How do you prove the relationship between electromagnetic and metric tensors?

  • Thread starter Emanuel84
  • Start date
In summary, the components of F are given by F_{ab}=\left(\begin{array}{cccc}0 & -E_{x} & -E_{y} & -E_{z}\\E_{x} & 0 & B_{z} & -B_{y}\\E_{y} & -B_{z} & 0 & B_{x}\\E_{z} & B_{y} & B_{x} & 0\end{array}\right) and G=dA.
  • #1
Emanuel84
14
0
Hi, I'm wondering how to prove the following...can you help me? :redface:
[itex]
F^{\mu \rho} G_{\rho \nu} = \eta^\mu_{\phantom{\mu}\nu} \mathbf{E} \cdot \mathbf{B}
[/itex][itex]
F^{\mu \nu} F_{\mu \nu} = -2\left(\mathbf{E}^2-\mathbf{B}^2\right)
[/itex][itex]
G^{\mu \nu} F_{\mu \nu} = -4\,\mathbf{E} \cdot \mathbf{B}
[/itex][itex]
G^{\mu \nu} G_{\mu \nu} = F^{\mu \nu} F_{\mu \nu}
[/itex]
[itex]F[/itex] is the electromagnetic tensor, [itex]G[/itex] is it's dual, [itex]\eta[/itex] is the metric tensor, [itex]\mathbf{E}[/itex] and [itex]\mathbf{B}[/itex] the electric and magnetic field respectively.Thank you for your patience! :wink:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You need to specify the definition of [tex]\vec E[/tex] and [tex]\vec B[/tex] in terms of your field tensors.

Up to sign, signature, and index-placement conventions, one can write
[tex]E_b=u^aF_{ab}[/tex] and [tex]B_b=u^aG_{ab}[/tex] for an observer with 4-velocity [tex]u^a[/tex]. By contracting with [tex]u^b[/tex], you can verify that these vectors are orthogonal to, i.e. "spatial according to" the observer with 4-velocity [tex]u^b[/tex]. You will probably need the spatial metric as well... up to conventions, write [tex]g_{ab}=u_au_b+h_{ab}[/tex] with the condition that [tex]u^a h_{ab}=0_b[/tex].
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Emanuel84 said:
Hi, I'm wondering how to prove the following...can you help me? :redface:
[itex]
F^{\mu \rho} G_{\rho \nu} = \eta^\mu_{\phantom{\mu}\nu} \mathbf{E} \cdot \mathbf{B}
[/itex][itex]
F^{\mu \nu} F_{\mu \nu} = -2\left(\mathbf{E}^2-\mathbf{B}^2\right)
[/itex][itex]
G^{\mu \nu} F_{\mu \nu} = -4\,\mathbf{E} \cdot \mathbf{B}
[/itex][itex]
G^{\mu \nu} G_{\mu \nu} = F^{\mu \nu} F_{\mu \nu}
[/itex]
[itex]F[/itex] is the electromagnetic tensor, [itex]G[/itex] is it's dual, [itex]\eta[/itex] is the metric tensor, [itex]\mathbf{E}[/itex] and [itex]\mathbf{B}[/itex] the electric and magnetic field respectively.Thank you for your patience! :wink:

It's quite straightforward. If we assume a Minkowski metric [tex]\eta_{ab}[/tex] of signature [tex](-+++)[/tex] then the components of [tex]F_{ab}[/tex] can be expressed simply as

[tex]
F_{ab}=\left(\begin{array}{cccc}
0 & -E_{x} & -E_{y} & -E_{z}\\
E_{x} & 0 & B_{z} & -B_{y}\\
E_{y} & -B_{z} & 0 & B_{x}\\
E_{z} & B_{y} & B_{x} & 0\end{array}\right)
[/tex]

with inverse

[tex]
F^{ab}=\left(\begin{array}{cccc}
0 & E_{x} & E_{y} & E_{z}\\
-E_{x} & 0 & B_{z} & -B_{y}\\
-E_{y} & -B_{z} & 0 & B_{x}\\
-E_{z} & B_{y} & -B_{x} & 0\end{array}\right)
[/tex]

The thing about the field tensor is that it is actually a closed exact 2-form field. If we define a one-form field [tex]A=(-\phi,\mathbf{A})=A_adx^a[/tex], then the electromagnetic two-form is defined as [tex]F=dA[/tex] (you can show that the components of [tex]F[/tex] are exactly those given above. Now define the Hodge dual through its action on basis forms as

[tex]\star\wedge_{i=1}^{p}\omega^{a_{i}}=\frac{\sqrt{|g|}}{(m-p)!}\epsilon_{\phantom{a_{1}\ldots a_{p}}b_{1}\ldots b_{m-p}}^{a_{1}\ldots a_{p}}\wedge_{i=1}^{m-p}\omega^{b_{i}}.[/tex]

This immediately gives you an expression for the components of [tex]\star F[/tex], or what you call [tex]G[/tex]. You can then find the required results simply by direct calculation.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Thank you everyone! :approve:
 

FAQ: How do you prove the relationship between electromagnetic and metric tensors?

How would you prove that your hypothesis is accurate?

The best way to prove that your hypothesis is accurate is by conducting experiments and collecting data that supports your hypothesis. This data should be analyzed and presented in a clear and organized manner to demonstrate the validity of your hypothesis.

What type of evidence do you need to provide to support your claim?

The type of evidence needed to support a claim varies depending on the nature of the claim and the scientific field. Generally, evidence can include experimental data, observations, statistical analysis, and expert opinions. It is important to use multiple forms of evidence to strengthen your argument.

How can you ensure that your experimental design is valid?

To ensure the validity of your experimental design, it is important to carefully plan and control all variables that may affect the outcome of your experiment. This includes using a control group, random assignment of subjects, and careful measurement and recording of data. Peer review and replication of the experiment can also help validate the design.

What role does statistical analysis play in proving your hypothesis?

Statistical analysis is crucial in proving a hypothesis as it allows for the interpretation of data and determination of the significance of results. By using statistical tests and calculations, scientists can determine if the results of their experiment support or reject their hypothesis.

How can you address potential biases in your research to ensure objectivity?

To address potential biases in research, scientists can use methods such as blind or double-blind experiments, where the subjects and/or researchers are unaware of which group is receiving the treatment. Additionally, peer review and replication of the experiment by other researchers can help identify any biases and ensure objectivity in the results.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
855
Replies
1
Views
653
Replies
5
Views
777
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top