- #1
Sparky_
- 227
- 5
Greetings,
I somewhat see the explanation but I need a conversation to clear the fog.
Part of a larger problem is this integral:
Find the volume of a cone [tex] r = 3sin(theta) [/tex] inside the sphere [tex] x^2 +y^2 + z^2 = 9 [/tex]
[tex]
\int \int \int r \,dz dr dtheta
[/tex]
My limits:
z goes from 0 to [tex] \sqrt{9-r^2}[/tex] with the integral multiplied by “2” to handle the +/- side of the square-root
r goes from 0 to 3 sin(theta)
and initially I had theta going from 0 to 2pi.
First integration:
[tex]
\int \int r\sqrt{9-r^2}\, dr dtheta
[/tex]
r from 0 to 3sin(theta)
theta from 0 to 2pi – again initially – I reasoned that this is not correct
Second integration:
[tex]
-\frac{2}{3} \int (9-r^2)^{2/3}\, dtheta
[/tex]
r from 0 to sin(theta)
[tex]
-\frac{2}{3} \int (9-9sin(theta)^2)^{2/3} - -9^{3/2}\, dtheta
[/tex]
With my limits from 0 to 2pi – wrong answer – I said “Ah the area under a sinusoidal – so 2 * the same integral from 0 to pi”
Wrong again
I then plot the polar plot of r = 3 sin(theta) and make a table and see that at pi/2 I get the first half of the “circle” polar plot.
So I said, “Ah 4* the integral from 0 to pi/2 to get all the way back to 2pi” – see I had 2pi on the brain.
Again – wrong answer, so I see that the plot completes the “circle” polar plot when the angle gets to pi.
So when I multiply the integral by 2 and go from 0 to pi/2 I get it.
Can you help clear the fog?
When I see an integral of a sinusoid, my first instinct was to multiply the integral by 2 and then integrate from 0 to pi.
I assume this is “Cartesian-thinking?”
Next, I want to say when working with polar coordinates, that the angle should “sweep” all the way around from 0 to 2pi.
I know the answer is associated with the plot of “r” – should one always generate a plot to see how “r” goes or is there a more straightforward way to set up the integral?
Thanks
Sparky
I somewhat see the explanation but I need a conversation to clear the fog.
Part of a larger problem is this integral:
Find the volume of a cone [tex] r = 3sin(theta) [/tex] inside the sphere [tex] x^2 +y^2 + z^2 = 9 [/tex]
[tex]
\int \int \int r \,dz dr dtheta
[/tex]
My limits:
z goes from 0 to [tex] \sqrt{9-r^2}[/tex] with the integral multiplied by “2” to handle the +/- side of the square-root
r goes from 0 to 3 sin(theta)
and initially I had theta going from 0 to 2pi.
First integration:
[tex]
\int \int r\sqrt{9-r^2}\, dr dtheta
[/tex]
r from 0 to 3sin(theta)
theta from 0 to 2pi – again initially – I reasoned that this is not correct
Second integration:
[tex]
-\frac{2}{3} \int (9-r^2)^{2/3}\, dtheta
[/tex]
r from 0 to sin(theta)
[tex]
-\frac{2}{3} \int (9-9sin(theta)^2)^{2/3} - -9^{3/2}\, dtheta
[/tex]
With my limits from 0 to 2pi – wrong answer – I said “Ah the area under a sinusoidal – so 2 * the same integral from 0 to pi”
Wrong again
I then plot the polar plot of r = 3 sin(theta) and make a table and see that at pi/2 I get the first half of the “circle” polar plot.
So I said, “Ah 4* the integral from 0 to pi/2 to get all the way back to 2pi” – see I had 2pi on the brain.
Again – wrong answer, so I see that the plot completes the “circle” polar plot when the angle gets to pi.
So when I multiply the integral by 2 and go from 0 to pi/2 I get it.
Can you help clear the fog?
When I see an integral of a sinusoid, my first instinct was to multiply the integral by 2 and then integrate from 0 to pi.
I assume this is “Cartesian-thinking?”
Next, I want to say when working with polar coordinates, that the angle should “sweep” all the way around from 0 to 2pi.
I know the answer is associated with the plot of “r” – should one always generate a plot to see how “r” goes or is there a more straightforward way to set up the integral?
Thanks
Sparky