- #1
mateomy
- 307
- 0
Here's the problem: I've solved it (sorta), but I still have a question...
If f is continuous and g and h are differentiable functions, find a formula for
[tex]
\frac{d}{dx}\,\int_{g(x)}^{h(x)} f(t)\,dt
[/tex]
Breaking it apart further...
[tex]
\frac{d}{dx}\, \bigg(\int_0^{h(x)} f(t)dt ,\ - \int_0^{g(x)} f(t)dt \, \bigg)
[/tex]
Now working with the individual pieces...
setting h(x) to s and h'(x) to ds\dx
[tex]
\frac{d}{ds} \, \int_0^s f(t)\,dt \, \frac{ds}{dx} \, --> \, f(s)\frac{ds}{dx} \, --> \, f(h(x))h'(x)
[/tex]
I do the same operation with g(x) but I have to reverse the limits of integration so the integral is a negative one at the end of all the work, looking ultimately like so...
[tex]
-f(g(x))g'(x)
[/tex]
Then showing the end result...
[tex]
\frac{d}{dx}\,\int_{g(x)}^{h(x)} f(t)\,dt \, = f(h(x))h'(x)-f(g(x))g'(x)
[/tex]
Thats how it is in the answer column anyway, I got the same result but rather than subtracting the g(x) portion FROM the h(x) portion I came up with an addition because of the f(g(x))g'(x) being a negative, so the (b-a) of the integration would turn into h(x)-(-g(x)) which would turn the subtraction to an addition. I can't figure out why it isnt. Can somebody please explain this to me.
If f is continuous and g and h are differentiable functions, find a formula for
[tex]
\frac{d}{dx}\,\int_{g(x)}^{h(x)} f(t)\,dt
[/tex]
Breaking it apart further...
[tex]
\frac{d}{dx}\, \bigg(\int_0^{h(x)} f(t)dt ,\ - \int_0^{g(x)} f(t)dt \, \bigg)
[/tex]
Now working with the individual pieces...
setting h(x) to s and h'(x) to ds\dx
[tex]
\frac{d}{ds} \, \int_0^s f(t)\,dt \, \frac{ds}{dx} \, --> \, f(s)\frac{ds}{dx} \, --> \, f(h(x))h'(x)
[/tex]
I do the same operation with g(x) but I have to reverse the limits of integration so the integral is a negative one at the end of all the work, looking ultimately like so...
[tex]
-f(g(x))g'(x)
[/tex]
Then showing the end result...
[tex]
\frac{d}{dx}\,\int_{g(x)}^{h(x)} f(t)\,dt \, = f(h(x))h'(x)-f(g(x))g'(x)
[/tex]
Thats how it is in the answer column anyway, I got the same result but rather than subtracting the g(x) portion FROM the h(x) portion I came up with an addition because of the f(g(x))g'(x) being a negative, so the (b-a) of the integration would turn into h(x)-(-g(x)) which would turn the subtraction to an addition. I can't figure out why it isnt. Can somebody please explain this to me.
Last edited: