- #1
vicsmithvic
- 3
- 0
How do you learn how to use applied math not only as a modeling tool/statistics tool/numerical analysis tool, etc., but as a theoretical tool? How do you know when a proof holds true in applied math/physics/biology? For example:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v410/n6825/full/410268a0.html
From what I'm getting at, you basically have a really good mathematical model or law, and you are able to rephrase simple and inherently mathematical relationships in nature in terms of mathematical language. All I've seen from mathematical biology so far are differential equation models that were found long ago in physics, or geometry/topology being applied to molecules. I think I'm misunderstanding something about this topic.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v410/n6825/full/410268a0.html
This thread began with Peskin's model of the sinoatrial node, the heart's natural pacemaker, as a collection of N identical integrate-and-fire oscillators38. For the simple case where each oscillator is connected to all the others, Peskin conjectured that they would all end up firing in unison, no matter how they started. He gave a proof for N = 2 oscillators; it was later demonstrated39 that the conjecture holds for all N. Peskin also conjectured that synchronization would occur even if the oscillators were not quite identical, but that problem remains unproven.
From what I'm getting at, you basically have a really good mathematical model or law, and you are able to rephrase simple and inherently mathematical relationships in nature in terms of mathematical language. All I've seen from mathematical biology so far are differential equation models that were found long ago in physics, or geometry/topology being applied to molecules. I think I'm misunderstanding something about this topic.