out the exponential term on both sides.$$ -\omega^2 \vec{v}= \left( \begin{array}{rrr}
-\frac{k}{m} & \frac{k}{m} & 0 \\
\frac{k}{2m} & -(\frac{k}{2m}+\frac{3k}{2m}) & \frac{3k}{2m} \\
0 & \frac{k}{m} & -\frac{k}{m} \\
\end{array}\right) \vec{v}$$

After that I just got everything on one site and used that ##\frac{k}{m}=\omega_0## is

$$ \left( \begin{array}{rrr}
0 \\
0 \\
0 \\
\end{array}\right)= \left( \begin{array}{rrr}
-\frac{k}{m}+\omega^2 & \frac{k}{m} & 0 \\
\frac{k}{2m} & -(\frac{k}{2m}+\frac{3k}{2m})+\omega^2 & \frac{3k}{2m} \\
0 & \frac{k}{m} & -\frac{k}{m}+\omega^2 \\
\end{array}\right) \vec{v}$$

Now, to determine ##\omega##, I simply formed the determinant of the matrix and got the following:

$$\frac{3 \omega_0^6}{2}+\frac{3 \omega_0^4 \omega^2}{2}-2 \omega_0^2 \omega^4- \omega^6=0$$

If I now solve the equation for ##\omega##, I get the following values

$$\omega_1=\pm \omega_0$$
$$\omega_2=\pm \sqrt{\frac{1}{2}(3+ \sqrt{3})}\sqrt{-\omega_0^2}$$
$$\omega_3=\pm \frac{\sqrt{(\sqrt{3}-3) \omega_0^2}}{\sqrt{2}}$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You can simplify your calculations by writing the system as [tex]
\ddot{\mathbf{x}} + \omega_0^2 \begin{pmatrix}
1 & -1 & 0 \\ -\tfrac12 & 2 & -\tfrac32 \\ 0 & -1 & 1
\end{pmatrix}\mathbf{x} = 0[/tex] where [itex]\omega_0^2 = k/m[/itex]. Then after substituting [itex]\mathbf{x} = \mathbf{v}e^{i\omega t}[/itex] you can set [itex]\omega^2 = \lambda \omega_0^2[/itex] to obtain [tex]
\omega_0^2\begin{pmatrix}
1 - \lambda & -1 & 0 \\ -\tfrac12 & 2 - \lambda & -\tfrac 32 \\ 0 & -1 & 1 - \lambda
\end{pmatrix}\mathbf{v} = 0.[/tex] The determinant is then (EDIT: This is incorrect; please see below) [tex]
(1 - \lambda)((2 - \lambda)(1 - \lambda) + \tfrac32) - \tfrac12 (1 - \lambda) = (1- \lambda)(\lambda^2 - 3\lambda + 3).[/tex] Thus we have [itex]\lambda = 1, \sqrt{3}e^{\pm i\pi/6}[/itex]. Therefore [tex]
\frac{\omega}{\omega_0} = \pm 1, 3^{1/4}e^{\pm i\pi/12}, 3^{1/4}e^{\pm i 5 \pi /12}.[/tex] We can immediately see that the roots occur in complex conjugate pairs, as expected.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Lambda96 and PhDeezNutz
  • #3
I've not explicitly checked the calculation, but how can you get complex eigenvalues for a non-dissipative system of harmonic oscillators?
 
  • Like
Likes Lambda96 and pasmith
  • #4
vanhees71 said:
I've not explicitly checked the calculation, but how can you get complex eigenvalues for a non-dissipative system of harmonic oscillators?

Yes, I see I have made a sign error; the determinant should be [tex]
(1 - \lambda)((2-\lambda)(1 - \lambda) - \tfrac32 ) - \tfrac12(1 - \lambda) = (1 - \lambda)(\lambda^2 - 3\lambda).[/tex]
 
  • Like
Likes Lambda96 and vanhees71
  • #5
That looks good!
 
  • Like
Likes Lambda96
  • #6
I should also note that we expect a zero eigenvalue: The centre of mass does not accelerate, so [tex]m_i \ddot x_i = m_i M_{ij} x_j = 0[/tex] for every [itex]x_j[/itex]. But this requires that [tex]m_i M_{ij} = 0[/tex] so [itex]m_i \neq 0[/itex] is a left eigenvector with eigenvalue zero.
 
  • Like
Likes Lambda96 and vanhees71
  • #7
Thank you pasmith and vanhees71 for your help 👍👍, sorry I'm only getting back to you now, the last few weeks have been a bit stressful 🙃

Now I have understood how I can solve the task much easier, thank you very much 👍

One quick question, does the sign of the eigenvalues actually tell me in which direction the masses are moving?
 
  • #8
Lambda96 said:
One quick question, does the sign of the eigenvalues actually tell me in which direction the masses are moving?

No. If [itex]\lambda < 0[/itex] then [itex]\mathbf{x} = \mathbf{v}e^{\pm \omega_0\sqrt{|\lambda|}t}[/itex] and we have exponential growth or decay. Thus we must have [itex]\lambda \geq 0[/itex]. The zero eigenvalue corresponds to a constant drift of the centre of mass; the other eigenvalues give the frequencies of oscillation about the centre of mass. The corresponding eigenvectors will show you the relative motion of the masses.
 

FAQ: How Do You Derive and Analyze the Matrix for 3 Coupled Oscillators?

What is the basic setup for a system of 3 coupled oscillators?

A system of 3 coupled oscillators typically consists of three masses connected by springs in a linear arrangement. Each mass can move in one dimension, and the springs provide the coupling between the masses. The setup can be represented by three masses (m1, m2, m3) connected by springs with spring constants (k1, k2, k3) where the outer springs connect the masses to fixed points and the inner springs connect adjacent masses.

How do you write the equations of motion for 3 coupled oscillators?

The equations of motion for 3 coupled oscillators are derived from Newton's second law, F = ma. For each mass, the net force is the sum of the spring forces acting on it. This results in a set of second-order differential equations. For instance, for mass m1, the equation is m1 * d²x1/dt² = -k1 * x1 + k2 * (x2 - x1). Similar equations can be written for m2 and m3, resulting in a system of three coupled differential equations.

How do you represent the system of equations in matrix form?

The system of differential equations can be written in matrix form as M * d²X/dt² = -K * X, where M is the mass matrix, K is the stiffness matrix, and X is the displacement vector. For the 3 coupled oscillators, M is a diagonal matrix with the masses on the diagonal, and K is a symmetric matrix representing the spring constants and their connections. The displacement vector X contains the displacements of the three masses.

How do you solve the matrix equation for the normal modes and eigenfrequencies?

To find the normal modes and eigenfrequencies, we assume solutions of the form X = A * e^(iωt), where A is the amplitude vector and ω is the angular frequency. Substituting this into the matrix equation and simplifying, we get the eigenvalue problem (K - ω²M) * A = 0. Solving this equation involves finding the eigenvalues (ω²) and eigenvectors (A) of the matrix M^(-1)K. The eigenvalues give the squared eigenfrequencies, and the eigenvectors give the normal modes.

How do you analyze the normal modes of the system?

The normal modes are the characteristic patterns of motion where all parts of the system oscillate at the same frequency. By examining the eigenvectors obtained from the eigenvalue problem, we can determine how each mass moves relative to the others in each normal mode. Each eigenvector corresponds to a specific normal mode, and

Back
Top