MHB How Do You Solve This Quadratic Inequality: x - [10/(x - 1)] ≥ 4?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quadratic
AI Thread Summary
To solve the quadratic inequality x - [10/(x - 1)] ≥ 4, start by rearranging the equation to isolate the terms, resulting in (x + 1)(x - 6)/(x - 1) ≥ 0. Exclude x = 1 due to division by zero and test intervals around the critical points -1, 1, and 6. The valid solutions are found to be in the intervals [-1, 1) and [6, ∞). The final solution confirms the inclusion of critical values where the inequality holds true.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Section 2.6
Question 68Solve the quadratic inequality.

x - [10/(x - 1)] ≥ 4

I begin by subtracting 4 from both sides and then simplify the left hand side, right?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
Section 2.6
Question 68Solve the quadratic inequality.

x - [10/(x - 1)] ≥ 4

I begin by subtracting 4 from both sides and then simplify the left hand side, right?

Yes, you should wind up with:

$$\frac{(x+1)(x-6)}{x-1}\ge0$$

And then observing we have a weak inequality, and that $x=1$ must be excluded (division by zero), testing 1 interval, and allowing the others to alternate signs, we wind up with:

$$[-1,1)\,\cup\,[6,\infty)$$
 
I will show my work tomorrow.
 
(x + 1)(x - 6)/(x - 1) ≥ 0

We exclude x = 1 because it creates (expression/0) but include it on the number line.

<-------(-1)----------(1)---------(6)--------->

If we let x = -1 and 6, the inequality becomes 0 ≥ 0, which is true. So, we include our critical values of x.

For (-infinity, -1), let x = -2. False statement.

For (-1, 1), let x = 0. True statement.

For (1, 6), let x = 2. False statement.

For (6, infinity), let x = 7. True statement.

Solution:

[-1, 1) U [6, infinity)
 
Last edited:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top