How Do You Set Up Integrals in Polar Coordinates for Volume Calculation?

  • Thread starter Sparky_
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses finding the volume of a cone inside a sphere using polar coordinates. The speaker initially struggles with setting up the limits of the integral, but eventually realizes that the integral should be multiplied by 2 and the angle should only go from 0 to pi/2. The conversation also mentions the importance of drawing a clear picture and looking for symmetry planes to simplify the problem. The final solution involves an integral with limits of 0 to pi/2 for the angle, 0 to 3sin(theta) for the radius, and 0 to √(9-r^2) for the height.
  • #1
Sparky_
227
5
Greetings,

I somewhat see the explanation but I need a conversation to clear the fog.

Part of a larger problem is this integral:

Find the volume of a cone [tex] r = 3sin(theta) [/tex] inside the sphere [tex] x^2 +y^2 + z^2 = 9 [/tex]


[tex]
\int \int \int r \,dz dr dtheta
[/tex]

My limits:
z goes from 0 to [tex] \sqrt{9-r^2}[/tex] with the integral multiplied by “2” to handle the +/- side of the square-root

r goes from 0 to 3 sin(theta)

and initially I had theta going from 0 to 2pi.

First integration:

[tex]
\int \int r\sqrt{9-r^2}\, dr dtheta
[/tex]

r from 0 to 3sin(theta)
theta from 0 to 2pi – again initially – I reasoned that this is not correct

Second integration:

[tex]
-\frac{2}{3} \int (9-r^2)^{2/3}\, dtheta
[/tex]

r from 0 to sin(theta)

[tex]
-\frac{2}{3} \int (9-9sin(theta)^2)^{2/3} - -9^{3/2}\, dtheta
[/tex]

With my limits from 0 to 2pi – wrong answer – I said “Ah the area under a sinusoidal – so 2 * the same integral from 0 to pi”

Wrong again

I then plot the polar plot of r = 3 sin(theta) and make a table and see that at pi/2 I get the first half of the “circle” polar plot.

So I said, “Ah 4* the integral from 0 to pi/2 to get all the way back to 2pi” – see I had 2pi on the brain.

Again – wrong answer, so I see that the plot completes the “circle” polar plot when the angle gets to pi.

So when I multiply the integral by 2 and go from 0 to pi/2 I get it.

Can you help clear the fog?

When I see an integral of a sinusoid, my first instinct was to multiply the integral by 2 and then integrate from 0 to pi.

I assume this is “Cartesian-thinking?”

Next, I want to say when working with polar coordinates, that the angle should “sweep” all the way around from 0 to 2pi.

I know the answer is associated with the plot of “r” – should one always generate a plot to see how “r” goes or is there a more straightforward way to set up the integral?

Thanks
Sparky
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Cone? r=3sin\theta

Check that.
r^2=3rsin\theta
x^2+y^2=3y on x-y plane
Care to guess it is a cylinder? [Complete the square]

So where is my bonus? Even a raise? Forget tenure...
 
  • #3
yes I meant cylinder

the r = 3sin(theta) is correct.

More than anything I'm wanting clarification and further explanation on setting up the limits with polar coordinates.

Meaning - you see my first thought was to have theta go from 0 to 2pi.

Then when I proceeded I had an integral involving sinusoidal functions so I said "double" the integral from 0 to pi.

It wasn't until I plotted the graph and did a simple table (theta vs. r) that I saw that it's 2 times the integral from 0 to pi/2.

did I miss an easier way to "see" this problem.

What burned me was the integrating sin and it not being 2 times the integral from 0 to pi - like in Cartesian coordinates.

Help?
 
  • #4
Hello Sparky_,

The way to tackle these problems is first of all to draw a clear picture. In doing so you have to think allready what the behaviour is of the equations of the shapes you have and thus you would have avoided the [itex]2 \pi[/itex] issue. Then try to see if there are any symmetry planes and if so split the volume up into smaller pieces of equal size so you only need to determine one part and mostly a simpler integral is a consequence. In this case I would say there are 4 pieces, 1 above the XY plane and 1 below, each of these latter ones cutted up in two smaller ones by the YZ plane. In order to set up the limits of the integrals try to find out what comes last. In this case it would be the [itex] \theta[/itex] dependency and the limits are now [itex]0\leq \theta \leq \pi/2[/itex] which you can see from your picture. After that it would be the r dependency having limits [itex]0\leq r \leq 3sin(\theta )[/itex]. The first integral to solve would be the one for the height z and the limits can be obtained from the equation of the sphere. You need to transform it into polar coordinates. [itex]x^2+y^2=r^2[/itex], so these are [itex]0 \leq z \leq \sqrt{9-r^2}[/itex]. The integral looks now as:

[tex]V=4 \cdot \int_{0}^{\pi/2} \int_{0}^{3sin(\theta)} \int_{0}^{\sqrt{9-r^2}} dz \cdot r \cdot dr \cdot d\theta[/tex]

The evaluation is up to you, I'm going to bed it's very late over here :-)

Hope this helps,

coomast
 

FAQ: How Do You Set Up Integrals in Polar Coordinates for Volume Calculation?

What is a polar integral?

A polar integral is a type of integral that is used to calculate the area or volume of a region on a polar coordinate system. It involves integrating a function over a certain range of angles and radii.

Why is a polar integral useful?

A polar integral is useful because it allows us to calculate the area or volume of complex shapes that cannot be easily calculated using Cartesian coordinates. It is also helpful in physics and engineering, where many problems are naturally described using polar coordinates.

How do you set up a polar integral?

To set up a polar integral, you first need to determine the limits of integration for both the angle and radius. This can be done by graphing the region and identifying the curves that define the boundaries. Then, you need to express the function in terms of polar coordinates and set up the integral using the appropriate limits.

What are some common mistakes when setting up polar integrals?

Some common mistakes when setting up polar integrals include using the wrong limits of integration, failing to convert the function into polar coordinates, and not taking into account the symmetry of the region. It is important to carefully graph the region and double-check all calculations to avoid these mistakes.

What are some real-world applications of polar integrals?

Polar integrals have many real-world applications, such as calculating the volume of a cone or calculating the mass of a rotating object. They are also used in physics to calculate the moment of inertia for rotating bodies and in engineering to determine the force and torque on a rotating object.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top