MHB How Do You Solve and Graph This Quadratic Inequality?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quadratic
AI Thread Summary
To solve the quadratic inequality (x^2 - 1)/(x^2 + 8x + 15) ≥ 0, critical points are found by setting the numerator and denominator to zero, yielding x = -1, 1 for the numerator and x = -3, -5 for the denominator. The number line is divided into intervals based on these points, specifically (-∞, -5), (-5, -3), (-3, -1), (-1, 1), and (1, ∞). Testing these intervals shows that the solution includes (-∞, -5) and (1, ∞), while x = -3 and x = -5 are excluded due to being undefined. The final solution is confirmed as (-∞, -5) U (1, ∞).
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Section 2.6
Question 50Solve the quadratic inequality.

(x^2 - 1)/(x^2 + 8x + 15) ≥ 0

x^2 - 1 = (x - 1)(x + 1)

Question:

Do I solve the numerator or denominator to find the end points?

Setting each numerator factor to 0 we get x = 1, x = -1.

Factor denominator.

x^2 + 8x + 15 = (x + 3)(x + 5)

Set each denominator factor to 0.

x + 3 = 0

x = -3

x + 5 = 0

x = -5

Question:

Do I place x = -3 & x = -5 on the number line to test each interval?

Is the correct number line as follows?

<-----(-5)-----(-3)-----(-1)-----(1)----->

It looks like we must test 5 intervals, correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
Section 2.6
Question 50Solve the quadratic inequality.

(x^2 - 1)/(x^2 + 8x + 15) ≥ 0

x^2 - 1 = (x - 1)(x + 1)

Question:

Do I solve the numerator or denominator to find the end points?

You want to determine the roots of both the numerator and denominator as your critical numbers (i.e., values for which the expression can change sign).

RTCNTC said:
Setting each numerator factor to 0 we get x = 1, x = -1.

Factor denominator.

x^2 + 8x + 15 = (x + 3)(x + 5)

Set each denominator factor to 0.

x + 3 = 0

x = -3

x + 5 = 0

x = -5

Question:

Do I place x = -3 & x = -5 on the number line to test each interval?

Is the correct number line as follows?

<-----(-5)-----(-3)-----(-1)-----(1)----->

Yes, that's correct.

RTCNTC said:
It looks like we must test 5 intervals, correct?

You really only need to test 1 interval, since all roots are of multiplicity 1 (odd), the sign will alternate across all intervals. Because the inequality is weak, we include the end-points of the intervals that are part of the solution. :D
 
Is the correct number line as follows?

<-----(-5)-----(-3)-----(-1)-----(1)----->

I am going to test each interval for algebra practice.

(x - 1)(x + 1)/(x + 3)(x + 5) ≥ 0

When x = -3 & -5, we get undefined. This means we do include -3 and -5 as part of our solution. The same can be said for x = -1 & x = 1.

For (-infinity, -5), let x = -6. Here we get a true statement.

For (-5, -3), let x = -4. Here we get a false statement.

For (-3, -1), let x = -2. Here we get a false statement.

For (-1, 1), let x = 0. Here we get a false statement.

For (1, infinity), let x = 3. Here we get a true statement.

Solution: (-infinity, -5) U (1, infinity)

Correct?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top