How do you solve for multiple constants given the wave functions at the boundary?

Danielk010
Messages
35
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
In the region 0 ≤ x ≤ a, a particle is described by
the wave function ψ1(x) = ##−b(x^2 − a^2 )##. In the region
a ≤ x ≤ w, its wave function is ψ2(x) = ##(x − d)^2 − c##. For
x ≥ w, ψ3(x) = 0. (a) By applying the continuity conditions
at x = a, find c and d in terms of a and b. (b) Find w in terms of
a and b.
Relevant Equations
ψ1(x) = ##−b(x^2 − a^2 )##. 0 ≤ x ≤ a
ψ2(x) = ##(x − d)^2 − c##. a ≤ x ≤ w
ψ3(x) = 0 x ≥ w
From my understanding, you can equate ψ1(x) and ψ2(x) at the boundary of x = a, so I plugged in the values of a into x for both equations and I got ψ1(x) = 0 and ψ2(x) = ## (a-d)^2-c ##. I am a bit stuck on where to go from here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Danielk010 said:
and I got ψ1(x) = 0 and ψ2(x) = ## (a-d)^2-c ##. I am a bit stuck on where to go from here.
No. You got ψ1(a) = 0 and ψ2(a) = ## (a-d)^2-c ##. Equating ψ1 and ψ2 at x=a means you have ψ1(a) = ψ2(a)

Then: what about continuity of the first derivative ?

##\ ##
 
BvU said:
No. You got ψ1(a) = 0 and ψ2(a) = ## (a-d)^2-c ##. Equating ψ1 and ψ2 at x=a means you have ψ1(a) = ψ2(a)

Then: what about continuity of the first derivative ?

##\ ##
The continuity for the first derivative of which wave function?
 
BvU said:
No. You got ψ1(a) = 0 and ψ2(a) = ## (a-d)^2-c ##. Equating ψ1 and ψ2 at x=a means you have ψ1(a) = ψ2(a)

Then: what about continuity of the first derivative ?

##\ ##
I got it. Thank you so much for the help
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top